"paul packer" wrote in message

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:12:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message



If you can
point to any instances where George has been drawn on
any subject, even politics, enough to make a fool of
himself I'd be interested to read it, but I certainly
can't recall one.

Spoken like a true Middius dupe.

Interesting that you chopped the part where I criticise
Middius.

Those were love taps. It's all a setup Paul, you have a few little public
lover's quarrels with the Middiot so you can feign a modicum of objectivity.
The man is nuts, we all know it, but you can't bring yourself to even 1% of
the vituperation you unleash on me with considerable regularity.

George makes a fool of himself just about every time he
posts.

No. He shows that he's obsessed with bashing you every
time he posts. There's a difference.

That, too. At least he is making those really crazy noises about scaring me
off of RAO any more. Or is he?

Many of his posts are incomprehensible to anybody but
his tiny clique of dupes.

I'm supposed to be one of his clique of dupes and I don't
understand them half the time, so that can't be right.

That must be why you're such a dupe, Paul. In essence you've admitted that
you aren't qualified to judge George's posts on the grounds of poor mental
powers. I can live with that. ;-)

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:39:23 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:12:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message



If you can
point to any instances where George has been drawn on
any subject, even politics, enough to make a fool of
himself I'd be interested to read it, but I certainly
can't recall one.

Spoken like a true Middius dupe.

Interesting that you chopped the part where I criticise
Middius.

Those were love taps.

Some of those love taps over the years have been delivered with
baseball bats on both sides. It should be obvious to anybody with
reading skills that George and I will never agree on many very basic
issues, especially given my conservative views.

It's all a setup Paul, you have a few little public
lover's quarrels with the Middiot so you can feign a modicum of objectivity.
The man is nuts, we all know it, but you can't bring yourself to even 1% of
the vituperation you unleash on me with considerable regularity.

I see that vituperation (verbal abuse or castigation; violent
denunciation or condemnation) is This Month's Word, replacing
dissemble. Well, first off I never unleash vituperation on anyone; I
take gentle digs at a few people, specifically you because you ask for
it more than anyone else. If you insist that what I post to you is
vituperation, I believe the impression held by many at RAO that you do
not see things as they are will only be reinforced.

George makes a fool of himself just about every time he
posts.

No. He shows that he's obsessed with bashing you every
time he posts. There's a difference.

That, too. At least he is making those really crazy noises about scaring me
off of RAO any more. Or is he?

I assume you mean he's NOT making crazy noises.

Many of his posts are incomprehensible to anybody but
his tiny clique of dupes.

I'm supposed to be one of his clique of dupes and I don't
understand them half the time, so that can't be right.

That must be why you're such a dupe, Paul. In essence you've admitted that
you aren't qualified to judge George's posts on the grounds of poor mental
powers. I can live with that. ;-)

What I'm saying is that George likes to write cryptic posts. Those I
ignore. Fortunately he writes enough posts in plain English for me to
gather what he's on about most of the time. You will note that I
write no more posts in support of his posts than I write in
opposition. As I'm sure he'd admit himself, George is slightly
eccentric, so there's no point going into agree/disagree mode with
him. I'm sure Jenn, Sander and others feel the same, which explains
why, despite your passionate urging, half of RAO doesn't rush to
condemn George every five minutes.

Please print this explanation onto a "sticky" and stick it somewhere
prominent for future reference.

"paul packer" wrote in message

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:39:23 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:12:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message



If you can
point to any instances where George has been drawn on
any subject, even politics, enough to make a fool of
himself I'd be interested to read it, but I certainly
can't recall one.

Spoken like a true Middius dupe.

Interesting that you chopped the part where I criticise
Middius.

Those were love taps.

Some of those love taps over the years have been
delivered with baseball bats on both sides.

Pshaw.

It should be
obvious to anybody with reading skills that George and I
will never agree on many very basic issues, especially
given my conservative views.

That is no doubt by design. But, your disagreements have the impact of the
wings of a butterfly fluttering.

It's all a setup Paul, you have a few little public
lover's quarrels with the Middiot so you can feign a
modicum of objectivity. The man is nuts, we all know it,
but you can't bring yourself to even 1% of the
vituperation you unleash on me with considerable
regularity.

I see that vituperation (verbal abuse or castigation;
violent denunciation or condemnation) is This Month's
Word, replacing dissemble.

Nonsense. I

Well, first off I never
unleash vituperation on anyone; I take gentle digs at a
few people, specifically you because you ask for it more
than anyone else.

How Middius-like of you, Paul. In fact I don't ask for abuse, I simply
respond in kind to a fraction of the abuse you gratutiously heap on me. I
know that both you and Middius have a thing for me, you can hardly contain
yourselves.

If you insist that what I post to you
is vituperation, I believe the impression held by many at
RAO that you do not see things as they are will only be
reinforced.

Would that be opinions held by many real people, or opinions asserted by
many sockpuppets?

George makes a fool of himself just about every time he
posts.

No. He shows that he's obsessed with bashing you every
time he posts. There's a difference.

That, too. At least he is making those really crazy
noises about scaring me off of RAO any more. Or is he?

I assume you mean he's NOT making crazy noises.

You got to get that reading comprehension problem of yours fixed one day,
Paul.

Many of his posts are incomprehensible to anybody but
his tiny clique of dupes.

I'm supposed to be one of his clique of dupes and I
don't understand them half the time, so that can't be
right.

That must be why you're such a dupe, Paul. In essence
you've admitted that you aren't qualified to judge
George's posts on the grounds of poor mental powers. I
can live with that. ;-)

What I'm saying is that George likes to write cryptic
posts.

Middius likes to fancy himself the leader of an in-crowd that adores him.
His social development seems locked at the middle or high school level.

Those I ignore.

Actually Paul, you just said that you don't understand them which implies
that you don't ignore them. But why should you worry about consistency when
you are back-pedaling at such a high rate of speed?

Fortunately he writes enough posts
in plain English for me to gather what he's on about most
of the time. You will note that I write no more posts in
support of his posts than I write in opposition.

I will note no such thing. If you think this is really true, you've got some
serious problems with perceiving your own actions, Paul.

As I'm
sure he'd admit himself, George is slightly eccentric, so
there's no point going into agree/disagree mode with him.

Goodness, what kind of a dupe does it take to characterize George as being
"slightly eccentric"?

I'm sure Jenn, Sander and others feel the same, which
explains why, despite your passionate urging, half of RAO
doesn't rush to condemn George every five minutes.

Sorry Paul, but an explanation based on such an obviously false premise as
"George is slightly eccentric" is meaningless. Try to craft a more
believable falsehood next time, it makes things a tad more interesting.

Please print this explanation onto a "sticky" and stick
it somewhere prominent for future reference.

It's going where it belongs - the bit bucket.

The Krooborg

I don't ask for abuse

--

"Christians have to ... work to make the world as loving, just, and supportive as is possible."
A. Krooger, Aug. 2006

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:56:49 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


It should be
obvious to anybody with reading skills that George and I
will never agree on many very basic issues, especially
given my conservative views.

That is no doubt by design. But, your disagreements have the impact of the
wings of a butterfly fluttering.

By design? What, my conservatism? Haven't you noticed George's and my
world views are fundamentally opposed?

It's all a setup Paul, you have a few little public
lover's quarrels with the Middiot so you can feign a
modicum of objectivity. The man is nuts, we all know it,
but you can't bring yourself to even 1% of the
vituperation you unleash on me with considerable
regularity.

I see that vituperation (verbal abuse or castigation;
violent denunciation or condemnation) is This Month's
Word, replacing dissemble.

Nonsense. I

Time will tell.

Well, first off I never
unleash vituperation on anyone; I take gentle digs at a
few people, specifically you because you ask for it more
than anyone else.

How Middius-like of you, Paul. In fact I don't ask for abuse, I simply
respond in kind to a fraction of the abuse you gratutiously heap on me. I
know that both you and Middius have a thing for me, you can hardly contain
yourselves.

Get help, Arnie. Soon.

If you insist that what I post to you
is vituperation, I believe the impression held by many at
RAO that you do not see things as they are will only be
reinforced.

Would that be opinions held by many real people, or opinions asserted by
many sockpuppets?

Take a poll of the real people. Does Arny see things as they really
are?

No....nope...no way....hell no....you're joking.....

Thank you.

George makes a fool of himself just about every time he
posts.

No. He shows that he's obsessed with bashing you every
time he posts. There's a difference.

That, too. At least he is making those really crazy
noises about scaring me off of RAO any more. Or is he?

I assume you mean he's NOT making crazy noises.

You got to get that reading comprehension problem of yours fixed one day,
Paul.

Your sentence makes no sense unless you meant to say, "At least he is
NOT making those really crazy noises...." Are you going to deny that?
Better not--it'll just be another corner you've painted yourself into.

Many of his posts are incomprehensible to anybody but
his tiny clique of dupes.

I'm supposed to be one of his clique of dupes and I
don't understand them half the time, so that can't be
right.

That must be why you're such a dupe, Paul. In essence
you've admitted that you aren't qualified to judge
George's posts on the grounds of poor mental powers. I
can live with that. ;-)

What I'm saying is that George likes to write cryptic
posts.

Middius likes to fancy himself the leader of an in-crowd that adores him.
His social development seems locked at the middle or high school level.

Those I ignore.

Actually Paul, you just said that you don't understand them which implies
that you don't ignore them. But why should you worry about consistency when
you are back-pedaling at such a high rate of speed?

Now, now, Arnie. You know very well that I have to read them in order
to ignore them---i.e, not reply to them. You won't get any points on
RAO for that kind of transparent word trickery.

Fortunately he writes enough posts
in plain English for me to gather what he's on about most
of the time. You will note that I write no more posts in
support of his posts than I write in opposition.

I will note no such thing. If you think this is really true, you've got some
serious problems with perceiving your own actions, Paul.

Please reference those posts where I post after George saying things
like, "You're right, George, I agree absolutely." "That;'s just what I
was thinking, George," and "Go get 'em, George." I believe "paucity"
will be your new Word Of The Month after searching for those posts.

As I'm
sure he'd admit himself, George is slightly eccentric, so
there's no point going into agree/disagree mode with him.

Goodness, what kind of a dupe does it take to characterize George as being
"slightly eccentric"?

You will at least admit that his behaviour has improved considerably
over the last five years, unlike your own. Yet....I will give you
this: your literacy has improved somewhat, which is no small thing.
When you concentrate your posts are often of a quite admirable
standard.

I'm sure Jenn, Sander and others feel the same, which
explains why, despite your passionate urging, half of RAO
doesn't rush to condemn George every five minutes.

Sorry Paul, but an explanation based on such an obviously false premise as
"George is slightly eccentric" is meaningless. Try to craft a more
believable falsehood next time, it makes things a tad more interesting.

You should take what you can get, Arnie. Would you rather I'd claimed
that George was a shining example of charity and chastity?

Please print this explanation onto a "sticky" and stick
it somewhere prominent for future reference.

It's going where it belongs - the bit bucket.

I'm not familiar with that particular receptacle.

"paul packer" wrote in message
...

Take a poll of the real people.

Enough of them respect me, like to hang out with me, work with me, and share
life's experiences with me, to keep my life interesting. You're the guy that
actually bases his judgements of people on what you see on RAO.

Does Arny see things as they really are?

Well nobody sees things as they really are, Paul. I guess that's part of
your psychosis - you seem to think you see things as they really are.

The fundamental flaw with your mind-set is that nobody knows how things
*really* are - we just know about our perceptions.

In your case Paul, you base your judgements on what you see in RAO, which is
a well-known pile of crap due to Middius and his clique, yourself and Jenn
included.