Phil Allison
 

"Rob" wrote in message
om...
TT wrote:
snipped for readability purposes


How do you know Phil's medical condition?

It has been openly discussed on and off groups and MDs have offered their
opinion.


I'm afraid I simply don't believe that a suitably qualified MD offered a
diagnosis on a public forum. Do you have evidence?

Let Google be your friend since you doubt nearly everything I say.

Do you think that Phil's medical condition as diagnosed is a cause for
his actions?

Yes and a very nasty disposition mixed in for good measure.

Also, do you think it's a good idea to declare a medical condition like
this on the internet?

Yes. He has freely discussed other people's medical conditions and even
disclosed a person's criminal record.

What is the relevance of the same sex encounter you claim Phil has had?

This explains his obsession with all things anal and his homophobic
tendencies.


Yes, you've obviously not understood. Indeed, your using the very
techniques you criticise to create your case.

Yes, I am fighting fire with fire. All normal rules of netiquette are
suspended in Philthy's case.


I don't know Phil Allison as well as you - I only know what I've seen on a
NG (and even then it's not that reliable). However, I see his bad language
as an extreme vernacular. You obviously feel you've witnessed/experienced
something far more serious.

What relevance is Phil's occupation and employment status?

It shows he lacks creditability. It also demonstrates why he detests
anyone with qualifications. The more highly qualified someone is the
more Philthy is likely to have a go at them.


I find it perfectly reasonable to accept that someone without
qualifications knows more than one with.

Yet you start this post calling for the qulifications from MD's I discussed
Philthy with? And you accuse me of bigotry and double standards?

What relevance is Phil's tenure, age and religious background?

It demonstrates why he has such a nasty disposion and why he has so much
time on his hands. Basically it says why he is a grumpy old man ;-)


Do you not see why you're a bigot? A lot of people are. Just learn to
describe yourself as a bigot.

*IF* by your definition of bigot is to not dumbly stand by and let an
arsehole like Philthy do and say what he will then I must qualify.


If your answers to any of these questions have anything to do with your
hatred of Phil, please explain.

My dislike of your pal is solely because how he treats people and because
of the disgusting things he has written about me, my family and my
friends. Yes, it's personal.


Phil isn't my 'pal'. I don't know him. Neither do you, from the lack of
evidence you've offered.

http://groups.google.com/group/aus.e...e=source&hl=en
here is where Philthy talks about his schooling and being a Uni drop
out. Feel free to do your own research yourself *IF* you think I have
in anyway mislead you or anyone else.

That post says Phil left University for financial and personal reasons.
You persecute him for that ('university dropout').

See above about qualifications, it goes a long way as to explaining why
he is the way he is.


How? What's this thing you've got with 'qualifications'?

They are valuable in proving that someone is competant to perform a task of
give and oppinion on a subject of their expertise? Or do you just beklieve
everything someone tells you?

You really are a prick TT.

Your opinion and you get to keep it. So what title do bestow on pal
Philthy then? Saint? Misunderstood boy genius? What?


I don't have an opinion of Phil beyond his potty typing and short fuse, he
seems to know his onions, and he seems to attract vicious little
net-stalkers such as you.

I work in a university and I see this most days. It's heartbreaking, and
you think it's a bit of a laugh, or something.

Oh quite the opposite actually. I think it is tragic waste of a human
life and an institutions rescoures.

I don't think there's a single word of that post I disagree with. The
thing with PhDs is that they train you to *do* something - research in
the main. They are so focused they're not actually that useful in
themselves. And they're certainly not an even close measure of
intelligence (whatever that is, I don't know). How do you know about
PhDs by the way?

I haven't claimed any knowledge about PhDs. Except to say that I am
close to the universty scene as well ;-)

I dread to think. I think I may even know of you.

Ask your pal Philthy as he knows all about me and my family.

In my view you'd be better *not* having a go at people unless you have a
decent reason.

What about years of slander, libel and abuse and accusing me of
disgusting acts? Is that a valid reason in your opinion?


No, not really, I suspect you had it coming to you.

HA! I can only hope that Philthy does he his little act on you then.

Slander? When/what was that? Do you know each other socially then?
Actually, what disgusting acts?

Google can be your friend.


What I can't figure is what a person's age, sexuality, tenure and so
forth has to do with 'on topic'.


