A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

A new height of irony



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old March 17th 09, 10:06 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.tubes
roughplanet[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default A new height of irony

"atec 77" "atec 7 7 wrote in message news:gpo9
...

TT wrote:


Brian Gaff" wrote in message
. ..

Never mind folks as Msoft will not be shipping a news reader with
Windows 7, nobody will know Usenet exists anyway after that.


Do believe after the fiasco of Vista that anyone will actually go to
the next M$ operating system?


Well it is free if you know where to look


What service pack number is it up to already? And how many dodgy drivers
are included :-))


so far proving not to need them
installed ferpectly on a quad xeon (3 gig) with 11 gig ram and 6x174 gig
scsi...


It will take a lot to get me away from XP Pro ;-)


it's ok for a home o/s I guess
maybe you should try a real o/s from one of the unix areas ?


Why? If XP does everything that you need, who needs the steep learning
curve of (say) Linux?

I have been running Linux since before v1.0 came out, have written numerous
drivers
and several applications and even with Wine or VMWare am still unable to run
many of my Comms programs and so still require Win3.11, Win98SE and WinXP to
accommodate all of it.

Apart from that, because it's not in daily use, I sometimes need to look up
the command line instructions if I want to change anything requiring root
privileges.
And that's from someone who began using the source code & compiling kernels
in 1991!

Linux is for people with a mainframe (Unix) background or a university
degree in IT. It is not for Mr & Mrs Joe Average no matter what you say,
even if the GUI's are becoming more user friendly every day. Try getting a
novice to install (say) Apache, or even find & install Midnight Commander on
their Linux box & you'll see what I mean.

ruff


  #22 (permalink)  
Old March 17th 09, 10:32 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.tubes
KeithR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default A new height of irony

roughplanet wrote:
"atec 77" "atec 7 7 wrote in message
...

TT wrote:

"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
. ..


Never mind folks as Msoft will not be shipping a news reader with
Windows 7, nobody will know Usenet exists anyway after that.


Do believe after the fiasco of Vista that anyone will actually go to the
next M$ operating system?


Well it is free if you know where to look


That is, until one late night when you've misplaced your glasses you allow
Micro$oft's Genuine Advantage so-called 'update' download onto your machine
& then up comes a message that says that the software isn't genuine & the
screen changes to black!

Great stuff. But a $225.00 purchase of a genuine Micro$soft WinXP will
alleviate the problem, and after all, everyone should own at least one
genuine copy.

ruff


He's talking about a free beta which self-destructs in August. I've been
trying it, it's not too bad, a lot better than Vista, but I'll stick
with my XP pro for now. Linux is OK but Photoshop doesn't run too well
under it and The Gimp is a pretty poor substitute. Its also kind of
difficult to develop C# apps under Linux.

Keith









  #23 (permalink)  
Old March 17th 09, 10:35 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.tubes
KeithR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default A new height of irony

Brian Gaff wrote:
Never mind folks as Msoft will not be shipping a news reader with Windows 7,
nobody will know Usenet exists anyway after that.
Brian

Anybody too lazy to download Thunderbird (for free) deserves everything
that they get.

Keith
  #24 (permalink)  
Old March 17th 09, 10:45 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.tubes
roughplanet[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default A new height of irony

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"George M. Middiot" wrote in
message

My Master and Commander just demanded that it be made Ethics
Commissioner for Usenet's audio groups.


As usual Middiot, you are very confused. My recent discussion with some of
the lesser members of the Middiot Posse related to cowardice, not ethics.
Of course as Senior Coward of the Middiot Posse, you would like to
obfuscate that fact.

Middiot, I wonder why you are still soldiering on after all these years?
At this point, you've rendered RAO totally useless for any reasonable
purpose at all. It appears that Bill Gates is going to render all of
Usenet useless with the next release of Windows. You've put forth all
these years of effort, and what you are left with is *nothing*.


What a self opiniated, argumentative, ignorant, religious zealot you are
Krooborg.
If prizes were given out for the most unpopular person on Usenet, you'd win
in a landslide.

You have the personality of Ghengis Khan, the IQ of a fencepost & the
bravado of Tom Cruise all rolled into one unholy mess (pun intended).

You have been shown to be a total fool on numerous occassions, confusing me
with TT, and sundry others as well, and your many blunders in arguments
about matters audio are nothing short of legendary.

I'm surprised you still have the hide to even show your face on this and
other newsgroups. I guess that just indicates your level of stupidity.

Why don't you do the right thing & just end your miserable life, thus
pleasing hundreds if not thousands of people. It's the only way you'll ever
achieve any level of. popularity.

Goodbye & thanks for the fish. NOT!

ruff



  #25 (permalink)  
Old March 17th 09, 10:56 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.tubes
TT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 127
Default A new height of irony


"roughplanet" wrote in message
u...
"TT" wrote in message
...

"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
. ..

Never mind folks as Msoft will not be shipping a news
reader with Windows 7, nobody will know Usenet exists
anyway after that.
Brian


Do believe after the fiasco of Vista that anyone will
actually go to the next M$ operating system?


Did you TT?


No, not me. But I do have two daughters with Vista on their
laptops that I am the IT "eggspurt" for ;-) They use it as
a word processor and email/MSN device only. And because it
keeps asking them for admin rights they don't get to change
anything. Oh and they think it looks pretty ;-)

I don't know anybody who bought it who is still using it.
I have had 3 computers running XP since 2002 and none of
them have even come close to falling over.


Same here, 3 desktops and 2 laptops. I have even bought a
new Dell (El Cheapo for work) and *paid* to roll Vista back!


Why would you change?


Exactly. But I do have a mate that has just gone Apple.
Well that was an interesting exercise to say the least. He
keeps asking me if I know how to get things working. M$
maybe a PITA but at least I know how to stop making it itch
;-)

Cheers TT


  #26 (permalink)  
Old March 18th 09, 04:55 AM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.tubes
roughplanet[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default A new height of irony

"keithr" wrote in message
...

roughplanet wrote:

"atec 77" "atec 7 7 wrote in message
...

TT wrote:

"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
. ..

Never mind folks as Msoft will not be shipping a news reader with
Windows 7, nobody will know Usenet exists anyway after that.


Do believe after the fiasco of Vista that anyone will actually go to
the next M$ operating system?


Well it is free if you know where to look


That is, until one late night when you've misplaced your glasses you
allow Micro$oft's Genuine Advantage so-called 'update' download onto your
machine & then up comes a message that says that the software isn't
genuine & the screen changes to black!

Great stuff. But a $225.00 purchase of a genuine Micro$soft WinXP will
alleviate the problem, and after all, everyone should own at least one
genuine copy.


He's talking about a free beta which self-destructs in August. I've been
trying it, it's not too bad, a lot better than Vista, but I'll stick with
my XP pro for now. Linux is OK but Photoshop doesn't run too well under it
and The Gimp is a pretty poor substitute. Its also kind of difficult to
develop C# apps under Linux.


Then use Python instead. It's a bloody sight easier to use & the outcomes,
in my experience, are pretty much the same, if a tad slower. Besides, you
can hang it on C++ code with a linker & voila! You have your app ready made
:-).

ruff


  #27 (permalink)  
Old March 18th 09, 04:57 AM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.tubes
roughplanet[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default A new height of irony

"keithr" wrote in message
...

Brian Gaff wrote:

Never mind folks as Msoft will not be shipping a news reader with Windows
7, nobody will know Usenet exists anyway after that.


Anybody too lazy to download Thunderbird (for free) deserves everything
that they get.


Hear hear, as well as Firefox. M$ deserve everything that happens to them.

ruff


  #28 (permalink)  
Old March 18th 09, 11:10 AM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.tubes
KeithR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default A new height of irony

roughplanet wrote:
"keithr" wrote in message
...

roughplanet wrote:

"atec 77" "atec 7 7 wrote in message
...

TT wrote:

"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
. ..

