"Jim H" wrote in message
...
more from the 'Arny Krueger school' of uk.rec.audio-ism:

Next time you try to bias a listening test...

Why would Keith deliberately bias his own test?

Good question.

Why would he so staunchly resist reasonable efforts to remove bias?

Do you _really_ think he
edited one file slightly louder than the other on purpose?

No, I suspect the bias was applied in the analog domain, but I'm just
guessing.

Why?! He wasn't trying to sell anything or push an agenda.

Sure he was. It was a veiled vinyl versus CD comparison.

How about the more plausible explanation that because he didn't care for
ABX, he didn't bother making the files 'ABX-ready'.

Which begs the question why wouldn't he care for ABX? All it does is make
listening tests easier, more sensitive and free of bias.

more from the 'Arny Krueger school' of uk.rec.audio-ism:

Next time you try to bias a listening test...

Why would Keith deliberately bias his own test? Do you _really_ think he
edited one file slightly louder than the other on purpose? Why?! He wasn't
trying to sell anything or push an agenda.

How about the more plausable explanation that becasue he didn't care for
ABX, he didn't bother making the files 'ABX-ready'.

--
Jim H jh
@333
.org

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

Keith speaking as "Rudi", why don't you do the easy thing and just clean up
your act?

All this wailing and gnashing of teeth is not going to get you any place
productive.

Next time you try to bias a listening test, I'll jump all over you once
again. There's only one reasonable way out for you, and that's to clean up
your act. You know what it takes, so why don't you just quit crying like a
little baby and do things right next time?