"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message

In article ,
BBC is biased towards DAB wrote:
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message

In article ,
tony sayer wrote:
I reckon that Dab as we know it will die away left behind by
other
radio
tech, and theres still no firm date for digital changeover indeed
a
lot
of the commercial sector can't afford to run DAB and FM
transmissions..

If enough pull out of DAB it will force the 'rental' costs down.
They were
ludicrous to start with.


Really? You were disputing that the transmission costs were high a
week or two ago. You seem to have changed your tune.

Are you thick or just a fool?


Oh, the irony.


I argued that DAB costs aren't intrinsically higher than any other
transmission medium.

But since this is too difficult for you to understand I'll not
bother
again.


And Tony Sayer told you that DAB was intrinsically more expensive.

What would you know about this anyway? Your early comments on this
subject seemed to suggest that you thought that it was mainly down to
electricity bills, which shows how utterly clueless you are about the
whole subject of transmission costs.



--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

The adoption of DAB was the most incompetent technical
decision ever made in the history of UK broadcasting:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/da...ion_of_dab.htm