A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Why do SACDs sound better? (Soft troll)



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old July 15th 03, 01:49 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
RobH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 34
Default Why do SACDs sound better? (Soft troll)


"Jim H" wrote in message
news

That's not to say analogue is ideal, there's a trade off between
analogue accuracy and digital precision.


I'm afraid those are only words without an explanation.


Expanation:

Contrary to popular belief the terms 'acuracy' and 'precision' are not
synonyms.

A digital signal may have perfect pcecision, that is, what is
transmitted/pressed is exactly what arrives. however that signal is

only
accurate to a certain degree. In the example of cd audio, an atomic

sound
is the nearest of about 65,000 options for that 1/44,000 of a second.

Now, for an analogue signal, the accuracy is perfect, the sound isn't

said
to be 'to the nearest x'.

Nice theory but how does that work in practice?
Don't analogue signals suffer all sorts of atenuation and distortion
once you attempt to propogate them?

I suppose you could argue that a record is 'to
the nearest atom of vinyl'

Only if the "resolution" of the mastering process is at an atomic level
and if you start to examine vinyl at an atomic level the actual playing
of the record will alter the shape of the groove simply because of
difference of the physical properties of diamond and vinyl.

but accuracy on that level is pretty much
irrelevent because an analogue copy is never totally precise - what is
transmitted or pressed will not be exactly the same as the original

and
with every copy the errors get worse.

Digital = perfect precision, limited accuracy.
Analogue = limited precision, perfect accuracy.

That's the tradeoff!

NB: I'm not saying anything about the superiority of the sound of

either
format here.




--
RobH
The future's dim, the future's mono.


  #2 (permalink)  
Old July 15th 03, 01:55 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim H
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 129
Default Why do SACDs sound better? (Soft troll)


Now, for an analogue signal, the accuracy is perfect, the sound isn't

said
to be 'to the nearest x'.

Nice theory but how does that work in practice?
Don't analogue signals suffer all sorts of atenuation and distortion
once you attempt to propogate them?


Yes, but that lowers the precision of the signal, not the accuracy. The two
are not the same.

I suppose you could argue that a record is 'to
the nearest atom of vinyl'

Only if the "resolution" of the mastering process is at an atomic level
and if you start to examine vinyl at an atomic level the actual playing
of the record will alter the shape of the groove simply because of
difference of the physical properties of diamond and vinyl.


That's why I went on to say "accuracy on that level is pretty much
irrelevent", It remains that the axiom of a vinyl recording is the atom.

--
Jim H
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.