Plowman- whip out a spectrum analyzer and check your statement.


** Where is it ??

You over snipping idiot.


I think you'll find at least 95% of the energy is within that
bandwidth.


** ********.


.... Phil

On 24/11/2011 09:16, Phil Allison wrote:


Plowman- whip out a spectrum analyzer and check your statement.


** Where is it ??

You over snipping idiot.


Non-hyphenating imbecile.

I think you'll find at least 95% of the energy is within that
bandwidth.


** ********.


... Phil


Non-sig-separator using ****.


--

"sender"

** **** off.

In article ,
Eiron wrote:
Don't give a stuff where the energy is. 400 to 4k is approx telephone
bandwidth. If you think that produces lifelike speech quality you need
new ears.

Those Gales have tweeters as well. :-)

Different argument.

I think the point was that the crossover frequency was a bit higher than
other speakers.

Which makes them somehow perfect? It's a choice made by the designer
taking all sorts of other things into account. Not just the crossover
frequencies.

There was one BBC design - built pretty well regardless of cost - which
crossed over at approx 1kHz.

--
*Monday is an awful way to spend 1/7th of your life *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.