Ask CD why he started the thread then? He asked about Philthy's family
history and I *assumed* that would also entail his background. I have
stated the facts as I undersatnd them. I also should mention many people
seem to agree with me ;-)

However, I am insinuating that you're a bigot by asking you a series of
focused questions. I don't think it's stretching things too much to
suggest that if i've reason to believe that if you're a bigot in your
personal life, then you're a bigot in your private life.

No I am not a bigot, I just detest how Philthy interacts on Usenet and
how he has single handedly destroyed several newsgroups.


You are a bigot TT. By definition.

Rob

I don't intend to swap insults with you about this at all. The questions
were asked, I have given honest answers and you want to somehow prove me at
fault. I have stated my case and you prefer the abusive arsehole to me. So
be it.

I wont participate in this thread any more and as I have suggested *IF* you
genuinely interested then Google. Most of the occurrences are from
aus.hi-fi.

Search criteria is The poster's name "Phil Allison" Relevant words are "the
"c" word", the "F" word, autistic, criminal, liar. I won't mention other
poster's names as I'm sure they will become evident. He was especially
active about 3-5 years ago.

Cheers TT

Phil Allison
 

"David Looser" wrote in message
...
"TT" wrote in message
...

snipped for readability purposes


How do you know Phil's medical condition?

It has been openly discussed on and off groups

Oh well, that's *real* evidence! (not :-()

and MDs have offered their opinion.

Then they shouldn't have done, that is a clear breach of medical ethics.
In any case unless they have treated him themselves their opinion counts
for little.


My dislike of your pal

When did Rob ever describe Phil as his "pal"? It seems to be a habit of
yours to claim that other people are "defending" someone when all they are
doing is objecting to your way of making ill-informed judgements about
other people.

That's a joke right? I'm ill-informed about what an abusive little troll
Philthy is?


I kill-filed Phil a long time ago because,

I did to for a while but he would then start to prey on newbies. A quick
chat on what Philthy is and how to deal with him and the message soon got
through.

although he has much to contribute, I am not prepared to correspond with
anyone who's response to any post that contradicts his views is to launch
into a barrage of foul language. That's all I need to do, and if everyone
did that he would effectively cease to exist as far as Usenet is
concerned. Producing web-sites devoted to him, along with quack
"diagnosis" of his medical condition is IMHO utterly inappropriate.

David.

As I have attempted to explain to Rob, Philthy's whole persona is "utterly
inappropriate".

I have found exposing him for what he is and to show people how he behaves,
he quickly goes away again. Once people realise what a sad and pathetic
creature he really is he ceases to be a problem.

BTW I have had my say, I have answered Rob's questions and I shall now fade
away into the background again.

Cheers TT

Phil Allison
 

TT wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message
om...
TT wrote:
snipped for readability purposes


How do you know Phil's medical condition?
It has been openly discussed on and off groups and MDs have offered their
opinion.

I'm afraid I simply don't believe that a suitably qualified MD offered a
diagnosis on a public forum. Do you have evidence?

Let Google be your friend since you doubt nearly everything I say.

Do you think that Phil's medical condition as diagnosed is a cause for
his actions?
Yes and a very nasty disposition mixed in for good measure.

Also, do you think it's a good idea to declare a medical condition like
this on the internet?
Yes. He has freely discussed other people's medical conditions and even
disclosed a person's criminal record.

What is the relevance of the same sex encounter you claim Phil has had?
This explains his obsession with all things anal and his homophobic
tendencies.

Yes, you've obviously not understood. Indeed, your using the very
techniques you criticise to create your case.

Yes, I am fighting fire with fire. All normal rules of netiquette are
suspended in Philthy's case.

I don't know Phil Allison as well as you - I only know what I've seen on a
NG (and even then it's not that reliable). However, I see his bad language
as an extreme vernacular. You obviously feel you've witnessed/experienced
something far more serious.

What relevance is Phil's occupation and employment status?
It shows he lacks creditability. It also demonstrates why he detests
anyone with qualifications. The more highly qualified someone is the
more Philthy is likely to have a go at them.

I find it perfectly reasonable to accept that someone without
qualifications knows more than one with.

Yet you start this post calling for the qulifications from MD's I discussed
Philthy with? And you accuse me of bigotry and double standards?

What relevance is Phil's tenure, age and religious background?
It demonstrates why he has such a nasty disposion and why he has so much
time on his hands. Basically it says why he is a grumpy old man ;-)

Do you not see why you're a bigot? A lot of people are. Just learn to
describe yourself as a bigot.

*IF* by your definition of bigot is to not dumbly stand by and let an
arsehole like Philthy do and say what he will then I must qualify.

If your answers to any of these questions have anything to do with your
hatred of Phil, please explain.
My dislike of your pal is solely because how he treats people and because
of the disgusting things he has written about me, my family and my
friends. Yes, it's personal.

Phil isn't my 'pal'. I don't know him. Neither do you, from the lack of
evidence you've offered.

http://groups.google.com/group/aus.e...e=source&hl=en
here is where Philthy talks about his schooling and being a Uni drop
out. Feel free to do your own research yourself *IF* you think I have
in anyway mislead you or anyone else.

That post says Phil left University for financial and personal reasons.
You persecute him for that ('university dropout').
See above about qualifications, it goes a long way as to explaining why
he is the way he is.

How? What's this thing you've got with 'qualifications'?

They are valuable in proving that someone is competant to perform a task of
give and oppinion on a subject of their expertise? Or do you just beklieve
everything someone tells you?

You really are a prick TT.
Your opinion and you get to keep it. So what title do bestow on pal
Philthy then? Saint? Misunderstood boy genius? What?

I don't have an opinion of Phil beyond his potty typing and short fuse, he
seems to know his onions, and he seems to attract vicious little
net-stalkers such as you.

I work in a university and I see this most days. It's heartbreaking, and
you think it's a bit of a laugh, or something.

Oh quite the opposite actually. I think it is tragic waste of a human
life and an institutions rescoures.

I don't think there's a single word of that post I disagree with. The
thing with PhDs is that they train you to *do* something - research in
the main. They are so focused they're not actually that useful in
themselves. And they're certainly not an even close measure of
intelligence (whatever that is, I don't know). How do you know about
PhDs by the way?
I haven't claimed any knowledge about PhDs. Except to say that I am
close to the universty scene as well ;-)
I dread to think. I think I may even know of you.

Ask your pal Philthy as he knows all about me and my family.

In my view you'd be better *not* having a go at people unless you have a
decent reason.
What about years of slander, libel and abuse and accusing me of
disgusting acts? Is that a valid reason in your opinion?

No, not really, I suspect you had it coming to you.

HA! I can only hope that Philthy does he his little act on you then.

Slander? When/what was that? Do you know each other socially then?
Actually, what disgusting acts?

Google can be your friend.

What I can't figure is what a person's age, sexuality, tenure and so
forth has to do with 'on topic'.

Ask CD why he started the thread then? He asked about Philthy's family
history and I *assumed* that would also entail his background. I have
stated the facts as I undersatnd them. I also should mention many people
seem to agree with me ;-)

However, I am insinuating that you're a bigot by asking you a series of
focused questions. I don't think it's stretching things too much to
suggest that if i've reason to believe that if you're a bigot in your
personal life, then you're a bigot in your private life.

No I am not a bigot, I just detest how Philthy interacts on Usenet and
how he has single handedly destroyed several newsgroups.

You are a bigot TT. By definition.

Rob

I don't intend to swap insults with you about this at all. The questions
were asked, I have given honest answers and you want to somehow prove me at
fault. I have stated my case and you prefer the abusive arsehole to me. So
be it.

I wont participate in this thread any more and as I have suggested *IF* you
genuinely interested then Google. Most of the occurrences are from
aus.hi-fi.

Search criteria is The poster's name "Phil Allison" Relevant words are "the
"c" word", the "F" word, autistic, criminal, liar. I won't mention other
poster's names as I'm sure they will become evident. He was especially
active about 3-5 years ago.

Cheers TT


I'd just written analysis of your post - this'll do:

Frankly, having just read a heap of your posts on Phil Allison, I'm
quite happy to leave this now. I'm out of my league.

Rob

Phil Allison
 

On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:36:06 GMT, Rob
wrote:

cd wrote:
[arguments snipped]
Well Phil must be very pleased that you are fighting over him.
I wish I hadn't started this - please leave it now.

Why did you start it cd?


I didn't start your argument.
I asked Phil a couple of questions. If I had known you and TT were
going to throw hissy fits at each other I would not have posted them.