Hi-end audio hardware aesthetics?
On Oct 17, 1:54*pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 16, 1:39*pm, Boon wrote:
On Oct 16, 2:59*pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 16, 8:21*am, Boon wrote:
On Oct 16, 3:59*am, "Fed Up Lurker"
wrote:
"Boon" wrote in message
...
On Oct 15, 4:17 pm, "Fed Up Lurker"
wrote:
Did you really have them playing in your system? If you did then you
would've taken a few pictures of yourself posing beside them. upload
the pix to something like Flickr, I only suggest this so as to cast aside
any doubts some may have....
Or, you could look at my blog (the one you said that you read, heh
heh) and see the evidence.
Hi Boonie
There is no evidence on your blog?
Yes, there is. There are quite a few posts about receiving them,
unpacking them and setting them up, all with photos. In a couple of
the entries, there are congratulatory comments from the US distributor
on purchasing them. Duh.
*There is nothing to show that you
have actually demo'd those speakers.
Demo'd? What the hell are you talking about? I own a pair. They're in
my listening room.
There maybe doubting Thomas's
who may try to suggest you looked up an expensive model that is unlikely
to ever be heard by any in these groups and concocted a "review"?
So far you're the only one. And you're a bit thick in the head it
seems. I have no desire to prove anything to someone like you. I've
been on RAO for 12 years, and most of the people there know me, have
been to my house or know me on a professional level.
*I don't doubt you have some new speakers. I doubt your claims on
their performance as you've never demonstrated on any gear you've ever
owned any decent bass.
What are my claims to their performance?
Same 'ol boring crap and backpedaling.
No, I asked you to back up your statement with proof. YOU'RE the one
who just backpedaled by failing to prove your statement. Why? Because
you're so dumb, that you forgot what happened the last time you
brought this up...it turned out you mixed up two different speakers in
your addled little mind
..
*You've made some ridiculous claims on speakers...claiming one set was
flat to 30hz (which the 50 hz spec did not come close to support) only
to amend that claim to require room was required correction to get the
output required.
Name the speaker that I said was flat to 30hz and was actually really
just flat to 50 hz.
*flat to 50 would have been generous... I think it was your Zu or
their successors.
You THINK? You mean you don't know for sure? But you thought you'd
just throw it out there to see if I would crush you into the ground
again? That sound about right, Scott? Huh? Is that right?
*Doesn't matter, you won't stand behind your BS....again.
No, moron. I won't stand behind YOUR BS...again.
(snip the irrelevant obfuscations)
Every time you snip, it's something that makes you look dumb.
I might as well throw a saddle on you and ride you around RAO. That's
how much I control you.
|