In article ,
Eeyore wrote:
The earliest CD players were utter ****E. Esp the CDP-101. Truncated
reverb tails is what I remember especially.

You mean fading out the track early in the CD mastering to try and stop
you hearing the tape hiss?

--


Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
The earliest CD players were utter ****E. Esp the CDP-101. Truncated
reverb tails is what I remember especially.

You mean fading out the track early in the CD mastering to try and stop
you hearing the tape hiss?

NO.

I mean failure of signal resolution compared to CD (on a Sony CDP-101) with
vinyl on my Garrard 401 wirh Ortofon RMG309 arm and M75E II cartridge.

And (in my mind) you'd have to be DEAF not to notice it.

Graham

"Eeysore = total NUT CASE "

The earliest CD players were utter ****E. Esp the CDP-101. Truncated
reverb tails is what I remember especially.

You mean fading out the track early in the CD mastering to try and stop
you hearing the tape hiss?

NO.

I mean failure of signal resolution compared to CD (on a Sony CDP-101)
with
vinyl on my Garrard 401 wirh Ortofon RMG309 arm and M75E II cartridge.


** No turntable will play a CD and no CD player will play an LP.

Get the point - ****wit ?


And (in my mind) you'd have to be DEAF not to notice it.


** You have to be brain dead to wildly assume that CDs and LPs derived from
multi-generation tapes and "re-mastered " by god knows who on god know what
can be used to make such comparisons.

Totally invalid test method, used only by the worst sort of audiophool
cretins.




...... Phil

Phil Allison wrote:

"Eeysore = total NUT CASE "

The earliest CD players were utter ****E. Esp the CDP-101. Truncated
reverb tails is what I remember especially.

You mean fading out the track early in the CD mastering to try and stop
you hearing the tape hiss?

NO.

I mean failure of signal resolution compared to CD (on a Sony CDP-101)
with
vinyl on my Garrard 401 wirh Ortofon RMG309 arm and M75E II cartridge.

** No turntable will play a CD and no CD player will play an LP.

Get the point - ****wit ?

Go **** a pig you MORON.

"Eeysore = total NUT CASE "

The earliest CD players were utter ****E. Esp the CDP-101. Truncated
reverb tails is what I remember especially.

You mean fading out the track early in the CD mastering to try and stop
you hearing the tape hiss?

NO.

I mean failure of signal resolution compared to CD (on a Sony CDP-101)
with
vinyl on my Garrard 401 wirh Ortofon RMG309 arm and M75E II cartridge.


** No turntable will play a CD and no CD player will play an LP.

Get the point - ****wit ?


And (in my mind) you'd have to be DEAF not to notice it.


** You have to be brain dead to wildly assume that CDs and LPs derived from
multi-generation tapes and "re-mastered " by god knows who on god know what
can be used to make such comparisons.

Totally invalid test method, used only by the worst sort of audiophool
cretins.

" Go **** a pig you MORON."




...... Phil

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message

In article ,
Eeyore wrote:

The earliest CD players were utter ****E. Esp the
CDP-101. Truncated reverb tails is what I remember
especially.

You mean fading out the track early in the CD mastering
to try and stop you hearing the tape hiss?

I have two functional CDP101s at my disposal. If

http://www.pcavtech.com/play-rec/Sony_CDP-101/index.htm

doesn't convince, I might be convinced to do some fade-to-zero tests. The
CDP 101 is not at its best playing CD-Rs, but at least one of the two does
well enough if I do the burning at a low speed.