In article ,
Brian Gaff wrote:
hing is if this is what trashed it the first time, requiring a reflash
of the software, then on the one hand I don't want to let it do that
again, on the other, if the problem is not happening its hard to prove
the ferrite ring is fixing it.

Not an expensive thing to try and can do no harm. If it doesn't crash
again it's fixed. ;-)

--
*If at first you don't succeed, try management *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:50:04 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

In article ,
Brian Gaff wrote:
hing is if this is what trashed it the first time, requiring a reflash
of the software, then on the one hand I don't want to let it do that
again, on the other, if the problem is not happening its hard to prove
the ferrite ring is fixing it.

Not an expensive thing to try and can do no harm. If it doesn't crash
again it's fixed. ;-)

No, if it doesn't crash again, it hasn't crashed again yet. :-(

d

Yes, difficult.
I've got three months, and have already emailed the company telling them I
had some problems so I'll see what they suggest.


Maybe a nice set of rechargeable batteries on a very short lead!

Brian

--
Brian Gaff -
Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name may be lost.
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:50:04 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

In article ,
Brian Gaff wrote:
hing is if this is what trashed it the first time, requiring a reflash
of the software, then on the one hand I don't want to let it do that
again, on the other, if the problem is not happening its hard to prove
the ferrite ring is fixing it.

Not an expensive thing to try and can do no harm. If it doesn't crash
again it's fixed. ;-)

No, if it doesn't crash again, it hasn't crashed again yet. :-(

d