Never mind folks as Msoft will not be shipping a news reader with
Windows 7, nobody will know Usenet exists anyway after that.


Do believe after the fiasco of Vista that anyone will actually go to
the next M$ operating system?


Well it is free if you know where to look


That is, until one late night when you've misplaced your glasses you
allow Micro$oft's Genuine Advantage so-called 'update' download onto your
machine & then up comes a message that says that the software isn't
genuine & the screen changes to black!

Great stuff. But a $225.00 purchase of a genuine Micro$soft WinXP will
alleviate the problem, and after all, everyone should own at least one
genuine copy.


He's talking about a free beta which self-destructs in August. I've been
trying it, it's not too bad, a lot better than Vista, but I'll stick with
my XP pro for now. Linux is OK but Photoshop doesn't run too well under it
and The Gimp is a pretty poor substitute. Its also kind of difficult to
develop C# apps under Linux.


Then use Python instead. It's a bloody sight easier to use & the outcomes,
in my experience, are pretty much the same, if a tad slower. Besides, you
can hang it on C++ code with a linker & voila! You have your app ready made
:-).


Never tried Python, I make my living with C#, Delphi, a little Perl, and
a weird scripting language that probably not more than 20 people in the
world use (or want to use). They all require Windows.

I especially dislike C++ and Java, but I suspect that I will have to use
the latter at some point. I've been writing in Delphi on and off for the
last 14 years, but it is dying and C# is similar enough to seem familiar
(they were both architected by the same man)

I have used Linux on and off over the years, especially SUSE but never
for serious work.

Keith
  #29 (permalink)  
Old March 18th 09, 11:30 AM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,aus.hi-fi
Mark Harriss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11
Default A new height of irony

keithr wrote:

Never tried Python, I make my living with C#, Delphi, a little Perl, and
a weird scripting language that probably not more than 20 people in the
world use (or want to use). They all require Windows.


Python is a really good interpreted programming language:
With careful design I've written image processing software with a GUI
that was developed and tested on a Linux box, used on a Mac running OSX
and could run on a windows PC. It ran on all three without modification.

The commercial version of python is a lot faster than the free version
which is no slouch either. Printing is still a bit of a pain though.


I especially dislike C++ and Java, but I suspect that I will have to use
the latter at some point. I've been writing in Delphi on and off for the
last 14 years, but it is dying and C# is similar enough to seem familiar
(they were both architected by the same man)



Python being a loosely typed language, you could consider it the
exact opposite of Java which I despise as being the most uptight anal
language I've ever been forced to use. It was written by control freaks
for control freaks. I find C and C++ far easier to use than Java.
  #30 (permalink)  
Old March 19th 09, 02:45 AM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,aus.hi-fi
roughplanet[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default A new height of irony

"Mark Harriss" wrote in message
. au...

keithr wrote:

Never tried Python, I make my living with C#, Delphi, a little Perl, and
a weird scripting language that probably not more than 20 people in the
world use (or want to use). They all require Windows.


Python is a really good interpreted programming language:
With careful design I've written image processing software with a GUI
that was developed and tested on a Linux box, used on a Mac running OSX
and could run on a windows PC. It ran on all three without modification.

The commercial version of python is a lot faster than the free version
which is no slouch either. Printing is still a bit of a pain though.


Yes it is Mark, but as you say, the printing commands still need work even
after 12 years of development.

I especially dislike C++ and Java, but I suspect that I will have to use
the latter at some point. I've been writing in Delphi on and off for the
last 14 years, but it is dying and C# is similar enough to seem familiar
(they were both architected by the same man)


Python being a loosely typed language, you could consider it the
exact opposite of Java which I despise as being the most uptight anal
language I've ever been forced to use. It was written by control freaks
for control freaks. I find C and C++ far easier to use than Java.


Hear bloody hear. Python is a dream language with little or no constructs to
observe.
Java was written by an anally retentive control freak for anally retentive
control freaks, and although I prefer the freedom of scripting languages,
like Python or Perl, I would rather code in C++ than Java anyday!

ruff


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.