![]() |
Techmoan: Pre-recorded Cassettes' Last Stand
|
Techmoan: Pre-recorded Cassettes' Last Stand
What. I never reckoned pre recorded ones.
Killed by dolby B. They should have opted for dbx at the start. Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! "Adrian Caspersz" wrote in message ... DIGilog, never heard of that! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0beJZaOUYM -- Adrian C |
Techmoan: Pre-recorded Cassettes' Last Stand
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... What. I never reckoned pre recorded ones. Killed by dolby B. They should have opted for dbx at the start. Brian Many studios had both and so could have produced bin loop masters in either format.. Maybe it was the player manufacturers who chose Dolby B? Iain -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! "Adrian Caspersz" wrote in message ... DIGilog, never heard of that! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0beJZaOUYM -- Adrian C |
Techmoan: Pre-recorded Cassettes' Last Stand
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote: "Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... What. I never reckoned pre recorded ones. Killed by dolby B. They should have opted for dbx at the start. Brian Many studios had both and so could have produced bin loop masters in either format.. Maybe it was the player manufacturers who chose Dolby B? IIRC, Philips only licensed the use of their format if their specification was adhered to. Anything else would be a nonsense. -- *Cover me. I'm changing lanes. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Techmoan: Pre-recorded Cassettes' Last Stand
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Iain Churches wrote: "Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... What. I never reckoned pre recorded ones. Killed by dolby B. They should have opted for dbx at the start. Brian Many studios had both and so could have produced bin loop masters in either format.. Maybe it was the player manufacturers who chose Dolby B? IIRC, Philips only licensed the use of their format if their specification was adhered to. Anything else would be a nonsense. Agreed. So was it they who specified Dolby B ? It was the right choice! Iain |
Techmoan: Pre-recorded Cassettes' Last Stand
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Iain Churches wrote: "Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... What. I never reckoned pre recorded ones. Killed by dolby B. They should have opted for dbx at the start. Brian Many studios had both and so could have produced bin loop masters in either format.. Maybe it was the player manufacturers who chose Dolby B? IIRC, Philips only licensed the use of their format if their specification was adhered to. Anything else would be a nonsense. Dobly B was not a part of the spec. The C cassette was launched in 1963 and Dolby B was first demonstrated five years later Iain |
Techmoan: Pre-recorded Cassettes' Last Stand
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote: IIRC, Philips only licensed the use of their format if their specification was adhered to. Anything else would be a nonsense. Dobly B was not a part of the spec. The C cassette was launched in 1963 and Dolby B was first demonstrated five years later The Compact Cassette was introduced as a mono format for dictation machines, etc. Philips were sensible enough to allow it to be used under license but free of charge. But did retain a degree of control over the basics. I'm not sure if this included the use of Dolby B or not. But did over the basics like speed. -- *Failure is not an option. It's bundled with your software. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Techmoan: Pre-recorded Cassettes' Last Stand
In article , Dave Plowman (News)
wrote: The Compact Cassette was introduced as a mono format for dictation machines, etc. Philips were sensible enough to allow it to be used under license but free of charge. But did retain a degree of control over the basics. I'm not sure if this included the use of Dolby B or not. But did over the basics like speed. IIRC They mandated aspects like the physical dimensions (inc. things like track widths and spacings), but I'm not sure about which 'electronic' details they might have defined or limited. They did try to flog their own 'noise reduction' (DNS?) system which was single-ended. But I don't recall that they could (or attempted to) block or control the adoption of Dolby. If nothing else, they couldn't have stopped anyone from buying a Bolby adaptor box, anyway! Given how good Dolby was they probably twigged quite quickly it would be good for sales, and hence their own deck/cassette royalties! Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Techmoan: Pre-recorded Cassettes' Last Stand
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Iain Churches wrote: IIRC, Philips only licensed the use of their format if their specification was adhered to. Anything else would be a nonsense. Dobly B was not a part of the spec. The C cassette was launched in 1963 and Dolby B was first demonstrated five years later The Compact Cassette was introduced as a mono format for dictation machines, etc. Philips were sensible enough to allow it to be used under license but free of charge. But did retain a degree of control over the basics. I'm not sure if this included the use of Dolby B or not. But did over the basics like speed. The spec laid down in Sept 1963 could not have included Dolby B as this was still five years away from the first demonstration in 1968 Iain |
Techmoan: Pre-recorded Cassettes' Last Stand
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Iain Churches wrote: IIRC, Philips only licensed the use of their format if their specification was adhered to. Anything else would be a nonsense. Dobly B was not a part of the spec. The C cassette was launched in 1963 and Dolby B was first demonstrated five years later The Compact Cassette was introduced as a mono format for dictation machines, etc. Philips were sensible enough to allow it to be used under license but free of charge. But did retain a degree of control over the basics. I'm not sure if this included the use of Dolby B or not. But did over the basics like speed. The spec laid down in Sept 1963 could not have included Dolby B as this was still five years away from the first demonstration in 1968 Yes - you made that point earlier. Did you miss the bit about the original purpose of the compact cassette? -- *With her marriage she got a new name and a dress.* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk