On 14/12/2015 4:19 AM, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article , Eiron
wrote:
The LS3/5A is/was the most over-rated speaker of all time. Muddy,
poor imaging and just plain average.
Here's another secret: your secret never was a secret.
If Stuart was still here he would tell us that the image from a
bextrene cone collapses at low levels.
The main thing about the LS3/5a was the quality control. They all
sounded the same, if equally mediocre.
Right - so you're saying there are better similar speakers around - but
they don't all sound the same? ;-)
For broadcasting use consistency of the monitor speakers is important.
And that's what they were designed for.
FWIW I quite like both the LS3/5A and the current Stirling 'near
equivalent'. But I tend to prefer the 'BBC' sound, and use them with an amp
that has ye olde tone controls.
**This is where you and I differ in our preferences. I have no used tone
controls in almost 40 years and regard the LS3/5A as nothing more than a
doorstop.
And given the space, etc, prefer ESLs. :-)
**And here is where it gets weird. A pair of stacked ESL57s or a nice
pair of ESL63s is something I can live with. Easily.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus