Arny Krueger wrote:
"Keith G" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Laurence Payne" wrote in
message
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:27:20 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

There's some distortion in the sax sound at 2.44. Maybe in the
recording chain, maybe spit sound from
the sax, maybe a MP3 artifact. Whatever it is, the
eq'd version emphasises it.
If its spit, its not distortion. Since you don't know,
your comment is meaningless.
Not worth arguing. "Unwanted sound" then.
Accurate use of words seems to be a lost art around here.

Have a listen.
I have already listened to my own track, and compared it
to the fiction that Kitty posted here. He didn't
implement my recommendation exactly. Besides, my
recommendation was a just first cut, not a recipie for a
finished, mastered recording.

Wake up THICKO..!!

I only recorded the clarinet - I mixed NOTHING, I EQ'd NOTHING.

What is this?

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/showntell/GeorgiaMEQ.mp3


It's your suggestion EQ'd by *Iain* and sent to me for purposes of
posting a 'before and after'/'better or worse' comparison'!

You *know* I neither have the software or skill (or the inclination to
acquire either one) do you not?

I don't like *processed* anything - I'm actually with you on mic pairs,
but your paranoia would let you see that, would it?

Your trouble, Arny, stems from having too many cars with automatic
gearboxes - in the 'manual' UK, most people learn to engage the brain
before letting the mouth out...







What does the EQ in the file name mean?