![]() |
|
Linn Majik
Picked up a broken Linn Majik amp the other day, and soon got it fixed.
It has extremely basic controls on the front - so obviously is intended to have a remote control. Genuine Linn ones seem to fetch a fortune on Ebay. Anyone know which generic ones will work? -- *Stable Relationships Are For Horses. * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Linn Majik
On 02/07/15 16:54, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Picked up a broken Linn Majik amp the other day, and soon got it fixed. It has extremely basic controls on the front - so obviously is intended to have a remote control. Genuine Linn ones seem to fetch a fortune on Ebay. Anyone know which generic ones will work? One-For-All universal remote controls have a couple of device codes for the Linn Majik - 1089 and 1189. If you put the model number of one of their remotes into this page and search for Linn Majik you can confirm that a particular model of remote has the code built in: http://websupport.uebv.com/?lang=EN -- ╔═╦═╦═════╦═══╗ ║ ║ ║ ║ ║ ╔═╝ ║ ║ ║ ║ ║ ╔═╝ ╚═══╩═╩═╩═╩═╩═╝ -- JimP. |
Linn Majik
On 02/07/2015 16:54, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Picked up a broken Linn Majik amp the other day, and soon got it fixed. It has extremely basic controls on the front - so obviously is intended to have a remote control. Genuine Linn ones seem to fetch a fortune on Ebay. Anyone know which generic ones will work? The Logitech database features three entries for Linn Majik; Majik-I, Majik DS and Majik DS-I. Therefore any Harmony remote would work, if one of these designations matches that of the amp. |
Linn Majik
On 3/07/2015 1:54 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Picked up a broken Linn Majik amp the other day, and soon got it fixed. It has extremely basic controls on the front - so obviously is intended to have a remote control. Genuine Linn ones seem to fetch a fortune on Ebay. Anyone know which generic ones will work? **Agreed with the Logitech Harmony approach. Best thing for those odd-ball devices. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Linn Majik
In article ,
Trevor Wilson wrote: On 3/07/2015 1:54 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Picked up a broken Linn Majik amp the other day, and soon got it fixed. It has extremely basic controls on the front - so obviously is intended to have a remote control. Genuine Linn ones seem to fetch a fortune on Ebay. Anyone know which generic ones will work? **Agreed with the Logitech Harmony approach. Best thing for those odd-ball devices. Thing is they cost more than a genuine Linn one. ;-) -- *Age is a very high price to pay for maturity. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Linn Majik
On 7/3/15 4:56 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: On 3/07/2015 1:54 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Picked up a broken Linn Majik amp the other day, and soon got it fixed. It has extremely basic controls on the front - so obviously is intended to have a remote control. Genuine Linn ones seem to fetch a fortune on Ebay. Anyone know which generic ones will work? **Agreed with the Logitech Harmony approach. Best thing for those odd-ball devices. Thing is they cost more than a genuine Linn one. ;-) My Arcam remote works on my Linn Majik. Stephen |
Linn Majik
In article ,
MiNe109 wrote: On 7/3/15 4:56 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: On 3/07/2015 1:54 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Picked up a broken Linn Majik amp the other day, and soon got it fixed. It has extremely basic controls on the front - so obviously is intended to have a remote control. Genuine Linn ones seem to fetch a fortune on Ebay. Anyone know which generic ones will work? **Agreed with the Logitech Harmony approach. Best thing for those odd-ball devices. Thing is they cost more than a genuine Linn one. ;-) My Arcam remote works on my Linn Majik. All I've really found is it is one of the Philips protocols, if that's the correct name. -- *Most people have more than the average number of legs* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Linn Majik
On 3/07/2015 7:56 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: On 3/07/2015 1:54 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Picked up a broken Linn Majik amp the other day, and soon got it fixed. It has extremely basic controls on the front - so obviously is intended to have a remote control. Genuine Linn ones seem to fetch a fortune on Ebay. Anyone know which generic ones will work? **Agreed with the Logitech Harmony approach. Best thing for those odd-ball devices. Thing is they cost more than a genuine Linn one. ;-) **They're less than 40 Bucks (20 Squid) over here. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Linn Majik
In article ,
