A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

In defense of Michael Jackson



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 06:19 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,uk.rec.audio
Ian Molton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,243
Default In defense of Michael Jackson

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:10:54 GMT
"2mb" wrote:


Yea. We don't take kindly to our kids being sodomized. Point me to a
pedophile that has been rehabilitated and I will show you that pig in
my back yard that can fly with it's wings and maybe we'll take a ski
trip to hell.


I know a couple. Im not inclined to give someone like you their names
though.

Yes, I have kids of my own, and no, I wouldnt want them in a situation
where someone could take advantage of them.

I still feel no compulsion to murder paedophiles. If they are ill, they
shouldnt be punished for their illness. They should be helped. Perhaps
some paedophiles arent ill, but then what would you say they are?

Is everyone who differs from the 'norm' ill?

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with
ketchup.
  #42 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 06:19 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,uk.rec.audio
Ian Molton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,243
Default In defense of Michael Jackson

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:14:06 GMT
"2mb" wrote:

So, take the sick and kill them, eh?


No, just the chronic pedophiles.


should we also tar and feather them?

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with ketchup.
  #43 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 06:19 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,uk.rec.audio
Ian Molton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,243
Default In defense of Michael Jackson

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:14:06 GMT
"2mb" wrote:

So, take the sick and kill them, eh?


No, just the chronic pedophiles.


should we also tar and feather them?

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with ketchup.
  #44 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 06:24 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,uk.rec.audio
2mb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default In defense of Michael Jackson

I don't feel a compulsion to murder pedophiles, just to give them what they
deserve.

I know a couple. Im not inclined to give someone like you their names
though.


If they are in the UK, they are your problem, not mine.


"Ian Molton" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:10:54 GMT
"2mb" wrote:


Yea. We don't take kindly to our kids being sodomized. Point me to a
pedophile that has been rehabilitated and I will show you that pig in
my back yard that can fly with it's wings and maybe we'll take a ski
trip to hell.


I know a couple. Im not inclined to give someone like you their names
though.

Yes, I have kids of my own, and no, I wouldnt want them in a situation
where someone could take advantage of them.

I still feel no compulsion to murder paedophiles. If they are ill, they
shouldnt be punished for their illness. They should be helped. Perhaps
some paedophiles arent ill, but then what would you say they are?

Is everyone who differs from the 'norm' ill?

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with
ketchup.



  #45 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 06:24 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,uk.rec.audio
2mb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default In defense of Michael Jackson

I don't feel a compulsion to murder pedophiles, just to give them what they
deserve.

I know a couple. Im not inclined to give someone like you their names
though.


If they are in the UK, they are your problem, not mine.


"Ian Molton" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:10:54 GMT
"2mb" wrote:


Yea. We don't take kindly to our kids being sodomized. Point me to a
pedophile that has been rehabilitated and I will show you that pig in
my back yard that can fly with it's wings and maybe we'll take a ski
trip to hell.


I know a couple. Im not inclined to give someone like you their names
though.

Yes, I have kids of my own, and no, I wouldnt want them in a situation
where someone could take advantage of them.

I still feel no compulsion to murder paedophiles. If they are ill, they
shouldnt be punished for their illness. They should be helped. Perhaps
some paedophiles arent ill, but then what would you say they are?

Is everyone who differs from the 'norm' ill?

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with
ketchup.



  #46 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 06:54 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,uk.rec.audio
2mb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default In defense of Michael Jackson

I still feel no compulsion to murder paedophiles. If they are ill, they
shouldnt be punished for their illness. They should be helped. Perhaps
some paedophiles arent ill, but then what would you say they are?


A liability, dangerous.

Is everyone who differs from the 'norm' ill?


Everyone is abnormal in their own little way. It is when your abnormality
causes you to murder, rape or harm others, then the justice system allows
you to do it over and over that something needs to be done about it. If the
person is incurable and dangerous, what's the point? Keep them locked up in
a filthy asylum or jail until they die (or get murdered in jail by thugs who
happen to be child rape victims)? That is worse than a death sentence. Let
them out on good behaviour so they can do it some more? You can't allow them
to keep raping kids. It is simply not an option.

I know a couple.


Good for you. I hope you guys have fun at the pub trading experiences over a
Guiness.

Im not inclined to give someone like you their names
though.


I have a list of 1000's. 16 within a 3 block radius of my house. I don't run
around killing them, or even spraypainting "PERV" on the front of their
houses (as much as I would like to, I am a little busy, and I might get the
wrong house). I just like to know who they are so if they come up to my son
with a cute little dog, some candy, and try to make friends with him, I know
to tell them to get the f**k away from my kid.

My son will have all of the neighborhood perv photos memorized by the time
he is 6, and instructions will be drilled into him on what to do *when* they
try something. He will understand their methods, and tricks. I consider this
the parental duty of anyone who has any regard for their children. I'd feel
pretty guilty looking him in his eyes if something happened and I didn't do
everything possible to prevent it. I wouldn't be able to live with myself.

Do you want them around your kids unattended? How about outside of the
neighborhood elementary school when it lets out for the afternoon. Pocket
full of candy, or pills... give me a break. They need to be dealt with
permanently. Every last one I have ever seen on the news is a repeat
offender.

"2mb" wrote in message
...
I don't feel a compulsion to murder pedophiles, just to give them what

they
deserve.

I know a couple. Im not inclined to give someone like you their names
though.


If they are in the UK, they are your problem, not mine.


"Ian Molton" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:10:54 GMT
"2mb" wrote:


Yea. We don't take kindly to our kids being sodomized. Point me to a
pedophile that has been rehabilitated and I will show you that pig in
my back yard that can fly with it's wings and maybe we'll take a ski
trip to hell.


I know a couple. Im not inclined to give someone like you their names
though.

Yes, I have kids of my own, and no, I wouldnt want them in a situation
where someone could take advantage of them.

I still feel no compulsion to murder paedophiles. If they are ill, they
shouldnt be punished for their illness. They should be helped. Perhaps
some paedophiles arent ill, but then what would you say they are?

Is everyone who differs from the 'norm' ill?

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with
ketchup.





  #47 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 06:54 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,uk.rec.audio
2mb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default In defense of Michael Jackson

I still feel no compulsion to murder paedophiles. If they are ill, they
shouldnt be punished for their illness. They should be helped. Perhaps
some paedophiles arent ill, but then what would you say they are?


A liability, dangerous.

Is everyone who differs from the 'norm' ill?


Everyone is abnormal in their own little way. It is when your abnormality
causes you to murder, rape or harm others, then the justice system allows
you to do it over and over that something needs to be done about it. If the
person is incurable and dangerous, what's the point? Keep them locked up in
a filthy asylum or jail until they die (or get murdered in jail by thugs who
happen to be child rape victims)? That is worse than a death sentence. Let
them out on good behaviour so they can do it some more? You can't allow them
to keep raping kids. It is simply not an option.

I know a couple.


Good for you. I hope you guys have fun at the pub trading experiences over a
Guiness.

Im not inclined to give someone like you their names
though.


I have a list of 1000's. 16 within a 3 block radius of my house. I don't run
around killing them, or even spraypainting "PERV" on the front of their
houses (as much as I would like to, I am a little busy, and I might get the
wrong house). I just like to know who they are so if they come up to my son
with a cute little dog, some candy, and try to make friends with him, I know
to tell them to get the f**k away from my kid.

My son will have all of the neighborhood perv photos memorized by the time
he is 6, and instructions will be drilled into him on what to do *when* they
try something. He will understand their methods, and tricks. I consider this
the parental duty of anyone who has any regard for their children. I'd feel
pretty guilty looking him in his eyes if something happened and I didn't do
everything possible to prevent it. I wouldn't be able to live with myself.

Do you want them around your kids unattended? How about outside of the
neighborhood elementary school when it lets out for the afternoon. Pocket
full of candy, or pills... give me a break. They need to be dealt with
permanently. Every last one I have ever seen on the news is a repeat
offender.

"2mb" wrote in message
...
I don't feel a compulsion to murder pedophiles, just to give them what

they
deserve.

I know a couple. Im not inclined to give someone like you their names
though.


If they are in the UK, they are your problem, not mine.


"Ian Molton" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:10:54 GMT
"2mb" wrote:


Yea. We don't take kindly to our kids being sodomized. Point me to a
pedophile that has been rehabilitated and I will show you that pig in
my back yard that can fly with it's wings and maybe we'll take a ski
trip to hell.


I know a couple. Im not inclined to give someone like you their names
though.

Yes, I have kids of my own, and no, I wouldnt want them in a situation
where someone could take advantage of them.

