A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Dual 505



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old February 16th 15, 08:17 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Trevor Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 801
Default Dual 505

On 17/02/2015 7:11 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/02/2015 1:04 AM, Sumatriptan wrote:
Yesterday, I got a Dual 505 on Ebay for £77. I know there are Denons,
Thorens etc. around but I have a budget...

Here's why I chose it:

The price was right! I've seen them on sale for £120+ and another Dual
505 on Ebay for 'spares or repairs' went for £60 just after I snagged
mine.


**The 505 was a disaster. You WILL be sorry. The 505-1 & 505-2 ,etc were
brilliant.


**OOps. Should read: "The 505-2 & 505-3, etc...."

There never was a 505-1. It was just the 505.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

  #2 (permalink)  
Old February 16th 15, 08:40 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Sumatriptan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 59
Default Dual 505

On 16/02/2015 21:17, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/02/2015 7:11 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/02/2015 1:04 AM, Sumatriptan wrote:
Yesterday, I got a Dual 505 on Ebay for £77. I know there are Denons,
Thorens etc. around but I have a budget...

Here's why I chose it:

The price was right! I've seen them on sale for £120+ and another Dual
505 on Ebay for 'spares or repairs' went for £60 just after I snagged
mine.


**The 505 was a disaster. You WILL be sorry. The 505-1 & 505-2 ,etc were
brilliant.


**OOps. Should read: "The 505-2 & 505-3, etc...."

There never was a 505-1. It was just the 505.


Whatever, it was the first of the 505s.

As you will realise, it has a headshell adapter fitted to accomodate the
Shure cartridge.

So, why was this model 'a disaster' ?

  #3 (permalink)  
Old February 16th 15, 08:58 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Trevor Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 801
Default Dual 505

On 17/02/2015 8:40 AM, Sumatriptan wrote:
On 16/02/2015 21:17, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/02/2015 7:11 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/02/2015 1:04 AM, Sumatriptan wrote:
Yesterday, I got a Dual 505 on Ebay for £77. I know there are Denons,
Thorens etc. around but I have a budget...

Here's why I chose it:

The price was right! I've seen them on sale for £120+ and another Dual
505 on Ebay for 'spares or repairs' went for £60 just after I snagged
mine.

**The 505 was a disaster. You WILL be sorry. The 505-1 & 505-2 ,etc were
brilliant.


**OOps. Should read: "The 505-2 & 505-3, etc...."

There never was a 505-1. It was just the 505.


Whatever, it was the first of the 505s.

As you will realise, it has a headshell adapter fitted to accomodate the
Shure cartridge.

So, why was this model 'a disaster' ?


**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are NLA.

Send it back.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

  #4 (permalink)  
Old February 17th 15, 09:28 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Sumatriptan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 59
Default Dual 505

On 16/02/2015 21:58, Trevor Wilson wrote:


**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are NLA.

Send it back.


I see people discussing fitting of CS505-3 or later headshells. (Not a
trivial task, apparently) But my understanding was that this was related
to cartridge compatibility and an alternative to the adapter kits. I
haven't seen any online info on the early ones actually falling apart.
If you could point me to such info on the mode of failure I would be
interested.

From the photos, the adapter on this CS505 does not look pretty and
must add some mass and therefore may affect performance. I'll take a
good look when it arrives.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old February 17th 15, 05:05 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
RJH[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 214
Default Dual 505

On 17/02/2015 10:28, Sumatriptan wrote:
On 16/02/2015 21:58, Trevor Wilson wrote:


**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are NLA.


Nonsense. I had one with near daily use for over 10 years, with and
without the 1/2" converter. Never missed a beat.

Can't speak for Antipodean imports :-)

Send it back.


I see people discussing fitting of CS505-3 or later headshells. (Not a
trivial task, apparently) But my understanding was that this was related
to cartridge compatibility and an alternative to the adapter kits. I
haven't seen any online info on the early ones actually falling apart.
If you could point me to such info on the mode of failure I would be
interested.


Don't hold your breath :-)

From the photos, the adapter on this CS505 does not look pretty and
must add some mass and therefore may affect performance. I'll take a
good look when it arrives.


It looks a little clumsy but works surprisingly well - and adds
considerable versatility, of course.

I like the Dual 505. A big thing for me is speed stability, and I found
the Dual good for a belt drive. The best I found was a Pink Triangle LPT
- which considering the Heath Robinson appearance I found amazing.

I use an old Technics 1200 at the moment - very pleased.

--
Cheers, Rob
  #6 (permalink)  
Old February 18th 15, 08:16 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
David B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Dual 505

"RJH" wrote in message
...
On 17/02/2015 10:28, Sumatriptan wrote:
On 16/02/2015 21:58, Trevor Wilson wrote:


**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are
NLA.


Nonsense. I had one with near daily use for over 10 years, with and
without the 1/2" converter. Never missed a beat.

Can't speak for Antipodean imports :-)

Send it back.


I see people discussing fitting of CS505-3 or later headshells. (Not a
trivial task, apparently) But my understanding was that this was related
to cartridge compatibility and an alternative to the adapter kits. I
haven't seen any online info on the early ones actually falling apart.
If you could point me to such info on the mode of failure I would be
interested.


Don't hold your breath :-)

From the photos, the adapter on this CS505 does not look pretty and
must add some mass and therefore may affect performance. I'll take a
good look when it arrives.


It looks a little clumsy but works surprisingly well - and adds
considerable versatility, of course.

I like the Dual 505. A big thing for me is speed stability, and I found
the Dual good for a belt drive. The best I found was a Pink Triangle LPT -
which considering the Heath Robinson appearance I found amazing.

I use an old Technics 1200 at the moment - very pleased.


I'm down to one Pink Triangle now (PT1) and a Townshend Rock. I still think
the PT sounds considerably better than a seriously upgraded LP12.
What arm have you got on your SL1200?

--
David

  #7 (permalink)  
Old February 18th 15, 10:57 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
RJH[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 214
Default Dual 505

On 18/02/2015 09:16, David B wrote:
"RJH" wrote in message
...
On 17/02/2015 10:28, Sumatriptan wrote:
On 16/02/2015 21:58, Trevor Wilson wrote:


**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are
NLA.


Nonsense. I had one with near daily use for over 10 years, with and
without the 1/2" converter. Never missed a beat.

Can't speak for Antipodean imports :-)

Send it back.


I see people discussing fitting of CS505-3 or later headshells. (Not a
trivial task, apparently) But my understanding was that this was

related
to cartridge compatibility and an alternative to the adapter kits. I
haven't seen any online info on the early ones actually falling apart.
If you could point me to such info on the mode of failure I would be
interested.


Don't hold your breath :-)

From the photos, the adapter on this CS505 does not look pretty and
must add some mass and therefore may affect performance. I'll take a
good look when it arrives.


It looks a little clumsy but works surprisingly well - and adds
considerable versatility, of course.

I like the Dual 505. A big thing for me is speed stability, and I
found the Dual good for a belt drive. The best I found was a Pink
Triangle LPT - which considering the Heath Robinson appearance I found
amazing.

I use an old Technics 1200 at the moment - very pleased.


I'm down to one Pink Triangle now (PT1) and a Townshend Rock. I still
think the PT sounds considerably better than a seriously upgraded LP12.
What arm have you got on your SL1200?


The standard arm. Seems fine with either an AT MM or MC. I did have a
1200 with an SME. TBH, can't hear much difference, but the SME looked
nicer :-)

--
Cheers, Rob
  #8 (permalink)  
Old February 17th 15, 09:13 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Trevor Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 801
Default Dual 505

On 17/02/2015 9:28 PM, Sumatriptan wrote:
On 16/02/2015 21:58, Trevor Wilson wrote:


**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are NLA.

Send it back.


I see people discussing fitting of CS505-3 or later headshells. (Not a
trivial task, apparently)


**A nonsensically complicated job. Forget it.


But my understanding was that this was related
to cartridge compatibility and an alternative to the adapter kits. I
haven't seen any online info on the early ones actually falling apart.
If you could point me to such info on the mode of failure I would be
interested.


**The headshell falls apart. I suspect the plastic used is not a stable
product like ABS, but is something inferior. As for reports, just do a
search. You'll receive a large number of results.




From the photos, the adapter on this CS505 does not look pretty and
must add some mass and therefore may affect performance. I'll take a
good look when it arrives.


**Send it back. Look for a later model.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

  #9 (permalink)  
Old February 18th 15, 04:13 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,358
Default Dual 505

On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:13:55 +1100, Trevor Wilson
wrote:

On 17/02/2015 9:28 PM, Sumatriptan wrote:
On 16/02/2015 21:58, Trevor Wilson wrote:


**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are NLA.

Send it back.


I see people discussing fitting of CS505-3 or later headshells. (Not a
trivial task, apparently)


**A nonsensically complicated job. Forget it.


But my understanding was that this was related
to cartridge compatibility and an alternative to the adapter kits. I
haven't seen any online info on the early ones actually falling apart.
If you could point me to such info on the mode of failure I would be
interested.


**The headshell falls apart. I suspect the plastic used is not a stable
product like ABS, but is something inferior. As for reports, just do a
search. You'll receive a large number of results.




From the photos, the adapter on this CS505 does not look pretty and
must add some mass and therefore may affect performance. I'll take a
good look when it arrives.


**Send it back. Look for a later model.


ABS is not UV stable. There is an alternative called PCABS which is
used instead.

d
  #10 (permalink)  
Old February 18th 15, 04:58 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Trevor Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 801
Default Dual 505

On 18/02/2015 4:13 PM, Don Pearce wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:13:55 +1100, Trevor Wilson
wrote:

On 17/02/2015 9:28 PM, Sumatriptan wrote:
On 16/02/2015 21:58, Trevor Wilson wrote:


**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are NLA.

Send it back.


I see people discussing fitting of CS505-3 or later headshells. (Not a
trivial task, apparently)


**A nonsensically complicated job. Forget it.


But my understanding was that this was related
to cartridge compatibility and an alternative to the adapter kits. I
haven't seen any online info on the early ones actually falling apart.
If you could point me to such info on the mode of failure I would be
interested.


**The headshell falls apart. I suspect the plastic used is not a stable
product like ABS, but is something inferior. As for reports, just do a
search. You'll receive a large number of results.




From the photos, the adapter on this CS505 does not look pretty and
must add some mass and therefore may affect performance. I'll take a
good look when it arrives.


**Send it back. Look for a later model.


ABS is not UV stable. There is an alternative called PCABS which is
used instead.


**Thanks for that info. I thought ABS was quite stable.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.