Trevor Wilson wrote: On 3/07/2015 7:56 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: On 3/07/2015 1:54 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Picked up a broken Linn Majik amp the other day, and soon got it fixed. It has extremely basic controls on the front - so obviously is intended to have a remote control. Genuine Linn ones seem to fetch a fortune on Ebay. Anyone know which generic ones will work? **Agreed with the Logitech Harmony approach. Best thing for those odd-ball devices. Thing is they cost more than a genuine Linn one. ;-) **They're less than 40 Bucks (20 Squid) over here. Which one? There seem to be lots of different ones with the same name - and up to about 150 quid. -- *Remember not to forget that which you do not need to know.* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Linn Majik
On 4/07/2015 9:15 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: On 3/07/2015 7:56 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: On 3/07/2015 1:54 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Picked up a broken Linn Majik amp the other day, and soon got it fixed. It has extremely basic controls on the front - so obviously is intended to have a remote control. Genuine Linn ones seem to fetch a fortune on Ebay. Anyone know which generic ones will work? **Agreed with the Logitech Harmony approach. Best thing for those odd-ball devices. Thing is they cost more than a genuine Linn one. ;-) **They're less than 40 Bucks (20 Squid) over here. Which one? There seem to be lots of different ones with the same name - and up to about 150 quid. **The cheapest one, of course. I rather like the nice, colour screen models, which are sometimes on special for less than 100 Bucks. Nonetheless, I've used this one: http://www.dicksmith.com.au/tv-video...ol-dsau-cn3609 On special, I've seen them for around 30 Bucks. I no longer bother with 'no-name' remotes, as the Logitech stuff works so nicely. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Linn Majik
How can you copy the codes if you do not have the original remote though?
Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... On 4/07/2015 9:15 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: On 3/07/2015 7:56 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: On 3/07/2015 1:54 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Picked up a broken Linn Majik amp the other day, and soon got it fixed. It has extremely basic controls on the front - so obviously is intended to have a remote control. Genuine Linn ones seem to fetch a fortune on Ebay. Anyone know which generic ones will work? **Agreed with the Logitech Harmony approach. Best thing for those odd-ball devices. Thing is they cost more than a genuine Linn one. ;-) **They're less than 40 Bucks (20 Squid) over here. Which one? There seem to be lots of different ones with the same name - and up to about 150 quid. **The cheapest one, of course. I rather like the nice, colour screen models, which are sometimes on special for less than 100 Bucks. Nonetheless, I've used this one: http://www.dicksmith.com.au/tv-video...ol-dsau-cn3609 On special, I've seen them for around 30 Bucks. I no longer bother with 'no-name' remotes, as the Logitech stuff works so nicely. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Linn Majik
In article ,
Trevor Wilson wrote: Which one? There seem to be lots of different ones with the same name - and up to about 150 quid. **The cheapest one, of course. I rather like the nice, colour screen models, which are sometimes on special for less than 100 Bucks. Nonetheless, I've used this one: http://www.dicksmith.com.au/tv-video...ol-dsau-cn3609 On special, I've seen them for around 30 Bucks. I no longer bother with 'no-name' remotes, as the Logitech stuff works so nicely. The 350 appears to be about 50 here. Which is more than a good used Linn remote goes for on Ebay. They tend to make about 30. If I could be sure it would work properly, might be worth not having to wait for a used Linn at the right price. Not actually a lover of Logitech. Had one of their wireless keyboards and mouse - both with a so called lifetime warranty. Both were looking very scruffy after a short time - the letters on the keyboard keys worn off on the most used keys. They said this just fair wear and tear. -- *Why is the word abbreviation so long? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Linn Majik
In article ,
Brian-Gaff wrote: How can you copy the codes if you do not have the original remote though? They give you a list of the control codes protocol numbers by maker. Thousands of them. You enter the correct four digit code via the handset, and it should then work. Assuming they have the correct 4 digit code, of course. Which I doubt they'd have for a Linn. ;-) -- *Some days you're the dog, some days the hydrant. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Linn Majik
On 4/07/2015 8:06 PM, Brian-Gaff wrote:
How can you copy the codes if you do not have the original remote though? Brian **That's not how the Logitech remotes work. There's a little USB socket in the top (or bottom) of the remotes. Plug a lead from the remote into a computer, go on-line and move through the process on the screen to program your remote. The system allows for easy macro set-ups and has error checking built-in. When I set them up for clients, I suggest that if changes are made, they should consult with a 12 year old, who can usually manage the process easily and painlessly. It's way overkill for setting up a single remote, but the cost is so low (here in Oz) that it is a no-brainer. If you guys are being stung to the tune of 50 Squid for one of their remotes, it may be better to go on-line and find one. Or, perhaps, complain to the regulatory people who deal with pricing. Clearly, Poms are being ripped off. OTOH, here is what I found this morning: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Logitech-H...em2c9ce3 77d0 A beaut remote. Very powerful. This will do the job: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Logitech-H...em3aad4d b7a9 WAY better than 50 Squid (cheaper than in Oz): http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Logitech-H...em5420a8 8629 Do I have to come over and teach you guys how to use the internet? -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Linn Majik
On 4/07/2015 8:18 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: Which one? There seem to be lots of different ones with the same name - and up to about 150 quid. **The cheapest one, of course. I rather like the nice, colour screen models, which are sometimes on special for less than 100 Bucks. Nonetheless, I've used this one: http://www.dicksmith.com.au/tv-video...ol-dsau-cn3609 On special, I've seen them for around 30 Bucks. I no longer bother with 'no-name' remotes, as the Logitech stuff works so nicely. The 350 appears to be about 50 here. Which is more than a good used Linn remote goes for on Ebay. They tend to make about 30. **Here's what I found after about 3 minutes of searching: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Logitech-H...em5420a8 8629 http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Logitech-H...em3aad4d b7a9 Personally, I'd buy one of these and control ALL your equipment, plus a few of your neighbours' as well: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Logitech-H...em2c9ce3 77d0 If I could be sure it would work properly, might be worth not having to wait for a used Linn at the right price. **Check out the Logitech site. They're quite helpful. Not actually a lover of Logitech. Had one of their wireless keyboards and mouse - both with a so called lifetime warranty. Both were looking very scruffy after a short time - the letters on the keyboard keys worn off on the most used keys. They said this just fair wear and tear. **Fair enough. I'm typing on a Logitech keyboard now (and matching RF mouse). Several letters have worn off, but the damned thing still works fine (as does the mouse). Mind you, my old IBM PS/2 keyboard was designed to survive a nuclear holocaust. I used to hammed the crap out of it, back in the 1980s when I played a lot of games. Damned thing still works flawlessly. But, realistically, no one can afford to build keyboards like that anymore. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Linn Majik
On 4/07/2015 10:32 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Brian-Gaff wrote: How can you copy the codes if you do not have the original remote though? They give you a list of the control codes protocol numbers by maker. Thousands of them. You enter the correct four digit code via the handset, and it should then work. Assuming they have the correct 4 digit code, of course. Which I doubt they'd have for a Linn. ;-) **No, that is not how the Logitech systems works at all. You programme the remote via a USB cable connected to your computer. You go on-line and tell the Logitech people what you have (brand, model number, etc) and it feeds the codes direct to your remote. You then go and test the remote with your appliance. If it doesn't work, you plug it back in and tell Logitech what doesn't work, whereupon it will continue searching for the correct codes. I betcha it has the codes for your Linn. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Linn Majik
In article , Trevor Wilson
wrote: On 4/07/2015 10:32 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Brian-Gaff wrote: How can you copy the codes if you do not have the original remote though? They give you a list of the control codes protocol numbers by maker. Thousands of them. You enter the correct four digit code via the handset, and it should then work. Assuming they have the correct 4 digit code, of course. Which I doubt they'd have for a Linn. ;-) **No, that is not how the Logitech systems works at all. You programme the remote via a USB cable connected to your computer. You go on-line and tell the Logitech people what you have (brand, model number, etc) and it feeds the codes direct to your remote. So you have to let someone else run software on your machine? Or do they 'simply' let you fetch an executable you have to run blind? Or do they provide a data file and a simple explanation of how to get it into the remote by some standard method like telnet, ftp, etc? That raises all kinds of questions like: How do you know the execution doesn't introduce some form of malware, etc, into the host machine you use? Does it require you to have bought and use a closed-source OS from an foreign (i.e. non-UK, non-EU) company beyond the jurisdiction of your local law? Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Linn Majik
