"Keith G" wrote in message
...


Love the way you learned the 'judicious snipping game' - most impressive!
Who was your rôle model - Arny?

I don't play a "'judicious snipping game", and never have. I snip out
everything from a previous post that is not relevant to my reply to make the
post easier to read and to stop the posts in a thread getting longer and
longer, in the process making it harder and harder to find the new content.
Since the post to which I reply is always still there in the thread anyone
who wants to read it in full can do so.

It's make your mind up time!


Ooh, such pressure!

Umm...

Errr...

OK, it's gotta be CDs sound sterile.


Yet you couldn't tell one from t'other.

David.

"David Looser" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message
...


Love the way you learned the 'judicious snipping game' - most impressive!
Who was your rôle model - Arny?

I don't play a "'judicious snipping game", and never have. I snip out
everything from a previous post that is not relevant to my reply to make
the post easier to read and to stop the posts in a thread getting longer
and longer, in the process making it harder and harder to find the new
content. Since the post to which I reply is always still there in the
thread anyone who wants to read it in full can do so.


Exactly what I do but it hasn't stopped me being accused of 'judicious' (if
not malicious) snipping from certain quarters.



It's make your mind up time!


Ooh, such pressure!

Umm...

Errr...

OK, it's gotta be CDs sound sterile.


Yet you couldn't tell one from t'other.


Quite right - could you?

:-)

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"David Looser" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message
...


Love the way you learned the 'judicious snipping game' - most
impressive! Who was your rôle model - Arny?

I don't play a "'judicious snipping game", and never have. I snip out
everything from a previous post that is not relevant to my reply to make
the post easier to read and to stop the posts in a thread getting longer
and longer, in the process making it harder and harder to find the new
content. Since the post to which I reply is always still there in the
thread anyone who wants to read it in full can do so.


Exactly what I do but it hasn't stopped me being accused of 'judicious'
(if not malicious) snipping from certain quarters.


Well I know nothing about that, all I know is that *I* have never accused
you of "judicious snipping".

It's make your mind up time!


Ooh, such pressure!

Umm...

Errr...

OK, it's gotta be CDs sound sterile.


Yet you couldn't tell one from t'other.


Quite right - could you?


Only by the lower noise level on the "silent" bit at the end.

David.

"David Looser" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"David Looser" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message
...


Love the way you learned the 'judicious snipping game' - most
impressive! Who was your rôle model - Arny?

I don't play a "'judicious snipping game", and never have. I snip out
everything from a previous post that is not relevant to my reply to make
the post easier to read and to stop the posts in a thread getting longer
and longer, in the process making it harder and harder to find the new
content. Since the post to which I reply is always still there in the
thread anyone who wants to read it in full can do so.


Exactly what I do but it hasn't stopped me being accused of 'judicious'
(if not malicious) snipping from certain quarters.


Well I know nothing about that, all I know is that *I* have never accused
you of "judicious snipping".


I never said you had.




It's make your mind up time!


Ooh, such pressure!

Umm...

Errr...

OK, it's gotta be CDs sound sterile.


Yet you couldn't tell one from t'other.


Quite right - could you?


Only by the lower noise level on the "silent" bit at the end.


Not by the way in which the voices were rendered then?

That vinyl was the end of side, you may be interested to know.

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"David Looser" wrote in message



Well I know nothing about that, all I know is that *I* have never accused
you of "judicious snipping".


I never said you had.

So why hurl that particular complaint at me then? I'm not Arny and I don't
speak for him.


Yet you couldn't tell one from t'other.


Quite right - could you?


Only by the lower noise level on the "silent" bit at the end.


Not by the way in which the voices were rendered then?

No. As I said earlier the sound quality (both versions) wasn't that good.

That vinyl was the end of side, you may be interested to know.

I'm not.

David.

In article ,
David Looser wrote:
Well I know nothing about that, all I know is that *I* have never
accused you of "judicious snipping".


I never said you had.

So why hurl that particular complaint at me then? I'm not Arny and I
don't speak for him.

'Them' and 'us' situation?

--
*If only you'd use your powers for good instead of evil.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.