Phil Allison
 

"Rob" wrote in message
om...
TT wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message
om...
TT wrote:
"cd" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:19:38 +0100, "Godfrey Wilkes"
wrote:

"cd" wrote in message
...
Do you have a family history of Tourettes?
How did it spread to your hands?
Best not to feed the trolls but here's an interesting link on the
subject:

http://members.iinet.com.au/~rutlidge/alanindex.html

But there are trolls and TROLLS.

Phil is actually *so* amusing.
Let's just get this absolutely correct here CD! First off, the author
of the link, Alan Rutlidge (who is a personal friend of mine) has had
an exasperating time with Philthy (Phil Allison's pet name) and
everything written in that is correct and all the quotes of Philthy's
are his. If in doubt search the archives.

Obviously, little of that page makes any sense without context. Your
point relates to PA's medical condition.

Philthy is a netstalking psychopath and Bipolar suffer.
How do you know this? Are you (and Arrny) qualified to make a medical
diagnosis?

Philthy at one
stage even *paid for* a corporate search on Alan's business and then
rang and harassed Alan's business partner! Unproved but there is
strong suspicion here even wrote letters to Alan's local council and
complained that his business was not operating within the zoning
restrictions!

OK

I have known Philthy online for many years now and can assure you that
he is not a nice person at all. It is easy to be lulled into a sense
of his outlandish behaviour is a little humorous or good natured as
with someone like Billy Connolly but I can assure you there is nothing
but malice hiding behind it.

Your evidence is that suspicion, above? And you link that suspicion to a
medical condition. Have I got this right? Continuing.

Philthy is a social outcast, he is nearly 60 years old and lives alone
in a rented flat and as far as women goes he is still a virgin. He had
a strong Catholic upbringing and went to Kogarah Maris Brothers school
where it is strongly suspected he was "got at" by one of them and so
explaining his disposition now. He is very intelligent but has *NO*
formal qualifications, not even a driver's licence and he even dropped
out of (thrown out of?) a fully funded scholarship in Engineering at
Sydney Uni in the early1970's. The real reason has never been
discovered but the common belief is there was an incident, with a male
lecturer in the orchestra pit ;-) Apparently he lecturer was also
dismissed.

Is any of that supposed to be funny or incriminating?

Philthy operates a hobby business from his kitchen table in his rented
flat repairing various bits of electronic gear that obviously
subsidises what ever benefits he is on.

Again - what's the point of that sentence. Is anyone supposed to draw
something negative?

His hi-fi gear consists of an ancient Sony CDP-101 (the first CD player
on the market), Aiwa tuner, some old guitar amps, some kit speakers and
sometimes a loaned set of Quad ESL57s or 63s, various other bits of
curbside collectable rubbish and about 80CDs. There is also a very
amusing story of when Philthy bought some dodgy Quad ESL 63s and had to
sue the dealer to get his money back after he tinkered with then. But
we will save that for another day ;-)

Please, do.

So basically you are dealing with a sad and pathetic excuse for a human
being whose whole life is an abject failure! He even wrote once how he
was smarter than a friend of his he went to school with (Jim
Prendergast) who is a PhD. This bitter and twisted waste of space and
oxygen thief tries to make himself important by being this big and
knowledgeable expert online.

Really.

My advice is to killfile him and do not under any circumstances divulge
any personal information or have private contact with him because you
*will be* stalked. I know from personal experience :-(

Obviously, yes, killfile, no PhD needed.

It's rather difficult to sort out the basis of what you're saying. Are
you homophobic? Do you dislike people with mental health disabilities?
Have you the slightest idea about bipolar disorder? I think not. Find
out what it can be and reread what you've written, and reconsider how
incisive and astute you really are.

It would have been better if you'd stuck to what you know, and your
personal stalking experiences. It would have been nice if you'd just not
bothered, or simply passed on the killfile advice.

If there is anything about this you disbelieve or think I am even
exaggerating please do your own research and you will quickly see that
I am probably being too kind to him ;-)

Yes, quite magnanimous TT ;-)

Rob

I'm not entirely sure whether you are defending Philthy or having a go at
me for giving CD here a quick run down on Philthy's background.


Neither really, just trying unsuccessfully to clarify your onslaught.

Either way, it matters little to me. As with any information you may do
with it what you will.


As with any seemingly bigoted rant, I have.

Rob

May I enquire why *you* call me a bigot?

I have answered a relevant, on topic post, politely and courteously and try
and warn the OP of the *proven* and *documented* dangers of the person he
asked about and you a) try and defend the person b) malign me

For the record, it is not me that is the public menace.

Cheers TT

Phil Allison
 

TT wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message
om...
TT wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message
om...
TT wrote:
"cd" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:19:38 +0100, "Godfrey Wilkes"
wrote:

"cd" wrote in message
...
Do you have a family history of Tourettes?
How did it spread to your hands?
Best not to feed the trolls but here's an interesting link on the
subject:

http://members.iinet.com.au/~rutlidge/alanindex.html

But there are trolls and TROLLS.

Phil is actually *so* amusing.
Let's just get this absolutely correct here CD! First off, the author
of the link, Alan Rutlidge (who is a personal friend of mine) has had
an exasperating time with Philthy (Phil Allison's pet name) and
everything written in that is correct and all the quotes of Philthy's
are his. If in doubt search the archives.

Obviously, little of that page makes any sense without context. Your
point relates to PA's medical condition.

Philthy is a netstalking psychopath and Bipolar suffer.
How do you know this? Are you (and Arrny) qualified to make a medical
diagnosis?

Philthy at one
stage even *paid for* a corporate search on Alan's business and then
rang and harassed Alan's business partner! Unproved but there is
strong suspicion here even wrote letters to Alan's local council and
complained that his business was not operating within the zoning
restrictions!

OK

I have known Philthy online for many years now and can assure you that
he is not a nice person at all. It is easy to be lulled into a sense
of his outlandish behaviour is a little humorous or good natured as
with someone like Billy Connolly but I can assure you there is nothing
but malice hiding behind it.

Your evidence is that suspicion, above? And you link that suspicion to a
medical condition. Have I got this right? Continuing.

Philthy is a social outcast, he is nearly 60 years old and lives alone
in a rented flat and as far as women goes he is still a virgin. He had
a strong Catholic upbringing and went to Kogarah Maris Brothers school
where it is strongly suspected he was "got at" by one of them and so
explaining his disposition now. He is very intelligent but has *NO*
formal qualifications, not even a driver's licence and he even dropped
out of (thrown out of?) a fully funded scholarship in Engineering at
Sydney Uni in the early1970's. The real reason has never been
discovered but the common belief is there was an incident, with a male
lecturer in the orchestra pit ;-) Apparently he lecturer was also
dismissed.

Is any of that supposed to be funny or incriminating?

Philthy operates a hobby business from his kitchen table in his rented
flat repairing various bits of electronic gear that obviously
subsidises what ever benefits he is on.

Again - what's the point of that sentence. Is anyone supposed to draw
something negative?

His hi-fi gear consists of an ancient Sony CDP-101 (the first CD player
on the market), Aiwa tuner, some old guitar amps, some kit speakers and
sometimes a loaned set of Quad ESL57s or 63s, various other bits of
curbside collectable rubbish and about 80CDs. There is also a very
amusing story of when Philthy bought some dodgy Quad ESL 63s and had to
sue the dealer to get his money back after he tinkered with then. But
we will save that for another day ;-)

Please, do.

So basically you are dealing with a sad and pathetic excuse for a human
being whose whole life is an abject failure! He even wrote once how he
was smarter than a friend of his he went to school with (Jim
Prendergast) who is a PhD. This bitter and twisted waste of space and
oxygen thief tries to make himself important by being this big and
knowledgeable expert online.

