In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
My own editing experience goes back to splicing 2"
24-track analogue tape. It required a stout heart and a firm
hand to take a Chinagreaph pencil and a razor-blade to the
one and only tape, especially when ten pairs of beady eyes
were watching:-)

Really no different from editing *any* master tape.

--
*I took an IQ test and the results were negative.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
My own editing experience goes back to splicing 2"
24-track analogue tape. It required a stout heart and a firm
hand to take a Chinagreaph pencil and a razor-blade to the
one and only tape, especially when ten pairs of beady eyes
were watching:-)

Really no different from editing *any* master tape.

Except that there is no B master, as is usually the case
with 1/4.

In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:


"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
My own editing experience goes back to splicing 2"
24-track analogue tape. It required a stout heart and a firm
hand to take a Chinagreaph pencil and a razor-blade to the
one and only tape, especially when ten pairs of beady eyes
were watching:-)

Really no different from editing *any* master tape.

Except that there is no B master, as is usually the case
with 1/4.

Did you rely on getting a second shot?

--
*I'll try being nicer if you'll try being smarter

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article
, Iain
Churches wrote:
My own editing experience goes back to splicing 2"
24-track analogue tape. It required a stout heart and a
firm hand to take a Chinagreaph pencil and a razor-blade
to the one and only tape, especially when ten pairs of
beady eyes were watching:-)

Really no different from editing *any* master tape.

Been there, done that, and really appreciate modern DAW software for that
reason, if no other.