A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Horn low frequency response



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old October 21st 11, 12:56 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,358
Default Horn low frequency response

On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:40:55 +0100, "David Looser"
wrote:

"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:16:27 +0100, Peter Chant
wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:



I just wonder how the partical accelerators work.

Just a tiny clue?


URL posted earlier in the thread.

Reminds me of this insane under floor speaker..
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom.htm


Well, yes, that was what prompted my post. It is yours I don't
understand.


The web-page describing this "insane" speaker system includes the line:
"The Royal Device Audio Room features 3 sub-atomic particle accelerators on
SPDIF
data transmission",

whatever that is supposed to mean.

Presumably Peter Chant is refering that that.

David.



He read it? I'm impressed. I just looked at the pictures.

d
  #12 (permalink)  
Old October 21st 11, 11:47 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Peter Chant[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Horn low frequency response

Don Pearce wrote:



He read it? I'm impressed. I just looked at the pictures.

d


Sorry, I scanned through the web page and saw the 'partical accelerators'
and assumed everyone else would do the same.

--
http://www.petezilla.co.uk
  #13 (permalink)  
Old October 22nd 11, 08:07 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
David Looser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,883
Default Horn low frequency response

"Peter Chant" wrote in message
...
Don Pearce wrote:



He read it? I'm impressed. I just looked at the pictures.

d


Sorry, I scanned through the web page and saw the 'partical accelerators'
and assumed everyone else would do the same.


Except, of course, that the reference was to "particle accelerators". To
mis-spell it once might be regarded as a misfortune, to do so twice looks
like carelessness (with apologies to Oscar Wilde) :-)

David.


  #14 (permalink)  
Old October 22nd 11, 08:19 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,668
Default Horn low frequency response

In article , David Looser
wrote:
"Peter Chant" wrote in message
...
Don Pearce wrote:



He read it? I'm impressed. I just looked at the pictures.

d


Sorry, I scanned through the web page and saw the 'partical
accelerators' and assumed everyone else would do the same.


Except, of course, that the reference was to "particle accelerators". To
mis-spell it once might be regarded as a misfortune, to do so twice
looks like carelessness (with apologies to Oscar Wilde) :-)


I had a quick look and decided reading tiny text against a dark background
wasn't worth the effort! :-)

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

  #15 (permalink)  
Old October 22nd 11, 09:49 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,358
Default Horn low frequency response

On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:07:17 +0100, "David Looser"
wrote:

"Peter Chant" wrote in message
...
Don Pearce wrote:



He read it? I'm impressed. I just looked at the pictures.

d


Sorry, I scanned through the web page and saw the 'partical accelerators'
and assumed everyone else would do the same.


Except, of course, that the reference was to "particle accelerators". To
mis-spell it once might be regarded as a misfortune, to do so twice looks
like carelessness (with apologies to Oscar Wilde) :-)


The third time it is enemy action (apologies to Ian Fleming). Only the
first two were happenstance and coincidence.

d
  #16 (permalink)  
Old October 22nd 11, 10:48 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Peter Chant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default Horn low frequency response

David Looser wrote:

Except, of course, that the reference was to "particle accelerators". To
mis-spell it once might be regarded as a misfortune, to do so twice looks
like carelessness (with apologies to Oscar Wilde) :-)


I go for consistency.

--
http://www.petezilla.co.uk
  #17 (permalink)  
Old October 25th 11, 10:13 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
David B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Horn low frequency response

I had a quick look and decided reading tiny text against a
dark background wasn't worth the effort! :-)

Slainte,

Jim


Ctrl+Mouse wheel up.

D
  #18 (permalink)  
Old October 25th 11, 12:18 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Dave Plowman (News)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,872
Default Horn low frequency response

In article ,
Jim Lesurf wrote:
Except, of course, that the reference was to "particle accelerators".
To mis-spell it once might be regarded as a misfortune, to do so twice
looks like carelessness (with apologies to Oscar Wilde) :-)


I had a quick look and decided reading tiny text against a dark
background wasn't worth the effort! :-)


With Oregano 1 - which I still sometimes use with RISC OS - turning off
background and/or foreground colours gets rid of most of that nonsense.
You end up with black text on a white background.

--
*Too many clicks spoil the browse *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #19 (permalink)  
Old October 25th 11, 04:06 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,668
Default Horn low frequency response

In article , Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article , Jim Lesurf
wrote:
Except, of course, that the reference was to "particle
accelerators". To mis-spell it once might be regarded as a
misfortune, to do so twice looks like carelessness (with apologies
to Oscar Wilde) :-)


I had a quick look and decided reading tiny text against a dark
background wasn't worth the effort! :-)


With Oregano 1 - which I still sometimes use with RISC OS - turning off
background and/or foreground colours gets rid of most of that nonsense.
You end up with black text on a white background.


I was using NetSurf on RO so did think of exporting as a DrawFile and then
trying to make sense of that. But from what I'd seen it didn't seem worth
the effort.

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

  #20 (permalink)  
Old October 25th 11, 04:09 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,668
Default Horn low frequency response

In article , David B
wrote:
I had a quick look and decided reading tiny text against a dark
background wasn't worth the effort! :-)



Ctrl+Mouse wheel up.


Afraid I have no idea what they may do with whatever browser you use. All
it does with NetSurf on RO is pop up the standard menu. Are you assuming
everyone uses the same browser and OS?

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.