Really.

My advice is to killfile him and do not under any circumstances divulge
any personal information or have private contact with him because you
*will be* stalked. I know from personal experience :-(

Obviously, yes, killfile, no PhD needed.

It's rather difficult to sort out the basis of what you're saying. Are
you homophobic? Do you dislike people with mental health disabilities?
Have you the slightest idea about bipolar disorder? I think not. Find
out what it can be and reread what you've written, and reconsider how
incisive and astute you really are.

It would have been better if you'd stuck to what you know, and your
personal stalking experiences. It would have been nice if you'd just not
bothered, or simply passed on the killfile advice.

If there is anything about this you disbelieve or think I am even
exaggerating please do your own research and you will quickly see that
I am probably being too kind to him ;-)

Yes, quite magnanimous TT ;-)

Rob
I'm not entirely sure whether you are defending Philthy or having a go at
me for giving CD here a quick run down on Philthy's background.

Neither really, just trying unsuccessfully to clarify your onslaught.

Either way, it matters little to me. As with any information you may do
with it what you will.

As with any seemingly bigoted rant, I have.

Rob

May I enquire why *you* call me a bigot?


It should be obvious if you read my questions. I note of course that you
haven't answered any.

I have answered a relevant, on topic post, politely and courteously and try
and warn the OP of the *proven* and *documented* dangers of the person he
asked about and you a) try and defend the person b) malign me


I'm asking you to elaborate on the proof and documents. I'm not
defending Phil and you malign yourself.

For the record, it is not me that is the public menace.


Well, not *the* public menace, granted ;-)

Rob

Phil Allison
 

[arguments snipped]
Well Phil must be very pleased that you are fighting over him.
I wish I hadn't started this - please leave it now.

Phil Allison
 

"Rob" wrote in message
TT wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message
om...
TT wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message
om...
TT wrote:
"cd" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:19:38 +0100, "Godfrey Wilkes"
wrote:

"cd" wrote in message
...
Do you have a family history of Tourettes?
How did it spread to your hands?
Best not to feed the trolls but here's an interesting link on the
subject:

http://members.iinet.com.au/~rutlidge/alanindex.html

But there are trolls and TROLLS.

Phil is actually *so* amusing.
Let's just get this absolutely correct here CD! First off, the
author of the link, Alan Rutlidge (who is a personal friend of mine)
has had an exasperating time with Philthy (Phil Allison's pet name)
and everything written in that is correct and all the quotes of
Philthy's are his. If in doubt search the archives.

Obviously, little of that page makes any sense without context. Your
point relates to PA's medical condition.

Philthy is a netstalking psychopath and Bipolar suffer.
How do you know this? Are you (and Arrny) qualified to make a medical
diagnosis?

Philthy at one
stage even *paid for* a corporate search on Alan's business and then
rang and harassed Alan's business partner! Unproved but there is
strong suspicion here even wrote letters to Alan's local council and
complained that his business was not operating within the zoning
restrictions!

OK

I have known Philthy online for many years now and can assure you
that he is not a nice person at all. It is easy to be lulled into a
sense of his outlandish behaviour is a little humorous or good
natured as with someone like Billy Connolly but I can assure you
there is nothing but malice hiding behind it.

Your evidence is that suspicion, above? And you link that suspicion to
a medical condition. Have I got this right? Continuing.

Philthy is a social outcast, he is nearly 60 years old and lives
alone in a rented flat and as far as women goes he is still a virgin.
He had a strong Catholic upbringing and went to Kogarah Maris
Brothers school where it is strongly suspected he was "got at" by one
of them and so explaining his disposition now. He is very
intelligent but has *NO* formal qualifications, not even a driver's
licence and he even dropped out of (thrown out of?) a fully funded
scholarship in Engineering at Sydney Uni in the early1970's. The real
reason has never been discovered but the common belief is there was
an incident, with a male lecturer in the orchestra pit ;-)
Apparently he lecturer was also dismissed.

