| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... |
Echo - was: Same old faces, same old faeces.....
In article ,
Keith G wrote: New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... Don't know whether this is an entirely new topic as I've only been lurking for a few weeks but since getting some half decent headphones, I've started noticing annoying echoes in various pieces (no, not like that time I inadvertently had the echo effect on in Audacious when I listened to the Prelude to Act III of Lohengrin - you should try it ;-) such as ( a good example) http://www.raaga.com/player4/?id=776...10868666248922 which has a faint annoying echo in the right headphone. I assume this is an actual echo from some surface in the recording studio. At first I thought it might be a headphone problem but I could just discern the echo in my old cheapo computer headphones, though not on my cheap computer speakers. Anyway, I'd be interested to read what all you erudite audiophiles have to say about it - and please don't tell me it is my headphones after all! -- Om Namah Shivaya | Om Saha-srapadave namaha David - toro-danyo atcost uku fullstop co fullstop uk http://www.toro-danyo.uku.co.uk/ |
Echo - was: Same old faces, same old faeces.....
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:47:05 +0100, David
wrote: In article , Keith G wrote: New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... Don't know whether this is an entirely new topic as I've only been lurking for a few weeks but since getting some half decent headphones, I've started noticing annoying echoes in various pieces (no, not like that time I inadvertently had the echo effect on in Audacious when I listened to the Prelude to Act III of Lohengrin - you should try it ;-) such as ( a good example) http://www.raaga.com/player4/?id=776...10868666248922 which has a faint annoying echo in the right headphone. I assume this is an actual echo from some surface in the recording studio. At first I thought it might be a headphone problem but I could just discern the echo in my old cheapo computer headphones, though not on my cheap computer speakers. Anyway, I'd be interested to read what all you erudite audiophiles have to say about it - and please don't tell me it is my headphones after all! It is there. It was put there during the recording. You are listening to a product of the Indian recording industry which has the same approach to quality as Bollywood does in its film production. Basically, you are listening to a piece of crap. d |
Echo - was: Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"David" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... Don't know whether this is an entirely new topic as I've only been lurking for a few weeks Nice to hear from you but there are a lot of Davids here - you need an 'identifier'! Anyway, I'd be interested to read what all you erudite audiophiles have to say about it - and please don't tell me it is my headphones after all! No, like Don says, it's ironed in the track unless my cheap (but good) Sennheiser HD202s have suddenly gone West also! You either live with it (the singer is very good) or you get another version without the interference - preferably without that guy banging that sodding bell, he wears out his welcome a bit quick! |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
In article ,
Keith G wrote: New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... Yup. Just after your return here you posted:- 'To me, 'high definition' audio is a good record played with a good needle on good kit (preferably vinyl, triodes and Lowthers)' Exactly the same narrow view you've been posting here for years. It could well have been written 50 years ago. -- *People want trepanners like they want a hole in the head* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... Yup. Just after your return here you posted:- 'To me, 'high definition' audio is a good record played with a good needle on good kit (preferably vinyl, triodes and Lowthers)' Exactly the same narrow view you've been posting here for years. Narrow view? You object to my (highly consistent, it would appear) expressed preference? :-) Prompts this for a bit of fun - how narrow is this list of audiovisual kit in regular use here, starting from the 'left': Optoma PJ Acer Revo computer Samsung BDP Technics FM tuner Denon SS amplifier Grundig USB PVR Sanyo telly Technics DD turntable Homebrew Fidelio speakers Homebrew Buschhorn Mk II speakers Yamaha sub Lenco turntable Homebrew SET amp WAD kit phono stage WAD Kit88 PP amplifier Technics DD turntable (again) Homebrew Cyburg's Needles speakers Acer L100 computer Acoustic Solutions DAB tuner (playing right now) Denon SS amp Acer Revo computer Homebuilt X-QPack computer Assorted USB hard disks Ruark speakers Tannoy speakers Tannoy centre speaker Sony telly Topfield PVR Strange little PVR with no name (hangs from the scart socket) Optoma PJ (again) Western Digital TV media player Sony BDP Sony AV amplifier Samsung netbook Eh? well have been written 50 years ago. What is better now than it was 50 years ago? (Dunno about you, but when I see a 'new and improved' label, I usually run the other way..!! ;-) |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
Same old moaner and same old trolls, same old life forms, same old Earth,
same old Sun... Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "Keith G" wrote in message ... New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
On 23/07/2010 10:20, Keith G wrote:
Prompts this for a bit of fun - how narrow is this list of audiovisual kit in regular use here, starting from the 'left': Optoma PJ Acer Revo computer Samsung BDP Technics FM tuner Denon SS amplifier Grundig USB PVR Sanyo telly Technics DD turntable Homebrew Fidelio speakers Homebrew Buschhorn Mk II speakers Yamaha sub Lenco turntable Homebrew SET amp WAD kit phono stage WAD Kit88 PP amplifier Technics DD turntable (again) Homebrew Cyburg's Needles speakers Acer L100 computer Acoustic Solutions DAB tuner (playing right now) Denon SS amp Acer Revo computer Homebuilt X-QPack computer Assorted USB hard disks Ruark speakers Tannoy speakers Tannoy centre speaker Sony telly Topfield PVR Strange little PVR with no name (hangs from the scart socket) Optoma PJ (again) Western Digital TV media player Sony BDP Sony AV amplifier Samsung netbook Eh? plume de ma tante, matey!! have you considered taking a Saturday morning pitch down at Peckham Market? ;-) -- "No, no not goodbye Margaret, no just Bonjour" |
Echo - was: Same old faces, same old faeces.....
In article , Keith G
wrote: "David" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... Don't know whether this is an entirely new topic as I've only been lurking for a few weeks Nice to hear from you but there are a lot of Davids here - you need an 'identifier'! Davids are generic, aren't they? Anyway, I'd be interested to read what all you erudite audiophiles have to say about it - and please don't tell me it is my headphones after all! No, like Don says, it's ironed in the track unless my cheap (but good) Sennheiser HD202s have suddenly gone West also! You either live with it (the singer is very good) or you get another version without the interference - preferably without that guy banging that sodding bell, he wears out his welcome a bit quick! :-) I had hoped to read some erudite words on the difficulties of getting rid of such things as echoes in recordings. I did wonder if in fact it was the sound of the bell reverberating to the voice. I do know that certain sounds emanating from my radio speakers will cause reverberation of some items in the living room. -- Om Namah Shivaya | Om Satvikaya namaha David - toro-danyo atcost uku fullstop co fullstop uk http://www.toro-danyo.uku.co.uk/ |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Just Another Lurker" wrote in message ... On 23/07/2010 10:20, Keith G wrote: Prompts this for a bit of fun - how narrow is this list of audiovisual kit in regular use here, starting from the 'left': snip list Eh? plume de ma tante, matey!! have you considered taking a Saturday morning pitch down at Peckham Market? ;-) Not yet, but that's only a fraction of the kit that's been through here in the last 10 years or more! There isn't much I haven't explored except the 'boutique', 'high end' and overpriced Brit 'famous names' - my opinions and preferences are based on what I've learned from a ****load of 'hands on' comparisons and not a lot of theory, booklearning or browsing and certainly not on 'being told'! ;-) |
Echo - was: Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"David" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: "David" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... Don't know whether this is an entirely new topic as I've only been lurking for a few weeks Nice to hear from you but there are a lot of Davids here - you need an 'identifier'! Davids are generic, aren't they? Call me Dave, eh? :-) snip I had hoped to read some erudite words on the difficulties of getting rid of such things as echoes in recordings. I did wonder if in fact it was the sound of the bell reverberating to the voice. I do know that certain sounds emanating from my radio speakers will cause reverberation of some items in the living room. I'm sure if that track's gettable someoneone here would be able to faff it out in some way; I'd just move on, fit were me... |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Keith G" wrote in message
New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... With you Keith, its all about attitude. Yours. Crappy. Me-centric. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Keith G" wrote in message ... Narrow view? You object to my (highly consistent, it would appear) expressed preference? :-) Prompts this for a bit of fun - how narrow is this list of audiovisual kit in regular use here, starting from the 'left': Acer Revo computer Acer L100 computer Acer Revo computer Homebuilt X-QPack computer Samsung netbook Listing your computers is meaningless, you didn't know about YT and updating Adobe Flash player, so no doubt you know nothing about updating other areas of your pc's and laptops. Burners both DVD and BD both need frequent updating with latest firmware so as to iron out bugs etc, but importantly to increase compatibility with the increasing range of blank media, same with standalone burners. Ever noted that some blank discs work fine with your burners but others not, all thats needed is a firmware update, you didn't know that did you? You don't list the specification, I doubt there is anything impressive or uptodate on any of your computers, but if they work for you thats what counts. Samsung BDP Sony BDP The mighty Sony is not so mighty these days, though they will never vanish. But you seem to have identical BD players from the TSST.corp production line just each badged differently... Why? And I suspect it's an odd's on certainty you never went to the TSST site, clicked the support link, downloaded the accumulative firmware update for each model, burned said firmware to CD following the support instructions to use the R/C to access hidden service menu and update said firmware, did you? Sanyo telly Sony telly No details of your TV's, though I have a painful feeling you have your identical BD players connected via scart to a couple of CRT's.. Acoustic Solutions DAB tuner (playing right now) Sigh, DAB on an Argos sourced Accoustic solutions..... I do apoligise in advance Keef, I'm not out to drive you into therapy, but just a few questions for when you're not feeling stressed... Do you really think anyone will be impressed with that list of motley models that you fail to identify? Why haven't you listed your croissant racks? Why are you known as "Kitty"? (Anyone else who wants to leave messages on the YT site at least identify who you post as in this group) Now Keef, have a nice cup of tea and relax. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... With you Keith, its all about attitude. Yours. Crappy. Me-centric. My attitude is crappy and me-centric???? Tell me , Arny - do you ever read your own posts, starting with the one above? You are describing yourself perfectly! |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Fed Up Lurker" wrote quite a lot of guessology I do apoligise in advance Keef, I'm not out to drive you into therapy, but just a few questions for when you're not feeling stressed... Sure, I'm still converting TV recordings I got a little keyboard time left. Do you really think anyone will be impressed with that list of motley models that you fail to identify? Who TF cares either way? Why haven't you listed your croissant racks? Why are you known as "Kitty"? I like to dress in women's clothes of an evening... (Anyone else who wants to leave messages on the YT site at least identify who you post as in this group) Good coming from an Anony Mouse like you, ain't it? Now Keef, have a nice cup of tea and relax. There you go again - pure magic! :-) Mmmmm...... |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Keith G" wrote Prompts this for a bit of fun - how narrow is this list of audiovisual kit in regular use here, starting from the 'left': Optoma PJ Acer Revo computer Samsung BDP Technics FM tuner Denon SS amplifier Grundig USB PVR Sanyo telly Technics DD turntable Homebrew Fidelio speakers Homebrew Buschhorn Mk II speakers Yamaha sub Lenco turntable Homebrew SET amp WAD kit phono stage WAD Kit88 PP amplifier Technics DD turntable (again) Homebrew Cyburg's Needles speakers Acer L100 computer Acoustic Solutions DAB tuner (playing right now) Denon SS amp Acer Revo computer Homebuilt X-QPack computer Assorted USB hard disks Ruark speakers Tannoy speakers Tannoy centre speaker Sony telly Topfield PVR Strange little PVR with no name (hangs from the scart socket) Optoma PJ (again) Western Digital TV media player Sony BDP Sony AV amplifier Samsung netbook Plus a pair of B&W speakers I've just noticed!! As Fed Up Lurker (wot a sad name) has mentioned, there are no model details - so if anyone wants details and maybe a pic of any of the above, just let me know. Computer updates seem to worry him also - they are ongoing, all the time, automatic. Software updates - ongoing where it matters. Drives all working perfectly well except the drive in the Acer L100 which has disappeared - all covered by a Liteon flip-top USB DVD drive anyway. Please feel free to ask any questions, but only about MY kit - surprisingly, I can't speak for anyone else's here!! Dashed odd that, ain't it? ;-) |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Keith G" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... With you Keith, its all about attitude. Yours. Crappy. Me-centric. My attitude is crappy and me-centric???? So much so that if you were smart or charming, your posts could be a real treat. Eccentric is OK. Ego-centric and willfully ignorant gets boring. Tell me , Arny - do you ever read your own posts, starting with the one above? You are describing yourself perfectly! Lame IKWYABWAI noted. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... With you Keith, its all about attitude. Yours. Crappy. Me-centric. My attitude is crappy and me-centric???? So much so that if you were smart or charming, your posts could be a real treat. Eccentric is OK. Ego-centric and willfully ignorant gets boring. Tell me , Arny - do you ever read your own posts, starting with the one above? You are describing yourself perfectly! Lame IKWYABWAI noted. WTF is that when it's at home? Anyway, here's news: You don't earn smart and charming posts by forming an 'ad-hom' Attack Pack or carping like in the above post. It's really not too hard, Arny: you got two choices - you either read my posts (while you can) or you don't. What you don't have is the right to veto them. And, believe it or not, I really do find it tough to post about anything here on somebody else's behalf, so you will have to learn to live my so-called 'me-centricty' or do the other thing. My posting here doesn't stop anyone else posting whatever they like and, it goes without saying, anyone is perfectly at liberty to ignore my posts if they don't like them or even ****terise me. I couldn't care less either way. Now, comms are still open, got an original thought we'd be interested to hear - on topic, if you prefer? |
Echo - was: Same old faces, same old faeces.....
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:36:04 +0100, David
wrote: I had hoped to read some erudite words on the difficulties of getting rid of such things as echoes in recordings. I did wonder if in fact it was the sound of the bell reverberating to the voice. I do know that certain sounds emanating from my radio speakers will cause reverberation of some items in the living room. No, just poor effects, applied with a sledge hammer. You need to look to some other source and genre if you want anything like quality. d |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... With you Keith, its all about attitude. Yours. Crappy. Me-centric. My attitude is crappy and me-centric???? So much so that if you were smart or charming, your posts could be a real treat. Eccentric is OK. Ego-centric and willfully ignorant gets boring. Thank you for that little run-down, I can see more clearly now.... I've explained about 'ego-centric' and if you can't grasp the impossibility of me posting about and on behalf of others I can't help you - the wilfully ignorant bit is the one that makes me smile. Who TF are you (or anyone else here) to decide what knowledge I (or anybody else here) will address/heed and take on board? There's a small few here (3.5, actually) who deem this newsgroup a form of 'captive clinic' which exists for the purpose of them airing their knowledge and for 'putting people right' whether or not they want it or not. News for them.... (Have you no idea that this is the single biggest reason people leave the group?) FYI, I am not the recalcitrant teenager (by some 50 years) that refuses *to be told* that one or two here seem to think and I am quite capable of deciding with what I will bother my remaining brain cellls and what I will not. I am the first (and almost only) one to ask when/if I need to know as well as being the first to respond to any enquiry I can help with as my kind of payback. What little pratting about with 'audio' I still do is only a fraction of my hobbyist activities and my knowledge intake (via recorded TV programmes) progresses on a daily basis. (Struggling to see how I could improve my performance as a human being, let alone as an active poster here....??) Comms still open (and still waiting for an original thought) but not for much longer if all you are going to post is your never-ending condemnation of me and my posts..?? Like, who TF needs it? Actually Arny, I think we are fast approaching the 'say the word' stage again.... ?? ;-) |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Keith G" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... With you Keith, its all about attitude. Yours. Crappy. Me-centric. My attitude is crappy and me-centric???? So much so that if you were smart or charming, your posts could be a real treat. Eccentric is OK. Ego-centric and willfully ignorant gets boring. Tell me , Arny - do you ever read your own posts, starting with the one above? You are describing yourself perfectly! Lame IKWYABWAI noted. WTF is that when it's at home? Like many things Keith, something that many can recognize but is over *your* head. Anyway, here's news: You don't earn smart and charming posts by forming an 'ad-hom' Attack Pack or carping like in the above post. Here's a news flash for you Keith. Interesting posts are made not earned. It's really not too hard, Arny: Obviously, beyond your limited means, Keith. you got two choices - you either read my posts An opportunity I take all the time. What you don't have is the right to veto them. Right but I do have the right to comment on them. Now Keither, if posting comments that you beg for, that you don't happen to like is in your view "vetoing Keith's posts" then you have some pretty severe cognitive problems. If you don't want to take the risk of having people laugh at your flag, don't run it up the pole! And, believe it or not, I really do find it tough to post about anything here on somebody else's behalf, so you will have to learn to live my so-called 'me-centricty' or do the other thing. You could contemplate what *other* people find interesting, Keith. My posting here doesn't stop anyone else posting whatever they like and, it goes without saying, anyone is perfectly at liberty to ignore my posts if they don't like them or even ****terise me. I couldn't care less either way. Except Keith, the whines and screams that assault our ears when people reply to your posts frankly and honestly, tell a different story. You care deeply. Now, comms are still open, got an original thought we'd be interested to hear - on topic, if you prefer? As the old saying goes - you can take a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. So go thirsty, if that's what you want do. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Keith G" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... With you Keith, its all about attitude. Yours. Crappy. Me-centric. My attitude is crappy and me-centric???? So much so that if you were smart or charming, your posts could be a real treat. Eccentric is OK. Ego-centric and willfully ignorant gets boring. Thank you for that little run-down, I can see more clearly now.... Except you don't. I've explained about 'ego-centric' and if you can't grasp the impossibility of me posting about and on behalf of others I can't help you - the wilfully ignorant bit is the one that makes me smile. The idea of relevance seems to has escaped you, Keith. Who TF are you (or anyone else here) to decide what knowledge I (or anybody else here) will address/heed and take on board? General practical knowlege. Common sense. Respect for others. All places you rarely go, Keith. There's a small few here (3.5, actually) who deem this newsgroup a form of 'captive clinic' which exists for the purpose of them airing their knowledge and for 'putting people right' whether or not they want it or not. News for them.... Keith, there's only about 7 people posting here at any one time, so that gives you a 50% failure rate. (Have you no idea that this is the single biggest reason people leave the group?) Keith, as usual you've confused yourself with all people. FYI, I am not the recalcitrant teenager (by some 50 years) Well, there's physical age and mental age... that refuses *to be told* that one or two here seem to think and I am quite capable of deciding with what I will bother my remaining brain cellls and what I will not. I've got no problems, there. I am the first (and almost only) one to ask when/if I need to know as well as being the first to respond to any enquiry I can help with as my kind of payback. What little pratting about with 'audio' I still do is only a fraction of my hobbyist activities and my knowledge intake (via recorded TV programmes) progresses on a daily basis. Enjoy! (Struggling to see how I could improve my performance as a human being, let alone as an active poster here....??) Comms still open (and still waiting for an original thought) but not for much longer if all you are going to post is your never-ending condemnation of me and my posts..?? Like, who TF needs it? Actually Arny, I think we are fast approaching the 'say the word' stage again.... ?? ;-) |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... With you Keith, its all about attitude. Yours. Crappy. Me-centric. My attitude is crappy and me-centric???? So much so that if you were smart or charming, your posts could be a real treat. Eccentric is OK. Ego-centric and willfully ignorant gets boring. Tell me , Arny - do you ever read your own posts, starting with the one above? You are describing yourself perfectly! Lame IKWYABWAI noted. WTF is that when it's at home? Like many things Keith, something that many can recognize but is over *your* head. Anyway, here's news: You don't earn smart and charming posts by forming an 'ad-hom' Attack Pack or carping like in the above post. Here's a news flash for you Keith. Interesting posts are made not earned. It's really not too hard, Arny: Obviously, beyond your limited means, Keith. you got two choices - you either read my posts An opportunity I take all the time. What you don't have is the right to veto them. Right but I do have the right to comment on them. Now Keither, if posting comments that you beg for, that you don't happen to like is in your view "vetoing Keith's posts" then you have some pretty severe cognitive problems. If you don't want to take the risk of having people laugh at your flag, don't run it up the pole! And, believe it or not, I really do find it tough to post about anything here on somebody else's behalf, so you will have to learn to live my so-called 'me-centricty' or do the other thing. You could contemplate what *other* people find interesting, Keith. My posting here doesn't stop anyone else posting whatever they like and, it goes without saying, anyone is perfectly at liberty to ignore my posts if they don't like them or even ****terise me. I couldn't care less either way. Except Keith, the whines and screams that assault our ears when people reply to your posts frankly and honestly, tell a different story. You care deeply. Now, comms are still open, got an original thought we'd be interested to hear - on topic, if you prefer? As the old saying goes - you can take a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. So go thirsty, if that's what you want do. Dear oh dear, what a palaver! |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message New blood, new topics still urgently wanted.... With you Keith, its all about attitude. Yours. Crappy. Me-centric. My attitude is crappy and me-centric???? So much so that if you were smart or charming, your posts could be a real treat. Eccentric is OK. Ego-centric and willfully ignorant gets boring. Thank you for that little run-down, I can see more clearly now.... Except you don't. I've explained about 'ego-centric' and if you can't grasp the impossibility of me posting about and on behalf of others I can't help you - the wilfully ignorant bit is the one that makes me smile. The idea of relevance seems to has escaped you, Keith. Who TF are you (or anyone else here) to decide what knowledge I (or anybody else here) will address/heed and take on board? General practical knowlege. Common sense. Respect for others. All places you rarely go, Keith. There's a small few here (3.5, actually) who deem this newsgroup a form of 'captive clinic' which exists for the purpose of them airing their knowledge and for 'putting people right' whether or not they want it or not. News for them.... Keith, there's only about 7 people posting here at any one time, so that gives you a 50% failure rate. (Have you no idea that this is the single biggest reason people leave the group?) Keith, as usual you've confused yourself with all people. FYI, I am not the recalcitrant teenager (by some 50 years) Well, there's physical age and mental age... that refuses *to be told* that one or two here seem to think and I am quite capable of deciding with what I will bother my remaining brain cellls and what I will not. I've got no problems, there. I am the first (and almost only) one to ask when/if I need to know as well as being the first to respond to any enquiry I can help with as my kind of payback. What little pratting about with 'audio' I still do is only a fraction of my hobbyist activities and my knowledge intake (via recorded TV programmes) progresses on a daily basis. Enjoy! (Struggling to see how I could improve my performance as a human being, let alone as an active poster here....??) Comms still open (and still waiting for an original thought) but not for much longer if all you are going to post is your never-ending condemnation of me and my posts..?? Like, who TF needs it? Actually Arny, I think we are fast approaching the 'say the word' stage again.... I notice that while you are busy flapping your gums you manage to stop short of this bit: Actually Arny, I think we are fast approaching the 'say the word' stage again.... One question, no make that two: 1) Why do you obsess about me? 2) What makes you think I care what you think? |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
In article ,
Fed Up Lurker wrote: Why are you known as "Kitty"? Keith likes to give people nicknames. Dunno why. Trying to be superior, I suppose. So I christened him Kitty. Kit is short for Keith so it seemed very apt - especially as he hates it. -- *If vegetable oil comes from vegetables, where does baby oil come from? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Keith G" wrote in message ... "Fed Up Lurker" wrote quite a lot of guessology But accurate though wasn't it...... Who TF cares either way? You very obviously do.... Why are you known as "Kitty"? I like to dress in women's clothes of an evening... You don't quite understand how the internet and usenet in particular actually works do you, your real life and your online life are now forever open book..... (Anyone else who wants to leave messages on the YT site at least identify who you post as in this group) Good coming from an Anony Mouse like you, ain't it? See previous response. All that has happened is I uploaded a few test clips to YT, and receveived 3 messages in that accounts inbox, I'm not asking anyone to reveal anything about themselves apart from associating themselves with whatever nym they post with to this froop. Are you feeling vulnerable? |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Fed Up Lurker" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message ... "Fed Up Lurker" wrote quite a lot of guessology But accurate though wasn't it...... Who TF cares either way? You very obviously do.... Why are you known as "Kitty"? I like to dress in women's clothes of an evening... You don't quite understand how the internet and usenet in particular actually works do you, your real life and your online life are now forever open book..... (Anyone else who wants to leave messages on the YT site at least identify who you post as in this group) Good coming from an Anony Mouse like you, ain't it? See previous response. All that has happened is I uploaded a few test clips to YT, and receveived 3 messages in that accounts inbox, Everybody does, get over it.... |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Fed Up Lurker wrote: Why are you known as "Kitty"? Keith likes to give people nicknames. Dunno why. Trying to be superior, Oh dear, our inferiority complexes are starting to show.... Not surprising from industry types who hang around in hobbyist newsgroups, I suppose. I suppose. So I christened him Kitty. Kit is short for Keith It is? First time I heard that in 63 years.... (Making it up as he goes along again! ;-) so it seemed very apt - especially as he hates it. Sorry, I couldn't care less - knock yourself out. It helps identify the members of the Attack Pack, if nothing else.... *If vegetable oil comes from vegetables, where does baby oil come from? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Fed Up Lurker" wrote Are you feeling vulnerable? Sorry, missed this bit - vulnerable to what? Could you elucidate? Some people feel vulnerable on motorcycles; and many feel vulnerable on very small bikes - here's me on a monkey bike, the other day: http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/showntell/MonkeyBike.wmv How 'feeling vulnerable' do I look? Take a good look at that old jiffer - do you really think he gives a **** about Usenet ****s hiding behind false names and email addresses trying to work silly, schoolboy mindgames? Here's another clip about a week later: http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/shown...eNewShocks.wmv Spot the difference - there are two (not counting the jumper).... (How's that for 'open book'..?? ;-) |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Keith G" wrote in message ... Some people feel vulnerable on motorcycles; and many feel vulnerable on very small bikes - here's me on a monkey bike, the other day: http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/showntell/MonkeyBike.wmv How 'feeling vulnerable' do I look? Take a good look at that old jiffer - do you really think he gives a **** about Usenet ****s hiding behind false names and email addresses trying to work silly, schoolboy mindgames? Here's another clip about a week later: http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/shown...eNewShocks.wmv Spot the difference - there are two (not counting the jumper).... Are you feeling petulant? I was unable to "spot the difference" as both links are "HTTP-404 file not found", I think I would've quite liked to see the footage, oh well. I'm going back to occassional lurking, there is just too much camp bickering in this group. If you need any advice on updating and getting your computers to function or easy tweaking of your hardware, just post. Toodle pip. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
In article ,
Keith G wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Fed Up Lurker wrote: Why are you known as "Kitty"? Keith likes to give people nicknames. Dunno why. Trying to be superior, Oh dear, our inferiority complexes are starting to show.... Given you started it, just how inferior do you think you are? Not surprising from industry types who hang around in hobbyist newsgroups, I suppose. Err, it's called 'audio'. Something you've ignored for years. If it were 'hi-fi' it could be thought of as a hobbyist group. BTW, how does your pal Churches fit in to your definition? I seem to remember you being up his a**s more than anyone else here. I suppose. So I christened him Kitty. Kit is short for Keith It is? First time I heard that in 63 years.... An abbreviation for either Keith or Christopher. (Making it up as he goes along again! ;-) so it seemed very apt - especially as he hates it. Sorry, I couldn't care less - knock yourself out. It helps identify the members of the Attack Pack, if nothing else.... Methinks you do protest too much... -- *I wish the buck stopped here. I could use a few. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Fed Up Lurker" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message ... Some people feel vulnerable on motorcycles; and many feel vulnerable on very small bikes - here's me on a monkey bike, the other day: http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/showntell/MonkeyBike.wmv How 'feeling vulnerable' do I look? Take a good look at that old jiffer - do you really think he gives a **** about Usenet ****s hiding behind false names and email addresses trying to work silly, schoolboy mindgames? Here's another clip about a week later: http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/shown...eNewShocks.wmv Spot the difference - there are two (not counting the jumper).... Are you feeling petulant? I was unable to "spot the difference" as both links are "HTTP-404 file not found", I think I would've quite liked to see the footage, oh well. I changed my mind and took the clips off my webpage. I might put them back up - check again later. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Fed Up Lurker wrote: Why are you known as "Kitty"? Keith likes to give people nicknames. Dunno why. Trying to be superior, Oh dear, our inferiority complexes are starting to show.... Given you started it, just how inferior do you think you are? Not surprising from industry types who hang around in hobbyist newsgroups, I suppose. Err, it's called 'audio'. Something you've ignored for years. If it were 'hi-fi' it could be thought of as a hobbyist group. BTW, how does your pal Churches fit in to your definition? I seem to remember you being up his a**s more than anyone else here. I suppose. So I christened him Kitty. Kit is short for Keith It is? First time I heard that in 63 years.... An abbreviation for either Keith or Christopher. (Making it up as he goes along again! ;-) so it seemed very apt - especially as he hates it. Sorry, I couldn't care less - knock yourself out. It helps identify the members of the Attack Pack, if nothing else.... Methinks you do protest too much... Are you (and your chum Arny) really comfortable squandering precious 'open comms' time with this sort of drivel? Not to mention the continuing 'OT' aspect.... ?? *I wish the buck stopped here. I could use a few. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Keith G" wrote
Are you (and your chum Arny) Since when has Dave (or indeed anyone else on this ng) been a "chum" of Arny's? Just because they both criticise your posts doesn't mean they have anything else in common, nor that they somehow or other consitute a "pack" David. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote snip name-calling Not surprising from industry types who hang around in hobbyist newsgroups, I suppose. Err, it's called 'audio'. Something you've ignored for years. If it were 'hi-fi' it could be thought of as a hobbyist group. For the benefit of the Lurkers, I would like to draw their attention to the uk.rec.audio charter: http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.rec.audio.html Unless I mistaken, I see the phrase 'hi-fi' mentioned no less than four times in the first paragrah and it doesn't seem to mention anything else much...?? Thus it makes this a *hobbyist* group in my book (and even Mr Plowman's - by his own description above), especially as there are plento of 'pro' and other specialist groups available. So ignore the *trade types* leering about in here trying to impress and lets be having those 'my Dansette/Mark Levinson is playing up' posts...!! BTW, how does your pal Churches fit in to your definition? I seem to remember you being up his a**s more than anyone else here. I don't do 'babyspeak' - what is 'a**s'...?? |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Keith G" wrote in message
... For the benefit of the Lurkers, I would like to draw their attention to the uk.rec.audio charter: http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.rec.audio.html Unless I mistaken, I see the phrase 'hi-fi' mentioned no less than four times in the first paragrah and it doesn't seem to mention anything else much...?? I don't know how many people are in the haboit of reading a group's charter before posting, not many I'd guess. I assumed when I joined that since it was called "uk.rec.*audio* it was about "audio", not "HiFi". Perhaps it needs either a new name or a new charter, since the present name and charter are at odds with each other. David. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"David Looser" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote in message ... For the benefit of the Lurkers, I would like to draw their attention to the uk.rec.audio charter: http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.rec.audio.html Unless I mistaken, I see the phrase 'hi-fi' mentioned no less than four times in the first paragrah and it doesn't seem to mention anything else much...?? I don't know how many people are in the haboit of reading a group's charter before posting, not many I'd guess. I assumed when I joined that since it was called "uk.rec.*audio* it was about "audio", not "HiFi". Understandable, given the group's name; even more so when you see a constant stream of posts putting ordinary, domestic 'hifi' down - 'Dixon's hi-fi' was the last disparaging remark of only a few days ago that I recall...?? Perhaps it needs either a new name or a new charter, since the present name and charter are at odds with each other. No, it's much simpler than that: there's not enough UK-based 'audio' or 'hifi' interest to go round as it is and it shouldn't be beyond the wit of anyone here to be able to succesfully combine the two - all it would take is for a tiny few to stop try to block out anything other than intense techy/electronic topics and treating the place like their private clinic. I personally enjoy the 'non hifi' topics - recording studio stuff for example and I prefer to see general traffic of interesting discussions between forum members who are perhaps like-minded but have other related interests to mention, rather than the forum go to waste with fortnight-long silences. (As do 'others' when it suits them, but start shrieking 'OT' when it starts to drift outside their own comfort zones....) YMMV - all I know is if it slumps into silence again I'm off for good. I don't do necrophila.... |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:57:36 +0100, "David Looser"
wrote: I don't know how many people are in the haboit of reading a group's charter before posting, not many I'd guess. I assumed when I joined that since it was called "uk.rec.*audio* it was about "audio", not "HiFi". Perhaps it needs either a new name or a new charter, since the present name and charter are at odds with each other. I intend to use this group to discuss fish. I had some excellent haddock for dinner yesterday. Certain people's brains will have just exploded. We are well rid if them. |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:57:36 +0100, "David Looser" wrote: snip I intend to use this group to discuss fish. I had some excellent haddock for dinner yesterday. Certain people's brains will have just exploded. We are well rid if them. Was it the full bit rate haddock, mostly get the compacted versions here. Dave :) |
Same old faces, same old faeces.....
In article , Laurence Payne
wrote: On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:57:36 +0100, "David Looser" wrote: I don't know how many people are in the haboit of reading a group's charter before posting, not many I'd guess. I assumed when I joined that since it was called "uk.rec.*audio* it was about "audio", not "HiFi". Perhaps it needs either a new name or a new charter, since the present name and charter are at odds with each other. I intend to use this group to discuss fish. I had some excellent haddock for dinner yesterday. Certain people's brains will have just exploded. We are well rid if them. I think you are just fishing for reactions... Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:02 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk