A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, will it work?



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old September 18th 08, 10:36 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
TT[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, will it work?

Hi

I'm building a 1x12" speaker cabinet to use with my guitar amp head. I have
all the thiele/small parameters for my speaker, and have used a program
called BandBox Pro to design the speaker cabinet. I have also used a program
called WinIsd to check and both programs give me similiar results.

I already have built a 150 litre cabinet to use with my speaker. I want to
tune my bassreflex box to 65Hz. The program says that with my rear baffle
thickness of 18mm, and 2 flush ends (I'm using a hole in the rear baffle for
port) I need to make a hole 300mm in diameter, to tune the box to 65Hz.

The port would be larger in diameter than my speaker, which is 279mm. Will
this kind of design work?
The program says that if I use 4 ports, 100mm each is sufficient, will this
work either? Is there any difference?

Thanks for answers!

TT


  #2 (permalink)  
Old September 18th 08, 10:44 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Phil Allison
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 927
Default Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, will it work?


"TT"

I'm building a 1x12" speaker cabinet to use with my guitar amp head. I
have all the thiele/small parameters for my speaker, and have used a
program called BandBox Pro to design the speaker cabinet. I have also used
a program called WinIsd to check and both programs give me similiar
results.

I already have built a 150 litre cabinet to use with my speaker. I want to
tune my bassreflex box to 65Hz. The program says that with my rear baffle
thickness of 18mm, and 2 flush ends (I'm using a hole in the rear baffle
for port) I need to make a hole 300mm in diameter, to tune the box to
65Hz.

The port would be larger in diameter than my speaker, which is 279mm. Will
this kind of design work?



** Yes.

I built two such tuned cabinets 30 years ago - with 3 x 12 inch, low cost,
16 ohm guitar speakers in a 250 litre box.

With a horn tweeter on top and driven by a Rotel 1210 amplifier, they were
used for a " disco' system by a church social group.

The only complaint I had was there was actually so much bass the tone
controls were turned back to tame it a bit.


The program says that if I use 4 ports, 100mm each is sufficient, will
this work either? Is there any difference?



** Yes it also works and there is very little difference.



..... Phil





  #3 (permalink)  
Old September 18th 08, 10:45 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,822
Default Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, willit work?

TT wrote:
Hi

I'm building a 1x12" speaker cabinet to use with my guitar amp head. I have
all the thiele/small parameters for my speaker, and have used a program
called BandBox Pro to design the speaker cabinet. I have also used a program
called WinIsd to check and both programs give me similiar results.

I already have built a 150 litre cabinet to use with my speaker. I want to
tune my bassreflex box to 65Hz. The program says that with my rear baffle
thickness of 18mm, and 2 flush ends (I'm using a hole in the rear baffle for
port) I need to make a hole 300mm in diameter, to tune the box to 65Hz.

The port would be larger in diameter than my speaker, which is 279mm. Will
this kind of design work?
The program says that if I use 4 ports, 100mm each is sufficient, will this
work either? Is there any difference?

Thanks for answers!

TT



This is not how guitar speakers are designed. Reflex speakers are
generally poor guitar designs, which should be dropping fairly fast from
about 100Hz, and with some nice hefty peaks up at a few kHz. Go for a
fully sealed box if it is fairly big, or for a smaller cabinet, have
about half of the back panel open.

High fidelity and flat response are NOT what you need for this job.

d
  #4 (permalink)  
Old September 18th 08, 10:47 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
TT[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, will it work?


"Phil Allison" wrote in message
...

"TT"

I'm building a 1x12" speaker cabinet to use with my guitar amp head. I
have all the thiele/small parameters for my speaker, and have used a
program called BandBox Pro to design the speaker cabinet. I have also
used a program called WinIsd to check and both programs give me similiar
results.

I already have built a 150 litre cabinet to use with my speaker. I want
to tune my bassreflex box to 65Hz. The program says that with my rear
baffle thickness of 18mm, and 2 flush ends (I'm using a hole in the rear
baffle for port) I need to make a hole 300mm in diameter, to tune the box
to 65Hz.

The port would be larger in diameter than my speaker, which is 279mm.
Will this kind of design work?



** Yes.

I built two such tuned cabinets 30 years ago - with 3 x 12 inch, low
cost, 16 ohm guitar speakers in a 250 litre box.

