On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:39:23 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:12:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message



If you can
point to any instances where George has been drawn on
any subject, even politics, enough to make a fool of
himself I'd be interested to read it, but I certainly
can't recall one.

Spoken like a true Middius dupe.

Interesting that you chopped the part where I criticise
Middius.

Those were love taps.

Some of those love taps over the years have been delivered with
baseball bats on both sides. It should be obvious to anybody with
reading skills that George and I will never agree on many very basic
issues, especially given my conservative views.

It's all a setup Paul, you have a few little public
lover's quarrels with the Middiot so you can feign a modicum of objectivity.
The man is nuts, we all know it, but you can't bring yourself to even 1% of
the vituperation you unleash on me with considerable regularity.

I see that vituperation (verbal abuse or castigation; violent
denunciation or condemnation) is This Month's Word, replacing
dissemble. Well, first off I never unleash vituperation on anyone; I
take gentle digs at a few people, specifically you because you ask for
it more than anyone else. If you insist that what I post to you is
vituperation, I believe the impression held by many at RAO that you do
not see things as they are will only be reinforced.

George makes a fool of himself just about every time he
posts.

No. He shows that he's obsessed with bashing you every
time he posts. There's a difference.

That, too. At least he is making those really crazy noises about scaring me
off of RAO any more. Or is he?

I assume you mean he's NOT making crazy noises.

Many of his posts are incomprehensible to anybody but
his tiny clique of dupes.

I'm supposed to be one of his clique of dupes and I don't
understand them half the time, so that can't be right.

That must be why you're such a dupe, Paul. In essence you've admitted that
you aren't qualified to judge George's posts on the grounds of poor mental
powers. I can live with that. ;-)

What I'm saying is that George likes to write cryptic posts. Those I
ignore. Fortunately he writes enough posts in plain English for me to
gather what he's on about most of the time. You will note that I
write no more posts in support of his posts than I write in
opposition. As I'm sure he'd admit himself, George is slightly
eccentric, so there's no point going into agree/disagree mode with
him. I'm sure Jenn, Sander and others feel the same, which explains
why, despite your passionate urging, half of RAO doesn't rush to
condemn George every five minutes.

Please print this explanation onto a "sticky" and stick it somewhere
prominent for future reference.