A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Audio over wifi


« Push vs pull | test »

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old July 12th 16, 02:18 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,668
Default Audio over wifi

In article ,
Richard
Robinson wrote:
Jim Lesurf said:


Having now had another reread of The Manual, I think what I was missing
is that it talks about "Digital inputs" (S/PDIF, TOSlink) and "USB in"
in separate sections. So it doesn't regard USB as digital info, it
expects the raw bytestream ?


They are all examples of byte streams. But the way the operate is
different. The spdif / toslink have the 'sender' just send the bytes or
bits without any awareness of what might be at the 'receiving' end of the
cable.

The USB connection 'negotiates' back and forth to 'handshake' the exchanges
as a series of batches of data. Various methods are used for this, some
better than others.


I also toggled the DAC into Class 2 Audio mode, with no discernible
effect on the bitrate LED (there may be more to do here wrt s/w support,
and maybe cabling).


Class 2 may be 4 bytes per sample whilst Class 1 may just use 3. The
differences are in the protocols and methods for the 'negotiations' etc.



But this is currently a hardware issue - the only mic I can find is an
old AKG dynamic, which isn't what the headphone/mic socket on a laptop
likes; v. low signal, hideously infeasible hiss (I used to have a more
suitable one, but idiotically I put it away with a battery in and now
the contacts are corroded. I'm a fool). Yes, USB would probably be the
way to go; the friend I'm doing the recording with has offered to lend
me an "interface"; from which I expect to learn /something/.


FWIW if you don't need the ultimate in quality I tend to suggest the
Scarlett 2i2 for making audio recordings. You can find info on it on my
website. I use it when I need to make recordings with a laptop. Note,
though, that it benefits from a 'quiet' power supply via USB. And will
drain the batteries of a laptop if used for very long. So for use with a Pi
you may find it needs to be powered via an added external hub.

That said, I've only used its 'line' inputs. But I've read good comments
about it from others.

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

 



« Push vs pull | test »

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.