On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:38:02 +0000, tony sayer
wrote:

In article , Dave Plowman (News)
scribeth thus
In article ,
tony sayer wrote:
You won't like DAB quality, believe me.

For R3?

DAB in many cases will provide far better sound quality than FM on R3.


We won't go into that one again Dave what abaht the other radio services
from the BBC eh?.

The OP specifically mentioned R3. And only R3.

And pray why should radio 3 be more deserving?..

For instance.. do they have inferior equipment in the studios?...

It could be argued that R3 needs less. It is much easier to perform
data compression on a signal with a natural dynamic than a heavily
dynamics-compressed one. The extra dynamic range offers far better
opportunities to make use of masking.

d

--
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com