Is any of that supposed to be funny or incriminating?

Philthy operates a hobby business from his kitchen table in his
rented flat repairing various bits of electronic gear that obviously
subsidises what ever benefits he is on.

Again - what's the point of that sentence. Is anyone supposed to draw
something negative?

His hi-fi gear consists of an ancient Sony CDP-101 (the first CD
player on the market), Aiwa tuner, some old guitar amps, some kit
speakers and sometimes a loaned set of Quad ESL57s or 63s, various
other bits of curbside collectable rubbish and about 80CDs. There is
also a very amusing story of when Philthy bought some dodgy Quad ESL
63s and had to sue the dealer to get his money back after he tinkered
with then. But we will save that for another day ;-)

Please, do.

So basically you are dealing with a sad and pathetic excuse for a
human being whose whole life is an abject failure! He even wrote
once how he was smarter than a friend of his he went to school with
(Jim Prendergast) who is a PhD. This bitter and twisted waste of
space and oxygen thief tries to make himself important by being this
big and knowledgeable expert online.

Really.

My advice is to killfile him and do not under any circumstances
divulge any personal information or have private contact with him
because you *will be* stalked. I know from personal experience :-(

Obviously, yes, killfile, no PhD needed.

It's rather difficult to sort out the basis of what you're saying. Are
you homophobic? Do you dislike people with mental health disabilities?
Have you the slightest idea about bipolar disorder? I think not. Find
out what it can be and reread what you've written, and reconsider how
incisive and astute you really are.

It would have been better if you'd stuck to what you know, and your
personal stalking experiences. It would have been nice if you'd just
not bothered, or simply passed on the killfile advice.

If there is anything about this you disbelieve or think I am even
exaggerating please do your own research and you will quickly see
that I am probably being too kind to him ;-)

Yes, quite magnanimous TT ;-)

Rob
I'm not entirely sure whether you are defending Philthy or having a go
at me for giving CD here a quick run down on Philthy's background.

Neither really, just trying unsuccessfully to clarify your onslaught.

Either way, it matters little to me. As with any information you may
do with it what you will.

As with any seemingly bigoted rant, I have.

Rob

May I enquire why *you* call me a bigot?


It should be obvious if you read my questions. I note of course that you
haven't answered any.

Perhaps re-ask and this time leave out any snide remarks ;-)


I have answered a relevant, on topic post, politely and courteously and
try and warn the OP of the *proven* and *documented* dangers of the
person he asked about and you a) try and defend the person b) malign me


I'm asking you to elaborate on the proof and documents.

The proof is Philthy's own words and the documentation is the Google
Archives. See below as an example.

http://groups.google.com/group/aus.e...e=source&hl=en
here is where Philthy talks about his schooling and being a Uni drop out.
Feel free to do your own research yourself *IF* you think I have in anyway
mislead you or anyone else.

I'm not defending Phil and you malign yourself.

Please elaborate how I malign myself. I am having a polite and civil
conversation with you as I do 99% of the time with people I meet on Usenet
and I have answered a post discussing a person and my comments have been
civil and on topic.


For the record, it is not me that is the public menace.


Well, not *the* public menace, granted ;-)

Here you go again. Are you insinuating that I am some sort of other menace
then? If so, please state your grievences openly.

Cheers TT

Phil Allison
 

"cd" wrote in message
...
[arguments snipped]
Well Phil must be very pleased that you are fighting over him.
I wish I hadn't started this - please leave it now.

I hope your questions have been answered CD ;-) Please just leave him
alone and your Usenet travels will be far happier..

Cheers TT

Phil Allison
 

TT wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message
TT wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message
om...
TT wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message
om...
TT wrote:
"cd" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:19:38 +0100, "Godfrey Wilkes"
wrote:

"cd" wrote in message
...
Do you have a family history of Tourettes?
How did it spread to your hands?
Best not to feed the trolls but here's an interesting link on the
subject:

http://members.iinet.com.au/~rutlidge/alanindex.html

But there are trolls and TROLLS.