I still feel no compulsion to murder paedophiles. If they are ill, they
shouldnt be punished for their illness. They should be helped. Perhaps
some paedophiles arent ill, but then what would you say they are?

Is everyone who differs from the 'norm' ill?

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with
ketchup.





  #48 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 07:00 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,uk.rec.audio
2mb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default In defense of Michael Jackson

Tell that to the victims. See how they feel. Sorry. I feel that Uday Hussein
would do them right.

"G.Snail" wrote in message
...
"2mb" wrote:

Touching a boy is not having sex if the boy is OK with it even
private-part-touching. The boy can always say no and only stands to
lose ice-cream, soda-pop and maybe a free day at an amusement-park.
Many boys simply need touching because their parents and friends won't
do it and they feel left out of any intimacy in their lives and can
become dangerous criminals if not touched by some-one. ;-(

Dude! that is a sick ****ing joke and I hope it is forged.

I'm with his biographer. Someone needs to smack him around and tell him

to
stop hanging out with 12 year olds.
I hear this is an incurable disease, a compulsion. There are only 4 ways

to
fix it, a bullet, lethal injection, electrocution, and hanging.

I have a son, so check the perv lists quite often (thank god for these).
Some sicko around the corner from me, violated parole (for another

pedophile
conviction) and went to Virginia where he got a job babysitting a 2 year

old
girl. Absolutely horrifying. I think you can figure out the rest.

The guy used to walk by my house all the time, usually with 2-4 kids

under
12 in tow. I called the police at least 2 times a week and they never did
anything. What a sick, sick, joke. The whole thing was easily

preventable,
the authorities had all they needed to make a case, and did nothing. The

guy
was violating parole just being within 25 ft of a child. I gave them his
name and address. Nothing happened.

They need to first be tortured for about 10 years, 24x7, then put to

death
by grown up child molestation victims in the most painful way possible...
Mussolini style flaying with a gasoline marinade. I am sorry but cruel

and
unusual crimes need cruel and unusual punishment.


For a moment there I thought you had the moral high ground, but you
sink to the level of the people you despise. "10 years" of torture on
any living person would be a crime arguably many times more
reprehensible than child molestation.


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t



  #49 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 07:00 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,uk.rec.audio
2mb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default In defense of Michael Jackson

Tell that to the victims. See how they feel. Sorry. I feel that Uday Hussein
would do them right.

"G.Snail" wrote in message
...
"2mb" wrote:

Touching a boy is not having sex if the boy is OK with it even
private-part-touching. The boy can always say no and only stands to
lose ice-cream, soda-pop and maybe a free day at an amusement-park.
Many boys simply need touching because their parents and friends won't
do it and they feel left out of any intimacy in their lives and can
become dangerous criminals if not touched by some-one. ;-(

Dude! that is a sick ****ing joke and I hope it is forged.

I'm with his biographer. Someone needs to smack him around and tell him

to
stop hanging out with 12 year olds.
I hear this is an incurable disease, a compulsion. There are only 4 ways

to
fix it, a bullet, lethal injection, electrocution, and hanging.

I have a son, so check the perv lists quite often (thank god for these).
Some sicko around the corner from me, violated parole (for another

pedophile
conviction) and went to Virginia where he got a job babysitting a 2 year

old
girl. Absolutely horrifying. I think you can figure out the rest.

The guy used to walk by my house all the time, usually with 2-4 kids

under
12 in tow. I called the police at least 2 times a week and they never did
anything. What a sick, sick, joke. The whole thing was easily

preventable,
the authorities had all they needed to make a case, and did nothing. The

guy
was violating parole just being within 25 ft of a child. I gave them his
name and address. Nothing happened.

They need to first be tortured for about 10 years, 24x7, then put to

death
by grown up child molestation victims in the most painful way possible...
Mussolini style flaying with a gasoline marinade. I am sorry but cruel

and
unusual crimes need cruel and unusual punishment.


For a moment there I thought you had the moral high ground, but you
sink to the level of the people you despise. "10 years" of torture on
any living person would be a crime arguably many times more
reprehensible than child molestation.


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t



  #50 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 07:09 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,uk.rec.audio
Sander deWaal
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default In defense of Michael Jackson

Ian Molton said:

So, take the sick and kill them, eh?


No, just the chronic pedophiles.


should we also tar and feather them?


Nope, just cut off their dicks 'n be done with it.

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.