In article ,
Trevor Wilson wrote: On 4/07/2015 10:32 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Brian-Gaff wrote: How can you copy the codes if you do not have the original remote though? They give you a list of the control codes protocol numbers by maker. Thousands of them. You enter the correct four digit code via the handset, and it should then work. Assuming they have the correct 4 digit code, of course. Which I doubt they'd have for a Linn. ;-) **No, that is not how the Logitech systems works at all. You programme the remote via a USB cable connected to your computer. You go on-line and tell the Logitech people what you have (brand, model number, etc) and it feeds the codes direct to your remote. You then go and test the remote with your appliance. If it doesn't work, you plug it back in and tell Logitech what doesn't work, whereupon it will continue searching for the correct codes. I betcha it has the codes for your Linn. Thanks, Trevor. Looks like the way forward. -- *I used up all my sick days so I called in dead Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Linn Majik
On 5/07/2015 6:33 PM, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: On 4/07/2015 10:32 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Brian-Gaff wrote: How can you copy the codes if you do not have the original remote though? They give you a list of the control codes protocol numbers by maker. Thousands of them. You enter the correct four digit code via the handset, and it should then work. Assuming they have the correct 4 digit code, of course. Which I doubt they'd have for a Linn. ;-) **No, that is not how the Logitech systems works at all. You programme the remote via a USB cable connected to your computer. You go on-line and tell the Logitech people what you have (brand, model number, etc) and it feeds the codes direct to your remote. So you have to let someone else run software on your machine? Or do they 'simply' let you fetch an executable you have to run blind? Or do they provide a data file and a simple explanation of how to get it into the remote by some standard method like telnet, ftp, etc? That raises all kinds of questions like: How do you know the execution doesn't introduce some form of malware, etc, into the host machine you use? Does it require you to have bought and use a closed-source OS from an foreign (i.e. non-UK, non-EU) company beyond the jurisdiction of your local law? **I missed your smiley. You are kidding, right? It's a remote control. You download the codes to allow the remote to function with specific appliances. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Linn Majik
In article , Trevor Wilson
wrote: On 5/07/2015 6:33 PM, Jim Lesurf wrote: In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: On 4/07/2015 10:32 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Brian-Gaff wrote: How can you copy the codes if you do not have the original remote though? They give you a list of the control codes protocol numbers by maker. Thousands of them. You enter the correct four digit code via the handset, and it should then work. Assuming they have the correct 4 digit code, of course. Which I doubt they'd have for a Linn. ;-) **No, that is not how the Logitech systems works at all. You programme the remote via a USB cable connected to your computer. You go on-line and tell the Logitech people what you have (brand, model number, etc) and it feeds the codes direct to your remote. So you have to let someone else run software on your machine? Or do they 'simply' let you fetch an executable you have to run blind? Or do they provide a data file and a simple explanation of how to get it into the remote by some standard method like telnet, ftp, etc? That raises all kinds of questions like: How do you know the execution doesn't introduce some form of malware, etc, into the host machine you use? Does it require you to have bought and use a closed-source OS from an foreign (i.e. non-UK, non-EU) company beyond the jurisdiction of your local law? **I missed your smiley. You are kidding, right? Nope. I read your "You go online...", "via USB cable", and "...it feeds the code direct to your remote". To me that seems to imply fetching and running an executable. Hence my questions to clarify precisely what is going on. Did you mean "they give you a code string to type into the remote"? It's a remote control. You download the codes to allow the remote to function with specific appliances. That doesn't clarify what I'm asking about *how* this is done, or if it can be done using any OS, etc. Note that "any OS" isn't a synonym for "Windows or Mac". :-) Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Linn Majik
On 6/07/2015 7:00 PM, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: On 5/07/2015 6:33 PM, Jim Lesurf wrote: In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: On 4/07/2015 10:32 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Brian-Gaff wrote: How can you copy the codes if you do not have the original remote though? They give you a list of the control codes protocol numbers by maker. Thousands of them. You enter the correct four digit code via the handset, and it should then work. Assuming they have the correct 4 digit code, of course. Which I doubt they'd have for a Linn. ;-) **No, that is not how the Logitech systems works at all. You programme the remote via a USB cable connected to your computer. You go on-line and tell the Logitech people what you have (brand, model number, etc) and it feeds the codes direct to your remote. So you have to let someone else run software on your machine? Or do they 'simply' let you fetch an executable you have to run blind? Or do they provide a data file and a simple explanation of how to get it into the remote by some standard method like telnet, ftp, etc? That raises all kinds of questions like: How do you know the execution doesn't introduce some form of malware, etc, into the host machine you use? Does it require you to have bought and use a closed-source OS from an foreign (i.e. non-UK, non-EU) company beyond the jurisdiction of your local law? **I missed your smiley. You are kidding, right? Nope. I read your "You go online...", "via USB cable", and "...it feeds the code direct to your remote". To me that seems to imply fetching and running an executable. Hence my questions to clarify precisely what is going on. Did you mean "they give you a code string to type into the remote"? **No. The remote is programmed directly with the codes via the USB connection. It's a remote control. You download the codes to allow the remote to function with specific appliances. That doesn't clarify what I'm asking about *how* this is done, or if it can be done using any OS, etc. Note that "any OS" isn't a synonym for "Windows or Mac". :-) **I suspect you over-estimate the intelligence inside the remote control. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Linn Majik
I've found an instruction booklet for this amp online, and it says:-
RC5 Amplifier address. 0=16 1=19 Leave at 16 for handset. Not quite sure what this refers to given most of the codes seem to be 4 digit ones? I have a few other remotes some of which claim to be programmable to control extra devices. But finding the instructions may take some time. ;-) A Philips one for a VCR operates the volume control, but nothing else. If I could find one which does volume and mute and channel I'd probably settle for that - before lashing out for an expensive one. -- *When cheese gets its picture taken, what does it say? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Linn Majik
On 06/07/15 15:47, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
I've found an instruction booklet for this amp online, and it says:- RC5 Amplifier address. 0=16 1=19 Leave at 16 for handset. Not quite sure what this refers to given most of the codes seem to be 4 digit ones? Those are the two bytes of the address in the RC5 bit stream. It is highly unlikely that will have any relation to the code from a universal remote manufacturer. I have a few other remotes some of which claim to be programmable to control extra devices. But finding the instructions may take some time. ;-) A Philips one for a VCR operates the volume control, but nothing else. If I could find one which does volume and mute and channel I'd probably settle for that - before lashing out for an expensive one. The better One-For-All ones allow you to re-program the keys to send specific codes. There are usually only a maximum of 256 key codes (as opposed to device codes), so once you have a working volume button you either need to try up to 255 of the possibilities, or contact them for support (if they still do that). If you have a One-For-All manual, programming of additional codes is covered in the section called "Key Magic". Just trying and individual code before you program it is done by pressing the magic key followed by the number of the code you want to try. Don't be put off if your manual doesn't have the "Key Magic" section - sometimes it's there despite not being in the documentation. -- ╔═╦═╦═════╦═══╗ ║ ║ ║ ║ ║ ╔═╝ ║ ║ ║ ║ ║ ╔═╝ ╚═══╩═╩═╩═╩═╩═╝ -- JimP. |
Linn Majik
On 06/07/2015 10:42, Trevor Wilson wrote:
**No. The remote is programmed directly with the codes via the USB connection. Trevor, it isn't. USB will connect your computer to the remote. You then need something on the computer which will send the right sequence of bytes down the USB. USB will tell you how to send the bytes, but not what they are. You're running Windows 7 on a 64-bit Intel processor. You've installed a program to program the remote, even if you don't know it. Andy |
Linn Majik
You're running Windows 7 on a 64-bit Intel processor. You've installed a program to program the remote, even if you don't know it. Andy It might well be written in JavaScript. The same program could then run in Mac/Windows/Linux etc. so long as a JavaScript enabled browser was installed. |
Linn Majik