Phil is actually *so* amusing.
Let's just get this absolutely correct here CD! First off, the
author of the link, Alan Rutlidge (who is a personal friend of mine)
has had an exasperating time with Philthy (Phil Allison's pet name)
and everything written in that is correct and all the quotes of
Philthy's are his. If in doubt search the archives.

Obviously, little of that page makes any sense without context. Your
point relates to PA's medical condition.

Philthy is a netstalking psychopath and Bipolar suffer.
How do you know this? Are you (and Arrny) qualified to make a medical
diagnosis?

Philthy at one
stage even *paid for* a corporate search on Alan's business and then
rang and harassed Alan's business partner! Unproved but there is
strong suspicion here even wrote letters to Alan's local council and
complained that his business was not operating within the zoning
restrictions!

OK

I have known Philthy online for many years now and can assure you
that he is not a nice person at all. It is easy to be lulled into a
sense of his outlandish behaviour is a little humorous or good
natured as with someone like Billy Connolly but I can assure you
there is nothing but malice hiding behind it.

Your evidence is that suspicion, above? And you link that suspicion to
a medical condition. Have I got this right? Continuing.

Philthy is a social outcast, he is nearly 60 years old and lives
alone in a rented flat and as far as women goes he is still a virgin.
He had a strong Catholic upbringing and went to Kogarah Maris
Brothers school where it is strongly suspected he was "got at" by one
of them and so explaining his disposition now. He is very
intelligent but has *NO* formal qualifications, not even a driver's
licence and he even dropped out of (thrown out of?) a fully funded
scholarship in Engineering at Sydney Uni in the early1970's. The real
reason has never been discovered but the common belief is there was
an incident, with a male lecturer in the orchestra pit ;-)
Apparently he lecturer was also dismissed.

Is any of that supposed to be funny or incriminating?

Philthy operates a hobby business from his kitchen table in his
rented flat repairing various bits of electronic gear that obviously
subsidises what ever benefits he is on.

Again - what's the point of that sentence. Is anyone supposed to draw
something negative?

His hi-fi gear consists of an ancient Sony CDP-101 (the first CD
player on the market), Aiwa tuner, some old guitar amps, some kit
speakers and sometimes a loaned set of Quad ESL57s or 63s, various
other bits of curbside collectable rubbish and about 80CDs. There is
also a very amusing story of when Philthy bought some dodgy Quad ESL
63s and had to sue the dealer to get his money back after he tinkered
with then. But we will save that for another day ;-)

Please, do.

So basically you are dealing with a sad and pathetic excuse for a
human being whose whole life is an abject failure! He even wrote
once how he was smarter than a friend of his he went to school with
(Jim Prendergast) who is a PhD. This bitter and twisted waste of
space and oxygen thief tries to make himself important by being this
big and knowledgeable expert online.

Really.

My advice is to killfile him and do not under any circumstances
divulge any personal information or have private contact with him
because you *will be* stalked. I know from personal experience :-(

Obviously, yes, killfile, no PhD needed.

It's rather difficult to sort out the basis of what you're saying. Are
you homophobic? Do you dislike people with mental health disabilities?
Have you the slightest idea about bipolar disorder? I think not. Find
out what it can be and reread what you've written, and reconsider how
incisive and astute you really are.

It would have been better if you'd stuck to what you know, and your
personal stalking experiences. It would have been nice if you'd just
not bothered, or simply passed on the killfile advice.

If there is anything about this you disbelieve or think I am even
exaggerating please do your own research and you will quickly see
that I am probably being too kind to him ;-)

Yes, quite magnanimous TT ;-)

Rob
I'm not entirely sure whether you are defending Philthy or having a go
at me for giving CD here a quick run down on Philthy's background.

Neither really, just trying unsuccessfully to clarify your onslaught.

Either way, it matters little to me. As with any information you may
do with it what you will.

As with any seemingly bigoted rant, I have.

Rob
May I enquire why *you* call me a bigot?

It should be obvious if you read my questions. I note of course that you
haven't answered any.

Perhaps re-ask and this time leave out any snide remarks ;-)


You read what you want to read TT.

How do you know Phil's medical condition?

Do you think that Phil's medical condition as diagnosed is a cause for
his actions? Also, do you think it's a good idea to declare a medical
condition like this on the internet?

What is the relevance of the same sex encounter you claim Phil has had?

What relevance is Phil's occupation and employment status?

What relevance is Phil's tenure, age and religious background?

If your answers to any of these questions have anything to do with your
hatred of Phil, please explain.

I have answered a relevant, on topic post, politely and courteously and
try and warn the OP of the *proven* and *documented* dangers of the
person he asked about and you a) try and defend the person b) malign me

I'm asking you to elaborate on the proof and documents.

The proof is Philthy's own words and the documentation is the Google
Archives. See below as an example.

http://groups.google.com/group/aus.e...e=source&hl=en
here is where Philthy talks about his schooling and being a Uni drop out.
Feel free to do your own research yourself *IF* you think I have in anyway
mislead you or anyone else.


That post says Phil left University for financial and personal reasons.
You persecute him for that ('university dropout'). You really are a
prick TT. I work in a university and I see this most days. It's
heartbreaking, and you think it's a bit of a laugh, or something.

I don't think there's a single word of that post I disagree with. The
thing with PhDs is that they train you to *do* something - research in
the main. They are so focused they're not actually that useful in
themselves. And they're certainly not an even close measure of
intelligence (whatever that is, I don't know). How do you know about
PhDs by the way?

I'm not defending Phil and you malign yourself.

Please elaborate how I malign myself. I am having a polite and civil
conversation with you as I do 99% of the time with people I meet on Usenet
and I have answered a post discussing a person and my comments have been
civil and on topic.


In my view you'd be better *not* having a go at people unless you have a
decent reason. What I can't figure is what a person's age, sexuality,
tenure and so forth has to do with 'on topic'.

For the record, it is not me that is the public menace.

Well, not *the* public menace, granted ;-)

Here you go again. Are you insinuating that I am some sort of other menace
then? If so, please state your grievences openly.


No, no, you misunderstand. There are lots of public menaces - dog mess,
poor housing, Jon Gaunt, and so on.

However, I am insinuating that you're a bigot by asking you a series of
focused questions. I don't think it's stretching things too much to
suggest that if i've reason to believe that if you're a bigot in your
personal life, then you're a bigot in your private life.

I'm no saint by the way ;-)

Rob

Phil Allison
 

cd wrote:
[arguments snipped]
Well Phil must be very pleased that you are fighting over him.
I wish I hadn't started this - please leave it now.

Why did you start it cd?

Rob

Phil Allison
 

snipped for readability purposes


How do you know Phil's medical condition?

It has been openly discussed on and off groups and MDs have
offered their opinion.


Do you think that Phil's medical condition as diagnosed is
a cause for his actions?

Yes and a very nasty disposition mixed in for good measure.

Also, do you think it's a good idea to declare a medical
condition like this on the internet?

Yes. He has freely discussed other people's medical
conditions and even disclosed a person's criminal record.


What is the relevance of the same sex encounter you claim
Phil has had?

This explains his obsession with all things anal and his
homophobic tendencies.


What relevance is Phil's occupation and employment status?

It shows he lacks creditability. It also demonstrates why
he detests anyone with qualifications. The more highly
qualified someone is the more Philthy is likely to have a go
at them.


What relevance is Phil's tenure, age and religious
background?

It demonstrates why he has such a nasty disposion and why he
has so much time on his hands. Basically it says why he is
a grumpy old man ;-)


If your answers to any of these questions have anything to
do with your hatred of Phil, please explain.

My dislike of your pal is solely because how he treats
people and because of the disgusting things he has written
about me, my family and my friends. Yes, it's personal.

http://groups.google.com/group/aus.e...e=source&hl=en
here is where Philthy talks about his schooling and being
a Uni drop out. Feel free to do your own research
yourself *IF* you think I have in anyway mislead you or
anyone else.


That post says Phil left University for financial and
personal reasons. You persecute him for that ('university
dropout').

See above about qualifications, it goes a long way as to
explaining why he is the way he is.

You really are a prick TT.

Your opinion and you get to keep it. So what title do
bestow on pal Philthy then? Saint? Misunderstood boy
genius? What?

I work in a university and I see this most days. It's
heartbreaking, and you think it's a bit of a laugh, or
something.

Oh quite the opposite actually. I think it is tragic waste
of a human life and an institutions rescoures.

I don't think there's a single word of that post I
disagree with. The thing with PhDs is that they train you
to *do* something - research in the main. They are so
focused they're not actually that useful in themselves.
And they're certainly not an even close measure of
intelligence (whatever that is, I don't know). How do you
know about PhDs by the way?

I haven't claimed any knowledge about PhDs. Except to say
that I am close to the universty scene as well ;-)

In my view you'd be better *not* having a go at people
unless you have a decent reason.

What about years of slander, libel and abuse and accusing me
of disgusting acts? Is that a valid reason in your opinion?

What I can't figure is what a person's age, sexuality,
tenure and so forth has to do with 'on topic'.


Ask CD why he started the thread then? He asked about
Philthy's family history and I *assumed* that would also
entail his background. I have stated the facts as I
undersatnd them. I also should mention many people seem to
agree with me ;-)

However, I am insinuating that you're a bigot by asking
you a series of focused questions. I don't think it's
stretching things too much to suggest that if i've reason
to believe that if you're a bigot in your personal life,
then you're a bigot in your private life.

No I am not a bigot, I just detest how Philthy interacts on
Usenet and how he has single handedly destroyed several
newsgroups.

I'm no saint by the way ;-)

I have not made a jugement call on that - yet ;-) Misguided
perhaps is all that I would say for the time being.

Now that I have honestly answered your questions how about
some of mine?

Do you condone Philthy's online actions?

Do you find them entertaining or enjoyable?

Are you a hypocrite in allowing Philthy to divulge personal
information online but not others about him?

Have you had an online encounter with Philthy yet?

Has he stalked you yet? (That's obviously a big NO)

Do you condone online stalking?

What is your plan to rid Usenet of malicious, abusive
nutcases like Phil Allison?

Do you *really* know what Philthy is like or are you just
assuming he can't be as bad as he seems?

Cheers TT

Phil Allison
 

"TT" wrote in message
...

snipped for readability purposes


How do you know Phil's medical condition?

It has been openly discussed on and off groups

Oh well, that's *real* evidence! (not :-()

and MDs have offered their opinion.

Then they shouldn't have done, that is a clear breach of medical ethics. In
any case unless they have treated him themselves their opinion counts for
little.


My dislike of your pal

When did Rob ever describe Phil as his "pal"? It seems to be a habit of
yours to claim that other people are "defending" someone when all they are
doing is objecting to your way of making ill-informed judgements about other
people.

I kill-filed Phil a long time ago because, although he has much to
contribute, I am not prepared to correspond with anyone who's response to
any post that contradicts his views is to launch into a barrage of foul
language. That's all I need to do, and if everyone did that he would
effectively cease to exist as far as Usenet is concerned. Producing
web-sites devoted to him, along with quack "diagnosis" of his medical
condition is IMHO utterly inappropriate.

David.

Phil Allison
 

TT wrote:
snipped for readability purposes


How do you know Phil's medical condition?

It has been openly discussed on and off groups and MDs have
offered their opinion.


I'm afraid I simply don't believe that a suitably qualified MD offered a
diagnosis on a public forum. Do you have evidence?

Do you think that Phil's medical condition as diagnosed is
a cause for his actions?

Yes and a very nasty disposition mixed in for good measure.

Also, do you think it's a good idea to declare a medical
condition like this on the internet?

Yes. He has freely discussed other people's medical
conditions and even disclosed a person's criminal record.

What is the relevance of the same sex encounter you claim
Phil has had?

This explains his obsession with all things anal and his
homophobic tendencies.


Yes, you've obviously not understood. Indeed, your using the very
techniques you criticise to create your case.

I don't know Phil Allison as well as you - I only know what I've seen on
a NG (and even then it's not that reliable). However, I see his bad
language as an extreme vernacular. You obviously feel you've
witnessed/experienced something far more serious.

What relevance is Phil's occupation and employment status?

It shows he lacks creditability. It also demonstrates why
he detests anyone with qualifications. The more highly
qualified someone is the more Philthy is likely to have a go
at them.


I find it perfectly reasonable to accept that someone without
qualifications knows more than one with.

What relevance is Phil's tenure, age and religious
background?

It demonstrates why he has such a nasty disposion and why he
has so much time on his hands. Basically it says why he is
a grumpy old man ;-)


Do you not see why you're a bigot? A lot of people are. Just learn to
describe yourself as a bigot.

If your answers to any of these questions have anything to
do with your hatred of Phil, please explain.

My dislike of your pal is solely because how he treats
people and because of the disgusting things he has written
about me, my family and my friends. Yes, it's personal.


Phil isn't my 'pal'. I don't know him. Neither do you, from the lack of
evidence you've offered.

http://groups.google.com/group/aus.e...e=source&hl=en
here is where Philthy talks about his schooling and being
a Uni drop out. Feel free to do your own research
yourself *IF* you think I have in anyway mislead you or
anyone else.

That post says Phil left University for financial and
personal reasons. You persecute him for that ('university
dropout').

See above about qualifications, it goes a long way as to
explaining why he is the way he is.


How? What's this thing you've got with 'qualifications'?

You really are a prick TT.

Your opinion and you get to keep it. So what title do
bestow on pal Philthy then? Saint? Misunderstood boy
genius? What?


I don't have an opinion of Phil beyond his potty typing and short fuse,
he seems to know his onions, and he seems to attract vicious little
net-stalkers such as you.

I work in a university and I see this most days. It's
heartbreaking, and you think it's a bit of a laugh, or
something.

Oh quite the opposite actually. I think it is tragic waste
of a human life and an institutions rescoures.

I don't think there's a single word of that post I
disagree with. The thing with PhDs is that they train you
to *do* something - research in the main. They are so
focused they're not actually that useful in themselves.
And they're certainly not an even close measure of
intelligence (whatever that is, I don't know). How do you
know about PhDs by the way?

I haven't claimed any knowledge about PhDs. Except to say
that I am close to the universty scene as well ;-)

I dread to think. I think I may even know of you.

In my view you'd be better *not* having a go at people
unless you have a decent reason.

What about years of slander, libel and abuse and accusing me
of disgusting acts? Is that a valid reason in your opinion?


No, not really, I suspect you had it coming to you. Slander? When/what
was that? Do you know each other socially then? Actually, what
disgusting acts?

What I can't figure is what a person's age, sexuality,
tenure and so forth has to do with 'on topic'.


Ask CD why he started the thread then? He asked about
Philthy's family history and I *assumed* that would also
entail his background. I have stated the facts as I
undersatnd them. I also should mention many people seem to
agree with me ;-)

However, I am insinuating that you're a bigot by asking
you a series of focused questions. I don't think it's
stretching things too much to suggest that if i've reason
to believe that if you're a bigot in your personal life,
then you're a bigot in your private life.

No I am not a bigot, I just detest how Philthy interacts on
Usenet and how he has single handedly destroyed several
newsgroups.


You are a bigot TT. By definition.

Rob