Only two cycles of messages from an innocent question to the resident
circlejerk of mutual masturbators launching a full-scale personal
attack on the poster. Is anyone surprised that i treat this malicious
scum with open contempt? -- Andre Jute

On Sep 8, 12:12*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Mike Coatham" wrote in message



I am surprised that someone who purports to design &
build amplifiers etc. would have to ask such a basic
question.

Good point. Every Jute amplifier schematic I've seen looked like it was
copied from someplace.

This is electronics 101....... However in the
interests of being helpful, read this link and learn a
little *http://www.rane.com/note109.html

Jute says he's read it, which only makes him look even more strange.

Andre Jute wrote:
Only two cycles of messages from an innocent question to the resident
circlejerk of mutual masturbators launching a full-scale personal
attack on the poster. Is anyone surprised that i treat this malicious
scum with open contempt? -- Andre Jute

Jute,

Just to delurk for a moment.....

Why not just wire the frigging resistors in and see what it sounds like ?

Would be much quicker than messing about in here.

On Sep 9, 9:39*am, "TonyL" wrote:
Andre Jute wrote:
Only two cycles of messages from an innocent question to the resident
circlejerk of mutual masturbators launching a full-scale personal
attack on the poster. Is anyone surprised that i treat this malicious
scum with open contempt? -- Andre Jute

Jute,

Just to delurk for a moment.....

Why not just wire the frigging resistors in and see what it sounds like ?

Would be much quicker than messing about in here.

I was deliberately making a simple talking point. That has succeeded.
There was also the salutary secondary effect of proving once more that
the self-appointed gatekeepers (the jerks I refer to collectively as
"the scum") keep out newbies by making any discussion personally
unpleasant. Who'd want to ask a question if you were treated as I've
been treated by Poopie Stevenson, "Eiron", that New Zealand jerk
Coatham (who actually had the effrontery to label his abuse as
"helpful"!), and the ever-wretched Krueger?

Andre Jute
Noblesse oblige

"Andre Jute" wrote in message

Who'd want to ask a question if
you were treated as I've been treated by Poopie
Stevenson, "Eiron", that New Zealand jerk Coatham (who
actually had the effrontery to label his abuse as
"helpful"!), and the ever-wretched Krueger?

Trust me Andre, we save our *special treatment* for know-it-alls like you.

We give far better treatment to those who we recognize as being fellow
members of the human race. ;-)

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Andre Jute" wrote in message

Who'd want to ask a question if
you were treated as I've been treated by Poopie
Stevenson, "Eiron", that New Zealand jerk Coatham (who
actually had the effrontery to label his abuse as
"helpful"!), and the ever-wretched Krueger?

Trust me Andre, we save our *special treatment* for know-it-alls like you.

We?

We give far better treatment to those who we recognize as being fellow
members of the human race. ;-)

We?

The use of the personal pronoun in the 1st person plural
is reserved for:

1. Those who speak on behalf of others.
2. Royalty.

Despite what you may wish us to believe, Arny,
you qualify in neither category:-)

Iain