![]() |
Dynamic mic questions
In article ,
TonyL wrote: For recording, strictly for fun with a few friends ATM. We are not intending any public performances. Recommendations ? Personally I'd favour a good quality secondhand condenser mic - probably ex broadcast, etc. Something like a Neumann KM 84, AKG C451, Calrec CM101. But they might be hard to find. But there are plenty of cheap new Chinese condensers which will sound far better than an SM58 for this - and cost about the same. Sadly I'm not well up on those so perhaps someone else could give a recommendation. -- *Ham and Eggs: Just a day's work for a chicken, but a lifetime commitment Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Dynamic mic questions
"Dave Plowman (Nutcase) " I've ordered a SM 58, will be interesting to compare. The SM 58 is one of the most over-rated mics ever. ** On the contrary - the Shure SM58's good reputation for live vocal work is well justified. Since the late 1960s, it has LITERALLY set the standard for ALL vocal mics in both appearance and sound quality to follow. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shure_SM58 Its only virtues are robustness and reasonable noise cancellation. ** You are allowed to have that opinion - but it is the view of a ****ing idiot. Certainly not sound quality. ** That so many folk PREFER the results given by the SM58 and many other mics that are essentialy clones of it, proves there is nothing wrong with the design. Cerainly, there are some Shure mic haters out there - just like there are rabid racists, religious bigots and all kinds of ratbags and mental defectives who try to foist their mad opionion on others. Dave Plowman is a first class example of the above. ...... Phil |
Dynamic mic questions
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Personally I'd favour a good quality secondhand condenser mic - probably ex broadcast, etc. Something like a Neumann KM 84, AKG C451, Calrec CM101. But they might be hard to find. But there are plenty of cheap new Chinese condensers which will sound far better than an SM58 for this - and cost about the same. Sadly I'm not well up on those so perhaps someone else could give a recommendation. K, thanks. |
Dynamic mic questions
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:42:51 +0100, "TonyL"
wrote: Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Personally I'd favour a good quality secondhand condenser mic - probably ex broadcast, etc. Something like a Neumann KM 84, AKG C451, Calrec CM101. But they might be hard to find. But there are plenty of cheap new Chinese condensers which will sound far better than an SM58 for this - and cost about the same. Sadly I'm not well up on those so perhaps someone else could give a recommendation. K, thanks. If you are recording, you definitely do not want a mic designed for vocals - they all have a peculiar frequency response. Can you give us a clue as to budget? That'll make a short list a whole heap easier. d |
Dynamic mic questions
In article ,
Phil Allison wrote: The SM 58 is one of the most over-rated mics ever. ** On the contrary - the Shure SM58's good reputation for live vocal work is well justified. Since the late 1960s, it has LITERALLY set the standard for ALL vocal mics in both appearance and sound quality to follow. It set a fashion with those who knew no better - purely because it was quite good as a 'live' vocal mic feeding a PA etc system. Seeing it on TV etc gave the idea to amateurs that it was therefore a good general purpose mic - which it's not. FFS - I've even seen it being used for interviews in a quiet location. So it's not just amateurs that get fooled so easily. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shure_SM58 Its only virtues are robustness and reasonable noise cancellation. ** You are allowed to have that opinion - but it is the view of a ****ing idiot. All you're proving is you've never tried comparing it to a decent mic. The only time you'll see it used in a recording studio is for possibly a snare drum where the weird frequency response and high SPL handling can enhance that sound. And the OP wants a mic for *recording* vocals and acoustic guitar. Certainly not sound quality. ** That so many folk PREFER the results given by the SM58 and many other mics that are essentialy clones of it, proves there is nothing wrong with the design. Weird people prefer all sorts of sounds - as you've proved. But as a general purpose recording mic I can barely think of a worse one. Cerainly, there are some Shure mic haters out there - just like there are rabid racists, religious bigots and all kinds of ratbags and mental defectives who try to foist their mad opionion on others. Dave Plowman is a first class example of the above. What microphones do you own or have experience of? Have you *ever* been in a recording studio etc and observed what is used where? -- *Learn from your parents' mistakes - use birth control. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Dave Plowman = Nutcase
"Dave Plowman ( Nutcase ) " I've ordered a SM 58, will be interesting to compare. The SM 58 is one of the most over-rated mics ever. ** On the contrary - the Shure SM58's good reputation for live vocal work is well justified. Since the late 1960s, it has LITERALLY set the standard for ALL vocal mics in both appearance and sound quality to follow. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shure_SM58 Its only virtues are robustness and reasonable noise cancellation. ** You are allowed to have that opinion - but it is the view of a ****ing idiot. Certainly not sound quality. ** That so many folk PREFER the results given by the SM58 and many other mics that are essentialy clones of it, proves there is nothing wrong with the design. Cerainly, there are some Shure mic haters out there - just like there are rabid racists, religious bigots and all kinds of ratbags and mental defectives who try to foist their mad opionions on others. Dave Plowman is a first class example of the above. His kind of congenital autism disorder is rampat in the UK That is what the whole country is totally and permaneantly ****ed and every one of its residents hated world wide. ...... Phil |
Dynamic mic questions
Don Pearce wrote:
If you are recording, you definitely do not want a mic designed for vocals - they all have a peculiar frequency response. Can you give us a clue as to budget? That'll make a short list a whole heap easier. Definitely sub £100. |
Dave Plowman = Nutcase
In article ,
Phil Allison wrote: The SM 58 is one of the most over-rated mics ever. ** On the contrary - the Shure SM58's good reputation for live vocal work is well justified. Since the late 1960s, it has LITERALLY set the standard for ALL vocal mics in both appearance and sound quality to follow. You're a prat. You'll never see one used for vocals in a recording studio. Live sound has different priorities - actual quality often coming well down the list. So add that to all the other things you don't know. -- *If you must choose between two evils, pick the one you've never tried before Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Dynamic mic questions
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:39:43 +0100, "TonyL"
wrote: Don Pearce wrote: If you are recording, you definitely do not want a mic designed for vocals - they all have a peculiar frequency response. Can you give us a clue as to budget? That'll make a short list a whole heap easier. Definitely sub £100. OK. Behringer is a good manufacturer for everything. I would go for a pair of C-1 mics. They are decent cardioids, and Dolphin Music are doing them at £28.95. They are condensors, so they need phantom power. If you don't have that available, get yourself a small mixer. The Behringer UB802 with four mic inputs will set you back about £45. That is the basis of some really very high quality recording capability for £100. That do? d |
Dave Plowman = Nutcase
"Dave Plowman ( Nutcase ) "
I've ordered a SM 58, will be interesting to compare. The SM 58 is one of the most over-rated mics ever. ** On the contrary - the Shure SM58's good reputation for live vocal work is well justified. Since the late 1960s, it has LITERALLY set the standard for ALL vocal mics in both appearance and sound quality to follow. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shure_SM58 Its only virtues are robustness and reasonable noise cancellation. ** You are allowed to have that opinion - but it is the view of a 100% ****ing idiot. Certainly not sound quality. ** That so many folk PREFER the results given by the SM58 and many other mics that are essentially clones of it, proves there is nothing wrong with the design. Certainly, there are some Shure mic haters out there - just like there are rabid racists, religious bigots and all kinds of ratbags and mental defectives who try to foist their mad opinions on others. Dave Plowman is a first class example of the above. His kind of congenital autism disorder is rampant in the UK That is what the whole country is totally and permanently ****ed and every one of its residents hated world wide. ...... Phil |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk