![]() |
help with speaker configuration
I am hoping that someone would be able to offer some insight into a
speaker configuration problem I'm having. I have built an mp3 jukebox and have installed 3 full range speakers into the cabinet (full range so I didn't have to bother with cross over networks). My amp delivers 70watts into 4Ohms, my speaker configuration consists of 2 x 50watt 8 Ohms speakers in one parallel leg(giving me 4 Ohms) and 1 80watt 4Ohms speaker in series with the parallel leg. So 2 x 4Ohms in series gives me 8Ohms. This ofcourse should mean my amp will deliver only half its stated output (therefore, should be delivering 35watts). My problem is the lager 4Ohms 80watt speaker that is in series with the parallel leg has burn't out. I have no idea why. ----8Ohms---- (50watts) | | | | ----8Ohms---- (50watts) | | | -------4Ohms------- (80watts) | | I read a similar reply recently that stated maybe its because the wattage is unbalanced or the number of speakers were unbalanced, resulting in the 4Ohms 80watt speaker doing double the work. Please help if you can, any insight into this problem would be greatly appreciated, its driving me nuts.. Thanks in advance Steve |
help with speaker configuration
1. YOu cannot be certain that the speaker ratings are accurate.
2. You cannot state that the 8ohm load will result in your amp supplying only half power. It depends on the current capability of the amp. 3. The so-called 80watt speaker is in series with the now 100watt pair and any power disipated goes through both. Kal On 28 Oct 2003 08:24:46 -0800, (steven robinson) wrote: I am hoping that someone would be able to offer some insight into a speaker configuration problem I'm having. I have built an mp3 jukebox and have installed 3 full range speakers into the cabinet (full range so I didn't have to bother with cross over networks). My amp delivers 70watts into 4Ohms, my speaker configuration consists of 2 x 50watt 8 Ohms speakers in one parallel leg(giving me 4 Ohms) and 1 80watt 4Ohms speaker in series with the parallel leg. So 2 x 4Ohms in series gives me 8Ohms. This ofcourse should mean my amp will deliver only half its stated output (therefore, should be delivering 35watts). My problem is the lager 4Ohms 80watt speaker that is in series with the parallel leg has burn't out. I have no idea why. ----8Ohms---- (50watts) | | | | ----8Ohms---- (50watts) | | | -------4Ohms------- (80watts) | | I read a similar reply recently that stated maybe its because the wattage is unbalanced or the number of speakers were unbalanced, resulting in the 4Ohms 80watt speaker doing double the work. Please help if you can, any insight into this problem would be greatly appreciated, its driving me nuts.. Thanks in advance Steve |
help with speaker configuration
In article , steven
robinson wrote: My problem is the lager 4Ohms 80watt speaker that is in series with the parallel leg has burn't out. I have no idea why. ----8Ohms---- (50watts) | | | | ----8Ohms---- (50watts) | | | -------4Ohms------- (80watts) | | I read a similar reply recently that stated maybe its because the wattage is unbalanced or the number of speakers were unbalanced, resulting in the 4Ohms 80watt speaker doing double the work. The main concern I have is that calling a speaker '4 Ohm' or '8 Ohm' is an entirely nominal value.The *actual* value of the impedance is likely to be very frequency dependent, and at some frequencies it may be a long way from the quoted nominal value. Putting dissimilar speaker units in series is a recipy for potential pun disaster for this reason... At some frequencies the impedance of one unit may be much higher than the nominal value, and the other(s) much lower. This mean mean the power is far from being distributed as you might assume from the 'nominal' values. Also: Since you are not using any crossover networks it may be that at - for example - low frequencies *all* your speakers have low impedances (thus drawing more current/power than you assume), and their values are such that most of the power ends up in one unit - which can then fail. To say more, I'd need to see impedance/frequency plots for each of the units. Another reason putting dissimilar units in series is often a bad idea is that each one (for the reason given above) will experience a drive voltage that is frequency dependent. Thus the resulting overall output sound power/frequency response is likely to be changed. Each unit *used and driven individually* might be acceptable as a broadband speaker, but combined, the results may be very different. There are also some other variables involved, so in general, I would not expect what you produced to sound particularly good, even if it survived! However this depends upon the units, and how they were fitted to the cabinets, etc, etc. Personally, I'd also use some kind of added network, just to define the impedance values. For example, some amplifiers may not like the load they see at LF or HF from a speaker of the kind you describe. This can also lead to trouble if the amp is not unconditionally stable. Also occurs to me to point out that when putting reactive components in series, the magnitudes of the voltages on each, if added, can actually add up to *more* than the total applied across them all. ( ;- ) So, again, this can be a recipy for problems... (The voltages add up as vector/complex values, and may be out of phase with each other, hence leading to this effect.) Please help if you can, any insight into this problem would be greatly appreciated, its driving me nuts.. Do you have impedance/frequency plots of the individual units? Any idea how these values were altered by the cabinets and/or combined useage? What amplifier did you use, and is it unconditionally stable? Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
