
February 16th 15, 08:17 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Dual 505
On 17/02/2015 7:11 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/02/2015 1:04 AM, Sumatriptan wrote:
Yesterday, I got a Dual 505 on Ebay for £77. I know there are Denons,
Thorens etc. around but I have a budget...
Here's why I chose it:
The price was right! I've seen them on sale for £120+ and another Dual
505 on Ebay for 'spares or repairs' went for £60 just after I snagged
mine.
**The 505 was a disaster. You WILL be sorry. The 505-1 & 505-2 ,etc were
brilliant.
**OOps. Should read: "The 505-2 & 505-3, etc...."
There never was a 505-1. It was just the 505.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
|

February 16th 15, 08:40 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Dual 505
On 16/02/2015 21:17, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/02/2015 7:11 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/02/2015 1:04 AM, Sumatriptan wrote:
Yesterday, I got a Dual 505 on Ebay for £77. I know there are Denons,
Thorens etc. around but I have a budget...
Here's why I chose it:
The price was right! I've seen them on sale for £120+ and another Dual
505 on Ebay for 'spares or repairs' went for £60 just after I snagged
mine.
**The 505 was a disaster. You WILL be sorry. The 505-1 & 505-2 ,etc were
brilliant.
**OOps. Should read: "The 505-2 & 505-3, etc...."
There never was a 505-1. It was just the 505.
Whatever, it was the first of the 505s.
As you will realise, it has a headshell adapter fitted to accomodate the
Shure cartridge.
So, why was this model 'a disaster' ?
|

February 16th 15, 08:58 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Dual 505
On 17/02/2015 8:40 AM, Sumatriptan wrote:
On 16/02/2015 21:17, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/02/2015 7:11 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/02/2015 1:04 AM, Sumatriptan wrote:
Yesterday, I got a Dual 505 on Ebay for £77. I know there are Denons,
Thorens etc. around but I have a budget...
Here's why I chose it:
The price was right! I've seen them on sale for £120+ and another Dual
505 on Ebay for 'spares or repairs' went for £60 just after I snagged
mine.
**The 505 was a disaster. You WILL be sorry. The 505-1 & 505-2 ,etc were
brilliant.
**OOps. Should read: "The 505-2 & 505-3, etc...."
There never was a 505-1. It was just the 505.
Whatever, it was the first of the 505s.
As you will realise, it has a headshell adapter fitted to accomodate the
Shure cartridge.
So, why was this model 'a disaster' ?
**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are NLA.
Send it back.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
|

February 17th 15, 09:28 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Dual 505
On 16/02/2015 21:58, Trevor Wilson wrote:
**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are NLA.
Send it back.
I see people discussing fitting of CS505-3 or later headshells. (Not a
trivial task, apparently) But my understanding was that this was related
to cartridge compatibility and an alternative to the adapter kits. I
haven't seen any online info on the early ones actually falling apart.
If you could point me to such info on the mode of failure I would be
interested.
From the photos, the adapter on this CS505 does not look pretty and
must add some mass and therefore may affect performance. I'll take a
good look when it arrives.
|

February 18th 15, 10:57 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Dual 505
On 18/02/2015 09:16, David B wrote:
"RJH" wrote in message
...
On 17/02/2015 10:28, Sumatriptan wrote:
On 16/02/2015 21:58, Trevor Wilson wrote:
**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are
NLA.
Nonsense. I had one with near daily use for over 10 years, with and
without the 1/2" converter. Never missed a beat.
Can't speak for Antipodean imports :-)
Send it back.
I see people discussing fitting of CS505-3 or later headshells. (Not a
trivial task, apparently) But my understanding was that this was
related
to cartridge compatibility and an alternative to the adapter kits. I
haven't seen any online info on the early ones actually falling apart.
If you could point me to such info on the mode of failure I would be
interested.
Don't hold your breath :-)
From the photos, the adapter on this CS505 does not look pretty and
must add some mass and therefore may affect performance. I'll take a
good look when it arrives.
It looks a little clumsy but works surprisingly well - and adds
considerable versatility, of course.
I like the Dual 505. A big thing for me is speed stability, and I
found the Dual good for a belt drive. The best I found was a Pink
Triangle LPT - which considering the Heath Robinson appearance I found
amazing.
I use an old Technics 1200 at the moment - very pleased.
I'm down to one Pink Triangle now (PT1) and a Townshend Rock. I still
think the PT sounds considerably better than a seriously upgraded LP12.
What arm have you got on your SL1200?
The standard arm. Seems fine with either an AT MM or MC. I did have a
1200 with an SME. TBH, can't hear much difference, but the SME looked
nicer :-)
--
Cheers, Rob
|

February 17th 15, 09:13 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Dual 505
On 17/02/2015 9:28 PM, Sumatriptan wrote:
On 16/02/2015 21:58, Trevor Wilson wrote:
**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are NLA.
Send it back.
I see people discussing fitting of CS505-3 or later headshells. (Not a
trivial task, apparently)
**A nonsensically complicated job. Forget it.
But my understanding was that this was related
to cartridge compatibility and an alternative to the adapter kits. I
haven't seen any online info on the early ones actually falling apart.
If you could point me to such info on the mode of failure I would be
interested.
**The headshell falls apart. I suspect the plastic used is not a stable
product like ABS, but is something inferior. As for reports, just do a
search. You'll receive a large number of results.
From the photos, the adapter on this CS505 does not look pretty and
must add some mass and therefore may affect performance. I'll take a
good look when it arrives.
**Send it back. Look for a later model.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
|

February 18th 15, 04:58 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Dual 505
On 18/02/2015 4:13 PM, Don Pearce wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:13:55 +1100, Trevor Wilson
wrote:
On 17/02/2015 9:28 PM, Sumatriptan wrote:
On 16/02/2015 21:58, Trevor Wilson wrote:
**The headshell falls apart IN EVERY SINGLE ONE. The headshells are NLA.
Send it back.
I see people discussing fitting of CS505-3 or later headshells. (Not a
trivial task, apparently)
**A nonsensically complicated job. Forget it.
But my understanding was that this was related
to cartridge compatibility and an alternative to the adapter kits. I
haven't seen any online info on the early ones actually falling apart.
If you could point me to such info on the mode of failure I would be
interested.
**The headshell falls apart. I suspect the plastic used is not a stable
product like ABS, but is something inferior. As for reports, just do a
search. You'll receive a large number of results.
From the photos, the adapter on this CS505 does not look pretty and
must add some mass and therefore may affect performance. I'll take a
good look when it arrives.
**Send it back. Look for a later model.
ABS is not UV stable. There is an alternative called PCABS which is
used instead.
**Thanks for that info. I thought ABS was quite stable.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
|