"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"David Looser" wrote in
message
"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"SpamTrapSeeSig" wrote
in message ...
In article
, Arny
Krueger writes
This begs the question why we don't worry about
reflections on unterminated
CAT5. The reason is that each CAT5 cable connects
only 2 points, and if one
point is disconnected, theres no other device whose
reception is adversely
affected by the reflections.

I don't think that's right.


Arny not right?

*Impossible* - just ask him!


Actually in this instance Arny *is* right.
"SpamTrapSeeSig" misunderstood the point.


Oh David, you're killing Keith. In his world I'm wrong
until proven right. ;-)

It's the same for everybody in these newsgroups! ;-)

No. There are people here whose comments should be taken at face value.


Why?


And others who come close to deserving a blanket dismissal out of hand.


Why?