![]() |
Linn Majik
In article ,
UnsteadyKen wrote: In article: Dave Plowman (News) says... I have other remotes which say they can copy from one. I was hoping the 350 would just work. Or have instructions on how to make it do so. Yep, the Logitech units look good at first sight, but the reliance on a PC for setup and the complexity does count against them. Why does everything work for others but not me? ;-) Join the club! I often look at all the remotes here and think it's getting out of hand, but consider the amount of buttons on them and the size of the boxes they control, moving the controls to the device itself would mean we'd be on our hands and knees with a toothpick, torch and magnifying glass trying to change channels:-( Did eventually discover how to programme the individual buttons. Just why they didn't do that initially, I dunno. They could have been changed afterwards, if not to taste. Still got a problem with the laptop, though, despite a re-install. So had to run up and down stairs for each button. ;-) -- *WOULD A FLY WITHOUT WINGS BE CALLED A WALK? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Silly question!
In article ,
Graeme Wall wrote: Then get an RIAA pre-amp. Vast range on Ebay from about 15 quid upwards. Record deck plugs into that, output into the line in on the computer. I assume the PC being a desktop has one? Unfortunately not! Hence looking at using USB to access the beast. (Apple iMac) Another good reason not to buy anything Apple, then. All of my Windows desktops and laptops have analogue line in and out. -- *Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Silly question!
In article ,
Java Jive wrote: If only it were that simple ... :-( Removing an earth may not cure the problem :-( Removing an earth may give the user really nasty static shocks due to the normal action of a stylus rubbing against vinyl. You get a static shock when touching a ground. Multiple ones - which cause hum - ain't going to make that worse. Everything will still be grounded via the audio screens. -- *IF A PARSLEY FARMER IS SUED, CAN THEY GARNISH HIS WAGES? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Linn Majik
In article ,
UnsteadyKen wrote: In article: Dave Plowman (News) says... I have other remotes which say they can copy from one. I was hoping the 350 would just work. Or have instructions on how to make it do so. Yep, the Logitech units look good at first sight, but the reliance on a PC for setup and the complexity does count against them. Why does everything work for others but not me? ;-) Join the club! I often look at all the remotes here and think it's getting out of hand, but consider the amount of buttons on them and the Wouldn't it be nice if they simply published the codes and how to add them for yourself. Oh, sorry, that means you wouldn't have to keep buying 'different' ones, I guess. Has't someone produced a 'learning' handset that does so by capturing the actual light output patterns? Perhaps also building up an open archive of the details for people to use? If not, maybe its time. Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Silly question!
In article , Graeme Wall
wrote: On 10/07/2015 12:27, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Graeme Wall wrote: But if you do have an existing record deck, that could surely be moved to the computer easily? It;s the bit between the deck and the computer which is the problem, ie the proper pre-amp. Then get an RIAA pre-amp. Vast range on Ebay from about 15 quid upwards. Record deck plugs into that, output into the line in on the computer. I assume the PC being a desktop has one? Unfortunately not! Hence looking at using USB to access the beast. (Apple iMac) Though I gather there are audio-in to USB adaptors available. Just that means yet another connector in the chain. The Behringer UFO202 might be worth trying as they are fairly cheap, and should 'just work' as they are Audio Class one. (i.e. work with a Mac without any 'drivers' nonsense). I've not tried one, but I did try (and have a) UCA202. I found the results shown at http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/HFN/ADC/USBrecording.html The units look similar, but of course I have no idea what the internals are like I found some UFO202 specs at http://www.americanmusical.com/Item--i-BEH-UFO202-LIST I have no idea how reliable those values are, but the device is probably about 25 quid, so may be the simplest and cheapest punt. Assuming you have an MM cartridge it will suit. May be good enough for old 45s unless they are in unusually good condition. Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Linn Majik
In article ,
Jim Lesurf wrote: Has't someone produced a 'learning' handset that does so by capturing the actual light output patterns? Perhaps also building up an open archive of the details for people to use? If not, maybe its time. Lots will do this if you have the original handset. But don't know of any which can do it from the appliance, if the original is lost. -- *Is there another word for synonym? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Silly question!
Not in the case of an unearthed amplifier powered by a two-core mains
lead. On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:53:58 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: You get a static shock when touching a ground. Multiple ones - which cause hum - ain't going to make that worse. Everything will still be grounded via the audio screens. -- ================================================== ====== Please always reply to ng as the email in this post's header does not exist. Or use a contact address at: http://www.macfh.co.uk/JavaJive/JavaJive.html http://www.macfh.co.uk/Macfarlane/Macfarlane.html |
Silly question!
On 10/07/2015 17:17, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , Graeme Wall wrote: On 10/07/2015 12:27, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Graeme Wall wrote: But if you do have an existing record deck, that could surely be moved to the computer easily? It;s the bit between the deck and the computer which is the problem, ie the proper pre-amp. Then get an RIAA pre-amp. Vast range on Ebay from about 15 quid upwards. Record deck plugs into that, output into the line in on the computer. I assume the PC being a desktop has one? Unfortunately not! Hence looking at using USB to access the beast. (Apple iMac) Though I gather there are audio-in to USB adaptors available. Just that means yet another connector in the chain. The Behringer UFO202 might be worth trying as they are fairly cheap, and should 'just work' as they are Audio Class one. (i.e. work with a Mac without any 'drivers' nonsense). I've not tried one, but I did try (and have a) UCA202. I found the results shown at http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/HFN/ADC/USBrecording.html The units look similar, but of course I have no idea what the internals are like I found some UFO202 specs at http://www.americanmusical.com/Item--i-BEH-UFO202-LIST That looks worth following up, thanks. I have no idea how reliable those values are, but the device is probably about 25 quid, so may be the simplest and cheapest punt. Assuming you have an MM cartridge it will suit. May be good enough for old 45s unless they are in unusually good condition. I used to copy my singles onto 1/4 inch tape and played back from that so they are not in bad condition. -- Graeme Wall This account not read, substitute trains for rail. |
Silly question!
On 10/07/2015 17:17, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , Graeme Wall wrote: On 10/07/2015 12:27, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Graeme Wall wrote: But if you do have an existing record deck, that could surely be moved to the computer easily? It;s the bit between the deck and the computer which is the problem, ie the proper pre-amp. Then get an RIAA pre-amp. Vast range on Ebay from about 15 quid upwards. Record deck plugs into that, output into the line in on the computer. I assume the PC being a desktop has one? Unfortunately not! Hence looking at using USB to access the beast. (Apple iMac) Though I gather there are audio-in to USB adaptors available. Just that means yet another connector in the chain. The Behringer UFO202 might be worth trying as they are fairly cheap, and should 'just work' as they are Audio Class one. (i.e. work with a Mac without any 'drivers' nonsense). Snipped for brevity I have a Behringer UFO202 and am very happy with it when used with my Dual 505 deck from Ebay and fitted with Shure M55E. As Jim says, it 'just works'. |
Silly question!
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:17:21 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote: The Behringer UFO202 might be worth trying as they are fairly cheap, and should 'just work' as they are Audio Class one. (i.e. work with a Mac without any 'drivers' nonsense). I've not tried one, but I did try (and have a) UCA202. I found the results shown at I have one which I bought as a means of bypassing burning CDs via my CD recorder. I found it to be far inferior in terms of sound quality and I have reverted to burning the CDs . FWIW, this one was only ~$30 (US) so I really didn't expect it be the same as a $5,000 ADC. Of course, you not need (or be able to afford) the very best (hey as you said-they're old singles), YMMV ------------------------------------------ My email is JohnMee3 AT comcast.net, not whatever is in the header |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk