A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Why do SACDs sound better? (Soft troll)



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11 (permalink)  
Old July 16th 03, 06:46 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Dave Plowman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 735
Default Why do SACDs sound better? (Soft troll)

In article ,
Chris Isbell wrote:
IIRC it was to get the whole of Beethoven's 9th symphony on a single
disc or is this an urban myth?


CD was a 74 minute format (not 60 minutes) right from the very start.


Was that because the non-historically informed conductors of earlier
recordings played Beethoven's 9th Symphony more slowly than is
considered 'correct' today? ('Correct' means what we currently believe
Beethoven intended.)


The real reason is that the longest tape available for a U-Matic which
was a semi pro video recorder ideal for recording digital audio, was a 90
minute PAL device running at 50 Hz. Change this same length tape to a 60
Hz system and you get 75 minutes - just long enough to include a line up.

--
*Someday, we'll look back on this, laugh nervously and change the subject

Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.