Anything positive to say about BBC HD quality.
On 08/01/2010 13:14, Arny Krueger wrote:
"bcoombes"bcoombes@orangedotnet wrote in message
Rob wrote:
On 08/01/2010 12:40, Arny Krueger wrote:
wrote in message
m
On 08/01/2010 08:56, David Looser wrote:
wrote
Absolutely, well put - so what I'm talking about is a
coincidental, and not causal, artefact. No idea what
it is, why it should be there or what makes it
'real'.
So you like distortion, OK if that's your preference
so be it. Just makes the music sound better.
To you maybe, to me the distortions generated by vinyl
recording makes the music sound worse.
Well, you'd say distortions, I'd say characteristics.
All distortions are characteristics, but not all
characteristics are distortions.
Seems like a failure to communicate.
Just trying to shift the notion of pejorative to one
side of your mind, for one moment.
It might be just the distortions/associated
harmonics, don't know.
Speaks to your ability to deny scientific facts.
I'm the last person you should ask for confirmation on
science or fact :-)
All I do know is that, so far as I can tell, the
music quality doesn't necessarily improve when said
distortions are taken away.
The trick would be to take just the distortions away.
So: master tape explanations aside, I don't know why
LPs sound better in some circumstances.
If a LP sounds better than the CD then the people who
made the CD screwed up. Pure and simple.
. . . is one explanation.
Yeah, that'll be the one Arny wants to see because it
*fits* his rather fragile and prejudiced views.
"Fragile and prejudiced"?
LOL!
Observing that the LP format has more inherent audible noise and distortion
than the CD format makes me prejudice?
LOL!
You really do live in a universe of your own, I guess. You know, I bet that
in your universe, you're the smartest, wittiest, most charming person
around. Ever hear of a guy named "Walter Mitty"?
Very sad.
Uh oh, he's foaming at the mouth now....
:-(
|
Threaded Mode
