
July 15th 03, 08:06 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|
FS: AudioQuest Digital Pro
1m long, solid silver, AQ's best ever digital cable.
Cost £150, asking £50 posted anywhere in the world.
Simon
|

July 15th 03, 10:47 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|
FS: AudioQuest Digital Pro
In article ,
Simon Connell wrote:
1m long, solid silver, AQ's best ever digital cable.
Just about any cable ever made would carry digits over that distance.
Cost £150, asking £50 posted anywhere in the world.
You've found this too, then?
--
*Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it.
Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn
|

July 16th 03, 04:03 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|
FS: AudioQuest Digital Pro
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:47:12 +0100, Dave Plowman
wrote:
In article ,
Simon Connell wrote:
1m long, solid silver, AQ's best ever digital cable.
Just about any cable ever made would carry digits over that distance.
Especially in the not so demanding world of digital HiFi. I mean, what is
cd, 150k/s? A £1 length of cat5 is good for at least 100M/s, enough for
more than 600 cd streams.
--
Jim H
|

July 16th 03, 06:16 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|
FS: AudioQuest Digital Pro
Hi,
In message , Jim H
writes
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:47:12 +0100, Dave Plowman
wrote:
In article ,
Simon Connell wrote:
1m long, solid silver, AQ's best ever digital cable.
Just about any cable ever made would carry digits over that distance.
Especially in the not so demanding world of digital HiFi. I mean, what
is cd, 150k/s? A £1 length of cat5 is good for at least 100M/s, enough
for more than 600 cd streams.
Right idea, but you're mixing bits and bytes.
--
Glenn Booth
|

July 16th 03, 07:14 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|
FS: AudioQuest Digital Pro
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:16:54 +0100, Glenn Booth
wrote:
Hi,
In message , Jim H
writes
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:47:12 +0100, Dave Plowman
wrote:
In article ,
Simon Connell wrote:
1m long, solid silver, AQ's best ever digital cable.
Just about any cable ever made would carry digits over that distance.
Especially in the not so demanding world of digital HiFi. I mean, what
is cd, 150k/s? A £1 length of cat5 is good for at least 100M/s, enough
for more than 600 cd streams.
Right idea, but you're mixing bits and bytes.
Oops. Never can get used to network engineers measuring everything in bits.
Anyway, I forget which is b/B so you can get either 600/8 or 600*8 cd
streams down cat5, both of which are contsiderably more than what you're
likely to actually need, 1
--
Jim
|

July 16th 03, 06:38 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|
FS: AudioQuest Digital Pro
In article ,
Jim H wrote:
1m long, solid silver, AQ's best ever digital cable.
Just about any cable ever made would carry digits over that distance.
Especially in the not so demanding world of digital HiFi. I mean, what
is cd, 150k/s? A £1 length of cat5 is good for at least 100M/s, enough
for more than 600 cd streams.
Yup. But you've got to understand the thinking. It's conceivable that
really poor (high capacitance) or extra long interconnects can make a
difference to an analogue signal - especially if high impedance valve
equipment is used.
So for those who don't *want* to understand any theory, *all*
interconnects can make a difference. That the signal is digital makes no
difference to this thinking at all.
--
*If at first you don't succeed, redefine success.
Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn
|

July 16th 03, 07:21 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|
FS: AudioQuest Digital Pro
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:38:28 +0100, Dave Plowman
wrote:
In article ,
Jim H wrote:
1m long, solid silver, AQ's best ever digital cable.
Just about any cable ever made would carry digits over that distance.
Especially in the not so demanding world of digital HiFi. I mean, what
is cd, 150k/s? A £1 length of cat5 is good for at least 100M/s, enough
for more than 600 cd streams.
Yup. But you've got to understand the thinking. It's conceivable that
really poor (high capacitance) or extra long interconnects can make a
difference to an analogue signal - especially if high impedance valve
equipment is used.
So for those who don't *want* to understand any theory, *all*
interconnects can make a difference. That the signal is digital makes no
difference to this thinking at all.
My favourite bit is when WhatHifi etc claim a CD transport to be "working
very hard". Yeah, right, that's why a £15 pc cd rom drive can read with
*ZERO* error at 30-50 times that speed!
--
Jim H
|

July 16th 03, 10:23 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|
FS: AudioQuest Digital Pro
A certain Jim H, of uk.rec.audio "fame", writes :
Especially in the not so demanding world of digital HiFi. I mean, what
is cd, 150k/s? A £1 length of cat5 is good for at least 100M/s, enough
for more than 600 cd streams.
Y'all got that right. This is snake-oil at it's finest.
--
"Jokes mentioning ducks were considered particularly funny." - cnn.com
|

July 16th 03, 10:36 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
FS: AudioQuest Digital Pro
In article , Chesney Christ wrote:
A certain Jim H, of uk.rec.audio "fame", writes :
Especially in the not so demanding world of digital HiFi. I mean, what
is cd, 150k/s? A £1 length of cat5 is good for at least 100M/s, enough
for more than 600 cd streams.
Y'all got that right. This is snake-oil at it's finest.
This is a problem for people who don't have much experience of hifi;
distilling the truth from the sea of snake-oil it swims in... I mean,
of course if you use badly shielded cable I guess it'll pick up some
mains hum/RF interference: but working out what expensive
interconnects, or speaker stands, are meant to do is distinctly
non-trivial :/
- Andrew
--
Andrew Walkingshaw |
|

July 17th 03, 08:29 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
FS: AudioQuest Digital Pro
A certain Andrew Walkingshaw, of uk.rec.audio "fame", writes :
Y'all got that right. This is snake-oil at it's finest.
This is a problem for people who don't have much experience of hifi;
distilling the truth from the sea of snake-oil it swims in... I mean,
of course if you use badly shielded cable I guess it'll pick up some
mains hum/RF interference: but working out what expensive
interconnects, or speaker stands, are meant to do is distinctly
non-trivial :/
You don't have to work out what they're meant to do, just listen to them
in a double-blind test. If you can't tell the difference blindfold,
there's little point in shelling out huge dough. The emperor really has
no clothes.
--
"Jokes mentioning ducks were considered particularly funny." - cnn.com
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
|