In article , Sumatriptan
wrote: You're running Windows 7 on a 64-bit Intel processor. You've installed a program to program the remote, even if you don't know it. Andy It might well be written in JavaScript. The same program could then run in Mac/Windows/Linux etc. so long as a JavaScript enabled browser was installed. If its 'pure' JavaScript then OTOH it means it will essentially be source code, so could be checked. OTOH it may mean its a dialect that not all browsers can correctly run - or have permission to access the relevant hardware. The term 'JavaScript' can be used to cover at least three different but vaguely similar scripting languages, each of which probably have variations introduced over the years. As I recall, there was JavaScript, JScript, and something like ECMAScript (or whatever the acronym) all competing to be the scripting language. Or has that all long been resolved? I've not bothered with it for many years. If you mean 'Java' that's a different bag of nails. So that might be a step forward, but doesn't actually resolve all the potential issues I asked about. I can see that the makers may not want to have to explain things to users like how to run, say, telnet, and download a sequence. But something like this must be happening. Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Linn Majik
I can see that the makers may not want to have to explain things to users like how to run, say, telnet, and download a sequence. But something like this must be happening. I went to the Logitech Harmony remote setup page and immediately found an invitation to download and install 'MyHarmony desktop software' for Windows XP SP3 and/or Mac 10.6. followed by the usual disclaimers page. So 'something' definitely happens. |
Linn Majik
In article: Sumatriptan says... I went to the Logitech Harmony remote setup page and immediately found an invitation to download and install 'MyHarmony desktop software' for Windows XP SP3 and/or Mac 10.6. followed by the usual disclaimers page. So 'something' definitely happens. I should hope it does, the remote would be pretty useless without it! A couple of days ago when Jim posted his concerns about trusting the software and the possibility of malware being introduced, I downloaded and installed the MyHarmony software on this laptop. .. The download, a 400KB executable named MyHarmony-App.exe was checked with Microsoft Security Essentials anti virus and uploaded to https://www.virustotal.com/ for an on-line scan, both reported nothing found. I then looked inside the file using Resource Hacker http://www.angusj.com/resourcehacker/ and HexEdit http://www.hexedit.com/ and couldn't see anything out of the ordinary. I started up Nirsoft DNS sniffer http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/dns_query_sniffer.html and currports. http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/cports.html also running (as always) were WinPatrol, WinPrivacy and Comodo programs manager. I then started the MyHarmony-app which connected to app.myharmony.com and downloaded and ran what appears to be a front end to a web based app which allows one to create a Harmony account and "Set up your harmony" I created an account, then logged out of it. I then uninstalled the MyHarmony thing using the standard Windows method and it uninstalled cleanly leaving no leftover files, folders or registry entries. The whole process was painless and I thought it a well behaved app which did nothing naughty. I then forgot to post the results till I read this follow up, (Try and avoid having a stroke, the loss of short term memory is very hard to cope with:-() so I went through the whole rigmarole again just now with the same results. I must say I'm impressed with the Harmony remote, I have a a couple of One For All universals which are good but limited in the number of items that can be controlled, so I may look into it further when/if my latest ebay buy arrives from Shenzen http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/131465808261 -- Ken O'Meara List of UK hi-fi & audio dealers: http://unsteadyken.esy.es/ |
Linn Majik
On 07/07/2015 19:02, UnsteadyKen wrote:
The whole process was painless and I thought it a well behaved app which did nothing naughty. That all seems very sensible. If everyone were as careful as you then malware would cease to be much of an issue. I was just agreeing with Jim that some sort of software had to run on the PC to download the required remote codes from a website and send them via USB to the remote controller itself. And now you have confirmed that. |
Linn Majik
On 07/07/2015 19:02, UnsteadyKen wrote:
In article: Sumatriptan says... I went to the Logitech Harmony remote setup page and immediately found an invitation to download and install 'MyHarmony desktop software' for Windows XP SP3 and/or Mac 10.6. followed by the usual disclaimers page. So 'something' definitely happens. I should hope it does, the remote would be pretty useless without it! A couple of days ago when Jim posted his concerns about trusting the software and the possibility of malware being introduced, I downloaded and installed the MyHarmony software on this laptop. Despite the concerns? ;-) I decided to live a little too, and resurrected a Harmony 525 I hadn't used for at least 10 years. The software for this remote, an older version of MyHarmony, wouldn't run on W8.1, but the Mac version did once a Java variant was added. It obviously uses a current database, as it picked up reasonably new TV/amp/BR kit, and seems to work very well. Might well go back to using it. To the OP - the return for 'Linn Majik' is 'Linn Amplifier 2 (Majik)'. The download, a 400KB executable named MyHarmony-App.exe was checked with Microsoft Security Essentials anti virus and uploaded to https://www.virustotal.com/ for an on-line scan, both reported nothing found. I then looked inside the file using Resource Hacker http://www.angusj.com/resourcehacker/ and HexEdit http://www.hexedit.com/ and couldn't see anything out of the ordinary. I started up Nirsoft DNS sniffer http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/dns_query_sniffer.html and currports. http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/cports.html also running (as always) were WinPatrol, WinPrivacy and Comodo programs manager. I then started the MyHarmony-app which connected to app.myharmony.com and downloaded and ran what appears to be a front end to a web based app which allows one to create a Harmony account and "Set up your harmony" I created an account, then logged out of it. I then uninstalled the MyHarmony thing using the standard Windows method and it uninstalled cleanly leaving no leftover files, folders or registry entries. The whole process was painless and I thought it a well behaved app which did nothing naughty. I then forgot to post the results till I read this follow up, (Try and avoid having a stroke, the loss of short term memory is very hard to cope with:-() so I went through the whole rigmarole again just now with the same results. Good grief! Nice of you to be so thorough, but I'd suggest the concerns expressed by Jim are (erm) remote. If people remain worried they can always get a Mac :-) All the best with the stroke recovery by the way. 3 or 4 quite close friends have been hit over the years. One couldn't use proper nouns for about 6 months - he'd substitute people's names with random words for example. Happy to report that all are back to full health. I must say I'm impressed with the Harmony remote, I have a a couple of One For All universals which are good but limited in the number of items that can be controlled, so I may look into it further when/if my latest ebay buy arrives from Shenzen http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/131465808261 Yes, they are good once you get used to the 'Activities' mode (control multiple devices from one set of keys). I doubt the splitter (clever looking thing!) you've bought is in the database but it can always 'learn'. The software is to say the least an acquired taste, but gets there in the end. -- Cheers, Rob |
Linn Majik
In article , RJH
wrote: Good grief! Nice of you to be so thorough, but I'd suggest the concerns expressed by Jim are (erm) remote. If people remain worried they can always get a Mac :-) Actually, currently the omission in what people are saying that seems most obvious to me is the matter of OS choice. It is apparently taken for granted that everyone must use Windows or Macs. How would I (or anyone else) do this *without* having to run a commercial non-UK OS? I've seen mentions of Windows and Macs, but not Linux or other OSs. Is this another example where large companies take for granted that you have to give money (and control over your OS) to Microsoft or Apple? Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Linn Majik
An update. Borrowed a Linn remote from a pal, and that works just fine.
But none on Ebay. Found a Philips remote lying around (I don't chuck that sort of thing out ;-) ) which operated the volume and mute. But nothing else. So after all the positive comments on here bought a Harmony 350. Downloaded the software to the laptop and kept getting an error message at the finish - something about not being able to find the software updater and told me to log in again. Which I did several times, but still the same message. And it was obvious the remote hadn't been programmed as the device button is meant to light when you press a key. So went through the entire process again on the desktop. Deleted the Linn from it and started from fresh. This time everything seemed to go to plan. Pressing the volume rocker button made the device button light up. And the remote now works. It operates the volume and mute - but nothing else. ;-( It accepted Linn and Majik when programming, so I was perhaps naive to assume it knew the device. The instruction book may be a thick tomb but only contains a couple of pages of instructions - the others just being other languages. And their website the usual mess. But I'll try and go through it later. -- *Hard work has a future payoff. Laziness pays off NOW. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Silly question!
In article ,
Graeme Wall wrote: But if you do have an existing record deck, that could surely be moved to the computer easily? It;s the bit between the deck and the computer which is the problem, ie the proper pre-amp. Then get an RIAA pre-amp. Vast range on Ebay from about 15 quid upwards. Record deck plugs into that, output into the line in on the computer. I assume the PC being a desktop has one? You might also need to buy the correct output lead from the pre-amp to PC input. -- *Constipated People Don't Give A Crap* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Linn Majik
In article: Dave Plowman (News) says... And their website the usual mess. But I'll try and go through it later. If you can borrow that original remote again then you can add the missing functions. https://support.myharmony.com/en/tea...issing-command -- Ken O'Meara List of UK hi-fi & audio dealers: http://unsteadyken.esy.es/ |
Silly question!
The problem is that many of the mains-powered ones introduce
appreciable hum. On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:27:58 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: Then get an RIAA pre-amp. Vast range on Ebay from about 15 quid upwards. -- ================================================== ====== Please always reply to ng as the email in this post's header does not exist. Or use a contact address at: http://www.macfh.co.uk/JavaJive/JavaJive.html http://www.macfh.co.uk/Macfarlane/Macfarlane.html |
Linn Majik
In article ,
UnsteadyKen wrote: In article: Dave Plowman (News) says... And their website the usual mess. But I'll try and go through it later. If you can borrow that original remote again then you can add the missing functions. https://support.myharmony.com/en/tea...issing-command Sadly, that's going to be a pain as it belongs to a pal who was visiting London. Dunno when he will be again. I have other remotes which say they can copy from one. I was hoping the 350 would just work. Or have instructions on how to make it do so. Why does everything work for others but not me? ;-) Been on to their website, and had to register again to get access to help - and it looks like a forum or whatever so pot luck that someone has had the same problem - it doesn't come up with anything in a search. Nor can I find a proper manual. Perhaps no one can read these days. -- *Why do psychics have to ask you for your name? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Silly question!
In article ,
Java Jive wrote: The problem is that many of the mains-powered ones introduce appreciable hum. Remove an earth, then. On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:27:58 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: Then get an RIAA pre-amp. Vast range on Ebay from about 15 quid upwards. -- *Why do we say something is out of whack? What is a whack? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Silly question!
If only it were that simple ...
:-( Removing an earth may not cure the problem :-( Removing an earth may give the user really nasty static shocks due to the normal action of a stylus rubbing against vinyl. On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:48:29 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: Remove an earth, then. -- ================================================== ====== Please always reply to ng as the email in this post's header does not exist. Or use a contact address at: http://www.macfh.co.uk/JavaJive/JavaJive.html http://www.macfh.co.uk/Macfarlane/Macfarlane.html |
Linn Majik
In article: Dave Plowman (News) says... I have other remotes which say they can copy from one. I was hoping the 350 would just work. Or have instructions on how to make it do so. Yep, the Logitech units look good at first sight, but the reliance on a PC for setup and the complexity does count against them. Why does everything work for others but not me? ;-) Join the club! I often look at all the remotes here and think it's getting out of hand, but consider the amount of buttons on them and the size of the boxes they control, moving the controls to the device itself would mean we'd be on our hands and knees with a toothpick, torch and magnifying glass trying to change channels:-( -- Ken O'Meara List of UK hi-fi & audio dealers: http://unsteadyken.esy.es/ |
Silly question!
On 10/07/2015 12:27, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Graeme Wall wrote: But if you do have an existing record deck, that could surely be moved to the computer easily? It;s the bit between the deck and the computer which is the problem, ie the proper pre-amp. Then get an RIAA pre-amp. Vast range on Ebay from about 15 quid upwards. Record deck plugs into that, output into the line in on the computer. I assume the PC being a desktop has one? Unfortunately not! Hence looking at using USB to access the beast. (Apple iMac) Though I gather there are audio-in to USB adaptors available. Just that means yet another connector in the chain. You might also need to buy the correct output lead from the pre-amp to PC input. -- Graeme Wall This account not read, substitute trains for rail. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:22 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright 2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk