I'd not call Radio 3 320k aac "crap quality". And you've missed the point
that this is a *test*. It may develop if successful and people encourage
them.

Jim

In article , Brian Gaff
wrote:
So they hide this away, and have no plans to give services. Interesting.
I'd have thought that if they did live stuff on the Radio 2 network they
would get more feedback, or is the idea to say nobody cares so we can
carry on doing what we do in crap quality. Brian

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html