Thread: Usual sspcts
View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old March 22nd 06, 03:33 PM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
Ruud Broens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default Usual sspcts


"Ruud Broens" wrote in message
...
:
: "Ruud Broens" wrote in message
: ...
: : As there have been some 3 dozen postings,
: : with an added CQ Arny Don Stewart in the header
: : in a RAT thread on hybrid design
:
: : we may conclude:
: :
: : 1
: : Jenn is right, Andre! Nobody reads the headers
: : (they're just your organizational placeholders)
: :
: : 2
: : The SS team does not have any ideas or up-to-date
: : data on a subject clearly in their ballpark , 2
: :
: : 3
: : The SS team is not interested in discussing topics,
: : at all, just pickin' the occasional nit will do just fine
: :
: :
: : native RATs vs 'invited' ~RATs~
: :
: : 36 0
: :
: : ball's in your court
: : Rudy
: : :-)
4
recently, the Pinkerton Parliament ruled:
"My 'differences' with tubies are not that fundamental in the sense
: that I recognise tube amps as very attractive to the hobbyist, but I
: will point out the technical shortcomings, and I will blow away the
: smoke abd nmirrors, and general bull**** surrounding them. As for
: 'tubecraft', I'm sorry, but this technology was fully mature forty
: years ago, pretty much when valves became obsolete in audio
: amplifiers. If you want to play with different circuit configurations
: to see what they do, that's fine as a hobby, but optimised tube
: circuits have been done to death for *decades*."

as PP plays the sound of silence :

thanks for admitting there were no technical shortcomings

:-)