In article op.xmbz88l7g15l5m@jamesm6700, James Perrett
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:46:24 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote:

I have the impression that the software you suggested, though, isn't
for Linux and isn't open source. So isn't particularly attractive for
me. As much as anything I'm wondering about this from the POV of
examining results versus method in detail.


No - they're not open source but I'm not aware of anything that is
anywhere close to that standard that is open source. There's still
plenty of money to be made creating decent restoration software and,
if you want to work at that level, you'll probably spend years
developing your system.


Yes, I'm sure that's correct, particularly if I wanted to produce something
that *reliably* automated the bulk of the process! And I doubt I could beat
the serious pro products.

However I'm really just trying to find a way to make it easier to 'flag'
the positions of most clicks sufficiently reliably to speed up dealing with
the 'by hand'. This is partly because I don't trust highly automated
correction. Partly because I'm just wanting to save some time for some rare
cases. Hopefully in the process helping others who occasionally want to do
this kind of thing in a similar way.

If you want a few shortcuts then I'd spend a little time checking out
the libraries at

http://www.cockos.com/wdl/

Ta! I'll have a look.

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html