A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Frequency response of the ear



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old April 17th 09, 11:50 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Phil Allison
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 927
Default Frequency response of the ear


"Arny Krueger"

Do some homework, first. Google gives 100,000 hits for "dummy head
recording".



** Nope - its only 1750 hits for the phrase.




...... Phil





  #2 (permalink)  
Old April 17th 09, 12:08 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,151
Default Frequency response of the ear


"Phil Allison" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger"

Do some homework, first. Google gives 100,000 hits for "dummy head
recording".



** Nope - its only 1750 hits for the phrase.




I get 1,730

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/dummy.jpg


(I learned a long time ago to take Arnie's claims with a shovelful of salt -
he's like a lot of people who try to *speak with authority* when most of the
time they've no idea..!!! ;-)

  #3 (permalink)  
Old April 17th 09, 12:42 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Phil Allison
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 927
Default Frequency response of the ear


"Keith Git"
"Phil Allison"
"Arny Krueger"

Do some homework, first. Google gives 100,000 hits for "dummy head
recording".



** Nope - its only 1750 hits for the phrase.



I get 1,730



** Google is censoring about 20 hits from your delicate eyes ....


(I learned a long time ago to take Arnie's claims with a shovelful of
salt - he's like a lot of people who try to *speak with authority* when
most of the time they've no idea..!!! ;-)



** Arny is a compewter geek by nature and inclination.

Like any computer, he can only manipulate the data - but not illuminate
it.




....... Phil





  #4 (permalink)  
Old April 17th 09, 01:16 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,151
Default Frequency response of the ear


"Phil Anus Hole" wrote


** Google is censoring about 20 hits from your delicate eyes ....



That'll be my other half - she's probably got it set for *no titties* or
somesuch.....



(I learned a long time ago to take Arnie's claims with a shovelful of
salt - he's like a lot of people who try to *speak with authority* when
most of the time they've no idea..!!! ;-)



** Arny is a compewter geek by nature and inclination.

Like any computer, he can only manipulate the data - but not illuminate
it.



The evidence is he can't even do that accurately....



  #5 (permalink)  
Old April 17th 09, 02:30 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Dave Plowman (News)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,872
Default Frequency response of the ear

In article ,
Keith G wrote:

"Phil Anus Hole" wrote



** Google is censoring about 20 hits from your delicate eyes ....



That'll be my other half - she's probably got it set for *no titties* or
somesuch.....


(I learned a long time ago to take Arnie's claims with a shovelful of
salt - he's like a lot of people who try to *speak with authority*
when most of the time they've no idea..!!! ;-)



** Arny is a compewter geek by nature and inclination.

Like any computer, he can only manipulate the data - but not
illuminate it.



The evidence is he can't even do that accurately....


If you Google dummy head recording without the quotation marks you get
more than 100,000 hits.

I'm sure everyone will be fascinated by this.

--
*It's a thankless job, but I've got a lot of Karma to burn off

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old April 17th 09, 04:29 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,151
Default Frequency response of the ear


"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:

"Phil Anus Hole" wrote



** Google is censoring about 20 hits from your delicate eyes ....



That'll be my other half - she's probably got it set for *no titties* or
somesuch.....


(I learned a long time ago to take Arnie's claims with a shovelful of
salt - he's like a lot of people who try to *speak with authority*
when most of the time they've no idea..!!! ;-)


** Arny is a compewter geek by nature and inclination.

Like any computer, he can only manipulate the data - but not
illuminate it.



The evidence is he can't even do that accurately....


If you Google dummy head recording without the quotation marks you get
more than 100,000 hits.

I'm sure everyone will be fascinated by this.



I wouldn't bank on it.....



  #7 (permalink)  
Old April 17th 09, 07:58 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Eeyore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,415
Default Frequency response of the ear



"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:

If you Google dummy head recording without the quotation marks you get
more than 100,000 hits.


'about' 116,000 here


I'm sure everyone will be fascinated by this.


1,760 with the quote marks. Probably the number is changing because of the
natter in here.

Graham

  #8 (permalink)  
Old April 17th 09, 08:25 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Arny Krueger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,850
Default Frequency response of the ear

"Keith G" wrote in message


"Phil Anus Hole" wrote



That'll be my other half - she's probably got it set for
*no titties* or somesuch.....


(I learned a long time ago to take Arnie's claims with
a shovelful of salt - he's like a lot of people who try
to *speak with authority* when most of the time they've
no idea..!!! ;-)


Joke, as the truth is quite definately otherwise.

** Arny is a compewter geek by nature and inclination.


Phil is just upset that I invented ABX tests of of audio equipment, while he
could do no better than write an article praising it.

Like any computer, he can only manipulate the data - but not illuminate
it.


The evidence is he can't even do that accurately....


Particularly when people entertain themselves by misinterpreting what was
written.

By this time someone has figured out that the quotes were there to delimit
the search text from the rest of the text, not to define the actual search
string.


  #9 (permalink)  
Old April 17th 09, 10:03 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,151
Default Frequency response of the ear


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


"Phil Anus Hole" wrote



That'll be my other half - she's probably got it set for
*no titties* or somesuch.....


(I learned a long time ago to take Arnie's claims with
a shovelful of salt - he's like a lot of people who try
to *speak with authority* when most of the time they've
no idea..!!! ;-)


Joke, as the truth is quite definately otherwise.



Might want to check your spelling there (no typo - keys too far apart)....


Particularly when people entertain themselves by misinterpreting what was
written.

By this time someone has figured out that the quotes were there to delimit
the search text from the rest of the text, not to define the actual search
string.



It's your own fault, you should have made your point more clearly with the
phrase 'sans quotes' or somesuch - or maybe just have tidied your search up
in the first place?


  #10 (permalink)  
Old April 18th 09, 02:24 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Phil Allison
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 927
Default Frequency response of the ear


"Arny Krueger"
"Phil Allison"
** Arny is a compewter geek by nature and inclination.

Like any computer, he can only manipulate the data - but not illuminate
it.


Phil is just upset that I invented ABX tests of of audio equipment, while
he could do no better than write an article praising it.



** Well, goodness me - Arny has just provided us all with a perfect
example of exactly what I just complained about him.

I did NOT write that article on the ESP site in order to praise ABX
testing,
but rather to BURY it !!
---------------------------

Here is the link, please read it and if at all possible carry out the simple
test
it describes.

http://sound.westhost.com/absw.htm

Once set up, the test result is immediately apparent, definitive and
convincing to all but the congenitally mentally retarded - naturally,
the latter group includes all you audiophools.

This is of course entirely unlike the long, tedious, complicated &
ultimately
unconvincing statistical method used by the literal thinking Arny.



...... Phil



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.