help with speaker configuration
In article , steven
robinson wrote: My problem is the lager 4Ohms 80watt speaker that is in series with the parallel leg has burn't out. I have no idea why. ----8Ohms---- (50watts) | | | | ----8Ohms---- (50watts) | | | -------4Ohms------- (80watts) | | I read a similar reply recently that stated maybe its because the wattage is unbalanced or the number of speakers were unbalanced, resulting in the 4Ohms 80watt speaker doing double the work. The main concern I have is that calling a speaker '4 Ohm' or '8 Ohm' is an entirely nominal value.The *actual* value of the impedance is likely to be very frequency dependent, and at some frequencies it may be a long way from the quoted nominal value. Putting dissimilar speaker units in series is a recipy for potential pun disaster for this reason... At some frequencies the impedance of one unit may be much higher than the nominal value, and the other(s) much lower. This mean mean the power is far from being distributed as you might assume from the 'nominal' values. Also: Since you are not using any crossover networks it may be that at - for example - low frequencies *all* your speakers have low impedances (thus drawing more current/power than you assume), and their values are such that most of the power ends up in one unit - which can then fail. To say more, I'd need to see impedance/frequency plots for each of the units. Another reason putting dissimilar units in series is often a bad idea is that each one (for the reason given above) will experience a drive voltage that is frequency dependent. Thus the resulting overall output sound power/frequency response is likely to be changed. Each unit *used and driven individually* might be acceptable as a broadband speaker, but combined, the results may be very different. There are also some other variables involved, so in general, I would not expect what you produced to sound particularly good, even if it survived! However this depends upon the units, and how they were fitted to the cabinets, etc, etc. Personally, I'd also use some kind of added network, just to define the impedance values. For example, some amplifiers may not like the load they see at LF or HF from a speaker of the kind you describe. This can also lead to trouble if the amp is not unconditionally stable. Also occurs to me to point out that when putting reactive components in series, the magnitudes of the voltages on each, if added, can actually add up to *more* than the total applied across them all. ( ;- ) So, again, this can be a recipy for problems... (The voltages add up as vector/complex values, and may be out of phase with each other, hence leading to this effect.) Please help if you can, any insight into this problem would be greatly appreciated, its driving me nuts.. Do you have impedance/frequency plots of the individual units? Any idea how these values were altered by the cabinets and/or combined useage? What amplifier did you use, and is it unconditionally stable? Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
help with speaker configuration
In article , Kalman Rubinson
wrote: 3. The so-called 80watt speaker is in series with the now 100watt pair and any power disipated goes through both. Not sure what you mean by the above. Can you clarify? Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
help with speaker configuration
In article , Kalman Rubinson
wrote: 3. The so-called 80watt speaker is in series with the now 100watt pair and any power disipated goes through both. Not sure what you mean by the above. Can you clarify? Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
help with speaker configuration
In article ,
steven robinson wrote: I read a similar reply recently that stated maybe its because the wattage is unbalanced or the number of speakers were unbalanced, resulting in the 4Ohms 80watt speaker doing double the work. Please help if you can, any insight into this problem would be greatly appreciated, its driving me nuts.. Speaker impedances are nominal and will vary with frequency and also from one to another of different types. So it's perfectly possible that the 4 ohm one is being asked to handle much more power at some frequencies than the other two than the simple resistance calculation suggests. Wiring speakers in series is not a good idea, anyway. Far better to use one amp per speaker. -- *It is wrong to ever split an infinitive * Dave Plowman London SW 12 RIP Acorn |
help with speaker configuration
In article ,
steven robinson wrote: I read a similar reply recently that stated maybe its because the wattage is unbalanced or the number of speakers were unbalanced, resulting in the 4Ohms 80watt speaker doing double the work. Please help if you can, any insight into this problem would be greatly appreciated, its driving me nuts.. Speaker impedances are nominal and will vary with frequency and also from one to another of different types. So it's perfectly possible that the 4 ohm one is being asked to handle much more power at some frequencies than the other two than the simple resistance calculation suggests. Wiring speakers in series is not a good idea, anyway. Far better to use one amp per speaker. -- *It is wrong to ever split an infinitive * Dave Plowman London SW 12 RIP Acorn |
help with speaker configuration
Jim Lesurf wrote in message ...
In article , steven robinson wrote: My problem is the lager 4Ohms 80watt speaker that is in series with the parallel leg has burn't out. I have no idea why. ----8Ohms---- (50watts) | | | | ----8Ohms---- (50watts) | | | -------4Ohms------- (80watts) | | I read a similar reply recently that stated maybe its because the wattage is unbalanced or the number of speakers were unbalanced, resulting in the 4Ohms 80watt speaker doing double the work. The main concern I have is that calling a speaker '4 Ohm' or '8 Ohm' is an entirely nominal value.The *actual* value of the impedance is likely to be very frequency dependent, and at some frequencies it may be a long way from the quoted nominal value. Putting dissimilar speaker units in series is a recipy for potential pun disaster for this reason... At some frequencies the impedance of one unit may be much higher than the nominal value, and the other(s) much lower. This mean mean the power is far from being distributed as you might assume from the 'nominal' values. Also: Since you are not using any crossover networks it may be that at - for example - low frequencies *all* your speakers have low impedances (thus drawing more current/power than you assume), and their values are such that most of the power ends up in one unit - which can then fail. To say more, I'd need to see impedance/frequency plots for each of the units. Another reason putting dissimilar units in series is often a bad idea is that each one (for the reason given above) will experience a drive voltage that is frequency dependent. Thus the resulting overall output sound power/frequency response is likely to be changed. Each unit *used and driven individually* might be acceptable as a broadband speaker, but combined, the results may be very different. There are also some other variables involved, so in general, I would not expect what you produced to sound particularly good, even if it survived! However this depends upon the units, and how they were fitted to the cabinets, etc, etc. Personally, I'd also use some kind of added network, just to define the impedance values. For example, some amplifiers may not like the load they see at LF or HF from a speaker of the kind you describe. This can also lead to trouble if the amp is not unconditionally stable. Also occurs to me to point out that when putting reactive components in series, the magnitudes of the voltages on each, if added, can actually add up to *more* than the total applied across them all. ( ;- ) So, again, this can be a recipy for problems... (The voltages add up as vector/complex values, and may be out of phase with each other, hence leading to this effect.) Please help if you can, any insight into this problem would be greatly appreciated, its driving me nuts.. Do you have impedance/frequency plots of the individual units? Any idea how these values were altered by the cabinets and/or combined useage? What amplifier did you use, and is it unconditionally stable? Slainte, Jim Hi Jim Thanks for the reply, a lot of what you are saying is foreign to me, but this is what I know: The spec of the 8Ohms 50watt speakers in the parallel leg a Nominal power 30watts Peak power 50watts SPL @ 1W/1m 82db Frequency range 100Hz to 20kHz Resonant Frequency 130Hz Max cone displacement 5mm Voice coil diameter 20mm Magnetic inductance 0.8 Tesla Magnetic flux 200u Weber Withount using cross overs how can I block damaging frequencies lower than 100Hz and higher than 20kHz from the drivers? or isn't that a concern? Unfortunately I don't know anything about the 4Ohms speaker, except its Peak power is 80watts. Likewise the amp is a bit of a mistery, it is an amp called a v-series manufactured by an amusement company in leeds. Its output is supposed to be 70watts into 4Ohms. I'm getting the impresion that putting dis-similat drivers in series is a bad idea. What if I put two 8Ohms in series twice and parallel them together, would this be a better idea? I could then use the same speakers with the same properties. In this configuration you would expect the output to be spread evenly across the four speakers, wouldn't you? What do you think? Thanks Steve |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk