![]() |
Current trends in audio
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 02:30:47 -0800 (PST), Phil Allison
wrote: Johan Helsingius wrote: I once did a blind listening test on an audiophile forum to see if people could hear a difference between "hi-res" and CD. As an outlier test, I threw in a 256K mp3 file (decoded to FLAC, so people couldn't tell from the file format what it was). The mp3 file came out as the second most preferred of all 9 alternatives - the "winner" was the 16/44.1 file that I had increased the volume by 1 dB on... :) ** That is a really worthless test methodology. About 3 decades ago, I came up with a simple and really powerful one that avoided the horrible problems inherent in all A then B or ABX type tests. Ocne set up, the test takes only a few seconds before the result is clear and convincing. Unless your test operates in a similar way, it has no credibility with or impact on any listener. The principle is that of INSTANT change-over, while listening in stereo, in your home to your best loved tracks. Read about it he http://sound.whsites.net/absw.htm Got any questions - I'm right here, every day. .... Phil I find instant switchover causes problems, particularly in the bass end. If the two systems happen to have opposite phase, there will be an apparent sound change when switching over, even though the sound is actually the same. I like to have about half a second of dead air to wipe the phase memory. That way you only hear the actual differences, not the artificial transient of the phase shift. d |
Current trends in audio
On 22-01-17 11:30, Phil Allison wrote:
** That is a really worthless test methodology. True, but still better than sighted listening. The principle is that of INSTANT change-over, while listening in stereo, in your home to your best loved tracks. Yes, an A/B switchbox is great - if you have two separate audio chains to compare. For comparing two different source files, you need player software that can do the same in software. Foobar2000 has an ABX function for comparing music files that allows you similar instant switching between the two sound files. Julf |
Current trends in audio
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:06:25 -0000, "Brian Gaff"
wrote: This though edges on the psycho acoustic issues as well as the compression and other distortions issues. In many cases, I cannot tell tthe difference between a home made cd of a vinyl and the real one. The only time it notices is if you go overboard with click suppression or rumbe and other noise reduction as on dying echoes you hear the watermark effect or the little blips in level where the click used to be. However some of the early recordings I made when DAB was still relatively new sound much better than a repeat of the same material on the same station escpecially if that is radio 2. it seems engineering on that station is now a gain riding auto level control and a compressor. Brian Yes, it absolutely is about psychoacoustics, not actual differences. That's why it is important to eliminate it. d |
Current trends in audio
|
Current trends in audio
Don Pearce wrote:
I find instant switchover causes problems, particularly in the bass end. ** Complete ********. You did not bother to read my link. If the two systems happen to have opposite phase, ** Whaaaaaatttt ???? Straw men all over the planet have their head hung in same after that POS. Don - here's a tip for you. When you have nothing worth while to contribute - shut up. ..... Phil |
Current trends in audio
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:18:54 +0000, Bill Taylor
wrote: On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:52:37 GMT, (Don Pearce) wrote: On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:27:36 +0000, Graeme Wall wrote: On 22/01/2017 09:52, Iain Churches wrote: "Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... Bit unfair on des. I used to see him live and most of the time he looked better than on the screen. I strongly dispute this old thing of the camera never lies. I think that very much depends on how its adjusted in the first place. Brian Yes. White balance. More to do with make-up and lighting, the white balance on the camera should be neutral. White balance - and particularly skin tone balance on TV suffered with the shift from illuminant C (the standard for the delta tube) and illuminant E which came in with the PIL tube. ??????? The colour reference in broadcast TV was Illuminant D and still was 15 months ago! Type of display is not really relevant. The phosphors changed over time but that affects colour gamut rather than colour temperature. I'm going back a bit. I know the mechanism is the gamut, but what happens when you have a different gamut in the camera to that on the screen is that colours don't map properly. For most colours that doesn't really matter, but for something as well-known as skin tone it really stands out. The place this is worst is in shops, where TVs are set to "shop mode". They colours look like neon signs and the contrast edges are a mass of ringing in their desperate attempt to look sharp. I don't know how anyone chooses a TV in a shop. d |
Current trends in audio
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 03:26:27 -0800 (PST), Phil Allison
wrote: Don Pearce wrote: I find instant switchover causes problems, particularly in the bass end. ** Complete ********. You did not bother to read my link. If the two systems happen to have opposite phase, ** Whaaaaaatttt ???? Straw men all over the planet have their head hung in same after that POS. Don - here's a tip for you. When you have nothing worth while to contribute - shut up. .... Phil No straw men. This happens - deal with it. d |
Current trends in audio
Johan Helsingius wrote:
Phil Allison wrote: ** That is a really worthless test methodology. True, ** Lets leave it at that. The principle is that of INSTANT change-over, while listening in stereo, in your home to your best loved tracks. Yes, an A/B switchbox is great - if you have two separate audio chains to compare. ** So you did not read my link either. For comparing two different source files, you need player software that can do the same in software. Foobar2000 has an ABX function for comparing music files that allows you similar instant switching between the two sound files. ** The original ABX system did not allow instant, seamless changeovers. I reckon a lot of folk would have saved themselves a lot of wasted time of it did. Note, the above is a massive understatement. I almost got Arny Krugar to agree with me on this, he's a hard guy to convince too. ..... Phil |
Current trends in audio
Don Pearce the asshole wrote:
** Complete ********. You did not bother to read my link. If the two systems happen to have opposite phase, ** Whaaaaaatttt ???? Straw men all over the planet have their heads hung in shame after that POS. Don - here's a tip for you. When you have nothing worth while to contribute - shut up. No straw men. ** Of course it is a massive straw man - you trolling ****wit. https://www.google.com.au/#q=straw+man+definition FFS, double you IQ and get half a brain. ..... Phil |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk