A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Why do SACDs sound better? (Soft troll)



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #24 (permalink)  
Old July 17th 03, 12:53 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default (O/T) - Why do SACDs sound better? (Soft troll)

Keith G wrote:
"Chris Isbell" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:16:42 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

Tech Spec:
PCM -1600 Digital Recording system
Sampling Rate: 44,056


Why the very strange sample rate?


No idea - all details were copied straight from the record sleeve.


It's because NTSC frame rate is usually not 30 frames (60 fields) per
second but 29.97 (59.94 fields), a ratio of 1000/1001.[*] The PCM-1600
used a broadcast quality NTSC video recorder, so

59.94 x 245 lines x 3 (samples/line) ~= 44.056 kHz

Andrew.
[*] This is done in order to minimize beating between the coulor
subcarrier and the sound subcarrier.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.