
October 21st 11, 12:56 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Horn low frequency response
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:40:55 +0100, "David Looser"
wrote:
"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:16:27 +0100, Peter Chant
wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
I just wonder how the partical accelerators work.
Just a tiny clue?
URL posted earlier in the thread.
Reminds me of this insane under floor speaker..
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom.htm
Well, yes, that was what prompted my post. It is yours I don't
understand.
The web-page describing this "insane" speaker system includes the line:
"The Royal Device Audio Room features 3 sub-atomic particle accelerators on
SPDIF
data transmission",
whatever that is supposed to mean.
Presumably Peter Chant is refering that that.
David.
He read it? I'm impressed. I just looked at the pictures.
d
|

October 21st 11, 11:47 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Horn low frequency response
Don Pearce wrote:
He read it? I'm impressed. I just looked at the pictures.
d
Sorry, I scanned through the web page and saw the 'partical accelerators'
and assumed everyone else would do the same.
--
http://www.petezilla.co.uk
|

October 22nd 11, 08:07 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Horn low frequency response
"Peter Chant" wrote in message
...
Don Pearce wrote:
He read it? I'm impressed. I just looked at the pictures.
d
Sorry, I scanned through the web page and saw the 'partical accelerators'
and assumed everyone else would do the same.
Except, of course, that the reference was to "particle accelerators". To
mis-spell it once might be regarded as a misfortune, to do so twice looks
like carelessness (with apologies to Oscar Wilde) :-)
David.
|

October 22nd 11, 08:19 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Horn low frequency response
In article , David Looser
wrote:
"Peter Chant" wrote in message
...
Don Pearce wrote:
He read it? I'm impressed. I just looked at the pictures.
d
Sorry, I scanned through the web page and saw the 'partical
accelerators' and assumed everyone else would do the same.
Except, of course, that the reference was to "particle accelerators". To
mis-spell it once might be regarded as a misfortune, to do so twice
looks like carelessness (with apologies to Oscar Wilde) :-)
I had a quick look and decided reading tiny text against a dark background
wasn't worth the effort! :-)
Slainte,
Jim
--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html
|

October 22nd 11, 09:49 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Horn low frequency response
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:07:17 +0100, "David Looser"
wrote:
"Peter Chant" wrote in message
...
Don Pearce wrote:
He read it? I'm impressed. I just looked at the pictures.
d
Sorry, I scanned through the web page and saw the 'partical accelerators'
and assumed everyone else would do the same.
Except, of course, that the reference was to "particle accelerators". To
mis-spell it once might be regarded as a misfortune, to do so twice looks
like carelessness (with apologies to Oscar Wilde) :-)
The third time it is enemy action (apologies to Ian Fleming). Only the
first two were happenstance and coincidence.
d
|

October 22nd 11, 10:48 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Horn low frequency response
David Looser wrote:
Except, of course, that the reference was to "particle accelerators". To
mis-spell it once might be regarded as a misfortune, to do so twice looks
like carelessness (with apologies to Oscar Wilde) :-)
I go for consistency.
--
http://www.petezilla.co.uk
|

October 25th 11, 10:13 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Horn low frequency response
I had a quick look and decided reading tiny text against a
dark background wasn't worth the effort! :-)
Slainte,
Jim
Ctrl+Mouse wheel up.
D
|

October 25th 11, 12:18 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Horn low frequency response
In article ,
Jim Lesurf wrote:
Except, of course, that the reference was to "particle accelerators".
To mis-spell it once might be regarded as a misfortune, to do so twice
looks like carelessness (with apologies to Oscar Wilde) :-)
I had a quick look and decided reading tiny text against a dark
background wasn't worth the effort! :-)
With Oregano 1 - which I still sometimes use with RISC OS - turning off
background and/or foreground colours gets rid of most of that nonsense.
You end up with black text on a white background.
--
*Too many clicks spoil the browse *
Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
|

October 25th 11, 04:06 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Horn low frequency response
In article , Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article , Jim Lesurf
wrote:
Except, of course, that the reference was to "particle
accelerators". To mis-spell it once might be regarded as a
misfortune, to do so twice looks like carelessness (with apologies
to Oscar Wilde) :-)
I had a quick look and decided reading tiny text against a dark
background wasn't worth the effort! :-)
With Oregano 1 - which I still sometimes use with RISC OS - turning off
background and/or foreground colours gets rid of most of that nonsense.
You end up with black text on a white background.
I was using NetSurf on RO so did think of exporting as a DrawFile and then
trying to make sense of that. But from what I'd seen it didn't seem worth
the effort.
Slainte,
Jim
--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|