On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:35:53 +0000, Laurence Payne wrote:

And I'm going to ask just what you mean by "multi-tracking". What
program is the computer running? Are the individual tracks being
recorded simultaneously? If so, let's get off the subject of USB
microphones.

No I mean they record one track after another. Note sure what s/w they're
using - I think one of the lads has one of those evil[1] things with a
half-consumed fruit as a logo :-)

[1] http://objectiveministries.org/creat...nda.html#APPLE

--
John Stumbles

On 5 Dec 2009 11:56:37 GMT, John Stumbles
wrote:

On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:35:53 +0000, Laurence Payne wrote:

And I'm going to ask just what you mean by "multi-tracking". What
program is the computer running? Are the individual tracks being
recorded simultaneously? If so, let's get off the subject of USB
microphones.

No I mean they record one track after another. Note sure what s/w they're
using - I think one of the lads has one of those evil[1] things with a
half-consumed fruit as a logo :-)

[1] http://objectiveministries.org/creat...nda.html#APPLE

OK, by far the easiest and most intuitive way of doing this is normal
mics into a normal mixer. That can plug into a normal sound card on
any computer - even one of those evil empire fruit jobs. It also has
the advantage of maximum flexibility, and you can use everything for
other purposes too. The mixer can even be used for performances if
they (ok, you) decide to buy a high power PA and speakers. So it is a
question of whether you want to go along a route which is essentially
a dead end with USB or keep all your options open with a more
conventional method.

d

Google Shure SM58 USB. Shure sm58 with usb adapter, use with computer
and live.

On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:36:26 -0500, mkm wrote:

Google Shure SM58 USB. Shure sm58 with usb adapter, use with computer
and live.

The 58 is already a little beyond Santa's budget.

d

"John Stumbles" wrote

No I mean they record one track after another. Note sure what s/w they're
using - I think one of the lads has one of those evil[1] things with a
half-consumed fruit as a logo :-)

[1] http://objectiveministries.org/creat...nda.html#APPLE


Thanks for the link. :-)

I just fell about reading it. It was hard to decide whether this website was
for real, or was a spoof.

I particularly liked this quote:-

"That's right, new Macs are based on Darwinism! While they currently don't
advertise this fact to consumers, it is well known among the computer elite,
who are mostly Atheists and Pagans. Furthermore, the Darwin OS is released
under an "Open Source" license, which is just another name for Communism."


David.

On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:48:15 +0000, David Looser wrote:

"John Stumbles" wrote

No I mean they record one track after another. Note sure what s/w
they're using - I think one of the lads has one of those evil[1] things
with a half-consumed fruit as a logo :-)

[1] http://objectiveministries.org/creat...nda.html#APPLE


Thanks for the link. :-)

I just fell about reading it. It was hard to decide whether this website
was for real, or was a spoof.

If it is it's admirably tongue-in-cheek :-)

Also check out
http://objectiveministries.org/creation/pterosaurs.html
I particularly love the picture of Adam and Eve with genitalia 'artfully'
obscured by pterosaur; the "remains of wicked pterodactyl found in Flood
sediments. Note penitent stance preserved at moment of death" and Moses'
"pterosaur-scaring device"!


--
John Stumbles

On 5 Dec 2009 20:50:05 GMT, John Stumbles
wrote:

Also check out
http://objectiveministries.org/creation/pterosaurs.html
I particularly love the picture of Adam and Eve with genitalia 'artfully'
obscured by pterosaur; the "remains of wicked pterodactyl found in Flood
sediments. Note penitent stance preserved at moment of death" and Moses'
"pterosaur-scaring device"!

You can ALMOST see her minge through the pterosaur's semi-transparent
wing.

The pterosaur has a wicked gleam in its eye. The lump in its throat is
obviously Adam's genitals, which it has just devoured, despite his
attempt to divert attention to a bunch of grapes. It is endowed with
a remarkably large dick - tapered, no doubt, for aerodynamic reasons.
It is not erect, so we may deduce he isn't a gay pterosaur. It would
be interesting to compare a picture with him facing Eve.

"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
...
On 5 Dec 2009 20:50:05 GMT, John Stumbles
wrote:

Also check out
http://objectiveministries.org/creation/pterosaurs.html
I particularly love the picture of Adam and Eve with genitalia 'artfully'
obscured by pterosaur; the "remains of wicked pterodactyl found in Flood
sediments. Note penitent stance preserved at moment of death" and Moses'
"pterosaur-scaring device"!

You can ALMOST see her minge through the pterosaur's semi-transparent
wing.

The pterosaur has a wicked gleam in its eye. The lump in its throat is
obviously Adam's genitals, which it has just devoured, despite his
attempt to divert attention to a bunch of grapes. It is endowed with
a remarkably large dick - tapered, no doubt, for aerodynamic reasons.
It is not erect, so we may deduce he isn't a gay pterosaur. It would
be interesting to compare a picture with him facing Eve.

And isn't it nice to know that Adam and Eve were white, had Caucasian
features and modern hairstyles. They are curiously untanned despite lacking
both clothing and, presumably, sun-block!

David.

On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:38:55 +0000, Laurence Payne wrote:


... so we may deduce he isn't a gay pterosaur. It would be
interesting to compare a picture with him facing Eve.

"I say, does anyone know what became of Carutthers?"

"Last I heard of him he was out in Borneo living with an Oran-Utang."

"Male or female Orang-Utang?"

"Female, of course. Nothing 'odd' about Carutthers."


--
John Stumbles

On 6 Dec 2009 23:43:53 GMT, John Stumbles
wrote:

... so we may deduce he isn't a gay pterosaur. It would be
interesting to compare a picture with him facing Eve.

"I say, does anyone know what became of Carutthers?"

"Last I heard of him he was out in Borneo living with an Oran-Utang."

"Male or female Orang-Utang?"

"Female, of course. Nothing 'odd' about Carutthers."


"...and he took to pig-sticking in QUITE the wrong way...."