Spherical stylus = sound with *balls*..???
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message
...
In article , Keith G
wrote:
"Don Pearce" wrote
Mic very close to speaker, yes?
Yes, the usual - about 9 inches, but not the usual mics.
And not directly in line with the
tweeter.
Correct - about in line with the bass units. (It was the *slam* I was
after!)
This means that what you recorded will probably sound quite
unrepresentive
of what the sound is like out in the room.
Absolutely right.
When I post soundclips they are mostly (usually only) for Don's benefit
as few other have ever commented. I know he is a capable and experienced
listener and can probably *hear through* the obvious
artifacts/distortions. (It normally takes 3 or 4 passes for most people
to break down the *strangeness* of a new 'sound!) But the fact is he's a
*subwoofer user* and I'm not; I have never been able to tolerate one for
more than a few minutes - I don't even use one for movies! Don and I
would never choose the same system - not for vinyl, at least....
(I can and do use 'blameless audio' for radio and movies most of the
time... ;-)
That's *on paper* - anybody/everybody knows you get much better
*phat*
slam in the real world from vinyl!! (This is about *sound* - not
*signal*; you can forget the figures when it comes to hosing the
actual
noise about..!! :-)
You can certainly ignore the figures, or be ignorant of them, or have
no
idea how to interpret what they mean... I don't think that "everybody"
falls into that category, though, although it may be true of many...
:-)
:-)
Even the manufacturers throw the figures out when it comes to
engineering a little 'cut and lift' in here and there to create a
*sound* do they not...??
|