With a horn tweeter on top and driven by a Rotel 1210 amplifier, they were
used for a " disco' system by a church social group.

The only complaint I had was there was actually so much bass the tone
controls were turned back to tame it a bit.


The program says that if I use 4 ports, 100mm each is sufficient, will
this work either? Is there any difference?



** Yes it also works and there is very little difference.



.... Phil


Hi Phil,

Many thanks for your answer! I'll give my speaker cab a try then.

Cheers!

TT


  #5 (permalink)  
Old September 18th 08, 12:54 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
TT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 127
Default Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, will it work?


"TT" wrote in message ...

You're using my name :-( Is it just a coincidence or are you doing it for a
particular reason?

Cheers TT


  #6 (permalink)  
Old September 19th 08, 08:40 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Stephen McLuckie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, willit work?

Don Pearce wrote:


This is not how guitar speakers are designed. Reflex speakers are
generally poor guitar designs, which should be dropping fairly fast from
about 100Hz, and with some nice hefty peaks up at a few kHz. Go for a
fully sealed box if it is fairly big, or for a smaller cabinet, have
about half of the back panel open.

High fidelity and flat response are NOT what you need for this job.


This is true. Also, 150 litres is ridiculously large for a 1x 12 guitar speaker. I have a 12" JBL in a 40-litre cabinet for my bass!

The problem with using WinIsd and similar programs is that you must know the target respons of your planned system, i.e. the frequency response you are aiming to achieve. Otherwise, it will often suggest an over-large box that is useless. Which, if I am not very much mistaken, is what you are going to end up with.

Use a speaker designed for guitar and get the manufacturer's cabinet recommendations. Easy.

Stephen
  #7 (permalink)  
Old September 19th 08, 08:54 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Eiron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 782
Default Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, willit work?

Stephen McLuckie wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:


This is not how guitar speakers are designed. Reflex speakers are
generally poor guitar designs, which should be dropping fairly fast
from about 100Hz, and with some nice hefty peaks up at a few kHz. Go
for a fully sealed box if it is fairly big, or for a smaller cabinet,
have about half of the back panel open.

High fidelity and flat response are NOT what you need for this job.


This is true. Also, 150 litres is ridiculously large for a 1x 12 guitar
speaker. I have a 12" JBL in a 40-litre cabinet for my bass!

The problem with using WinIsd and similar programs is that you must know
the target respons of your planned system, i.e. the frequency response
you are aiming to achieve. Otherwise, it will often suggest an
over-large box that is useless.


WinISD will allow you to tweak the box and port size, and show the
frequency response graph.
So there's no problem.

--
Eiron.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old September 19th 08, 10:26 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
TT[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, will it work?


"TT" wrote in message
...

"TT" wrote in message ...

You're using my name :-( Is it just a coincidence or are you doing it for
a particular reason?

Cheers TT

I didn't know there already was a guy named "TT". Coincidence yes, my
initials are "TT".

TT


  #9 (permalink)  
Old September 19th 08, 01:22 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Phil Allison
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 927
Default Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, will it work?


"Eiron"

WinISD will allow you to tweak the box and port size, and show the
frequency response graph.
So there's no problem.



** Exactly.

The default (ideal) response curve and box volume / tuning frequency
supplied by WinISD are only a starting point.

One can usually almost halve the box volume and fiddle with the tuning
frequency and still get an perfectly acceptable result with most modern LF
drivers.

Play the same game with 4th order BP boxes and you will have lots of fun.




...... Phil



  #10 (permalink)  
Old September 19th 08, 04:08 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
TT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 127
Default Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, will it work?


"TT" wrote in message ...

"TT" wrote in message
...

"TT" wrote in message ...

You're using my name :-( Is it just a coincidence or are you doing it
for a particular reason?

Cheers TT

I didn't know there already was a guy named "TT". Coincidence yes, my
initials are "TT".

TT


I have posted here on and off for a couple of years now so please check. I
would suggest to you that it may be a little confusing for others, so
perhaps, it would be in our best interests if you made a slight alteration
to your posting identity so as to not have any confusion. BTW as you will
see from my munged real email address I am quite legitimate in who and what
I say I am. If you wish to contact me off group remove the "nospam" from my
email.

Cheers TT (the original one) :-))


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.