On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 01:23:05 +0000, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Graeme Wall wrote:
On 25/11/2016 15:27, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Jim Lesurf wrote:
I've been working though a folder of old Ferrograph documents,
scanning them to put onto the ukhhsoc website. I came across a
circuit diagram that doesn't look to me like it is of any Ferrograph
item. Presumably mis-filed at some ancient time.
I have put a copy at
http://jcgl.orpheusweb.co.uk/temp/Unknown.jpeg (about 3MB file)
Can anyone recogise this and say what it is?
Did Ferrograph ever use DIN connectors? Also can't say I can remember
ever seeing a 5 pin DIN used as a headphone socket. Sounds like
something Grundig would do. ;-)
I remember my Dad had a Grundig TK40 and that used 5 pin DINs for all
the connectors.
DIN connectors were pretty common on most German stuff at one time. Odd
given the German reputation (and rightly so) for engineering things
well. Spawn of satan, DIN connectors. ;-)
Yes they were! They may have gained some kudos if they'd thought to
insist that pins 1 (and 4) were *only* ever designated as inputs and pins
3 (and 5) *only* as outputs so that the only legitimate 5 or 3 pin DIN
connecting cables were wired as cross-over types but they overlooked this
opportunity to enforce a commonsense standard that would have curtailed
the profiteering opportunities in the interconnect marketplace, a feature
that would have endeared this interconnect standard to the "Hi-Fi buying
Public".
The only advantage of the constant current sources into virtual earth
sinks system was the ease with which you can mix the outputs from several
sources into one virtual earth sink (and the capability to bridge stereo
pairs to downmix to mono without inducing distortion in the source
amplifiers), otherwise (discounting the stereo into mono feature) it
makes more sense to use constant voltage sources feeding mid to high Z
sinks as is more typically the case with the phono plug and socket
alternative.
--
Johnny B Good