A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Being Socially Useful



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old December 23rd 03, 07:25 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Ian Bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 213
Default Being Socially Useful

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:52:41 +0000, Ian Bell
wrote:

Roy wrote:


"David Houpt" wrote in message
...
Hi

I haven't posted for a while, but seeing an amplifier get a rave
review when it has a distortion level of 2.3% rising to 4% at full
output provoked me. Its the Graaf GM20 reviewed in the November issue
of Hi Fi World. Yours for a mere £3,300. Is the world going mad? I
though that the idea was that amplifiers had as little distortion as
possible. 0.1% as Harold Leak used to claim.


Not if all competent amps sound the same, so you have to provide some
deliberate degradation to justify the 3 grand ticket!

Sounds OK for a guitar amp.

Oh and if your test material for a £3k amp is Christina Aguilera (see
the review at http://www.ukd.co.uk/scms/news-detail.asp?PKID=24) you're
probably not a full shilling anyway.

Roy.


The bit in that review I liked best was 'The amp can be run direct from
any CD, SACD or DVD player via a passive preamp'

Isn't passive preamp an oxymoron?


I prefer the term 'passive controller', and I use one myself, but an
Oxymoron is someone who couldn't get into Cambridge...... :-)


That at least makes sense but what *is* it? passive vol and tone controls?

Ian
  #2 (permalink)  
Old December 24th 03, 07:19 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Stewart Pinkerton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,367
Default Being Socially Useful

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 20:25:20 +0000, Ian Bell
wrote:

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:52:41 +0000, Ian Bell
wrote:

Roy wrote:


The bit in that review I liked best was 'The amp can be run direct from
any CD, SACD or DVD player via a passive preamp'

Isn't passive preamp an oxymoron?


I prefer the term 'passive controller', and I use one myself, but an
Oxymoron is someone who couldn't get into Cambridge...... :-)

That at least makes sense but what *is* it? passive vol and tone controls?


Oh, right, I didn't realise you weren't familiar with the term. It's
just a pot and a source selector switch in a box, or a pot and a pile
of relays in my case.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
  #3 (permalink)  
Old December 24th 03, 09:08 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Ian Bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 213
Default Being Socially Useful

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 20:25:20 +0000, Ian Bell
wrote:

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:52:41 +0000, Ian Bell
wrote:

Roy wrote:


The bit in that review I liked best was 'The amp can be run direct from
any CD, SACD or DVD player via a passive preamp'

Isn't passive preamp an oxymoron?

I prefer the term 'passive controller', and I use one myself, but an
Oxymoron is someone who couldn't get into Cambridge...... :-)

That at least makes sense but what *is* it? passive vol and tone controls?


Oh, right, I didn't realise you weren't familiar with the term. It's
just a pot and a source selector switch in a box, or a pot and a pile
of relays in my case.


Cheers. Makes sense now.

Merry Xmas

Ian

  #4 (permalink)  
Old December 24th 03, 09:08 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Ian Bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 213
Default Being Socially Useful

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 20:25:20 +0000, Ian Bell
wrote:

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:52:41 +0000, Ian Bell
wrote:

Roy wrote:


The bit in that review I liked best was 'The amp can be run direct from
any CD, SACD or DVD player via a passive preamp'

Isn't passive preamp an oxymoron?

I prefer the term 'passive controller', and I use one myself, but an
Oxymoron is someone who couldn't get into Cambridge...... :-)

That at least makes sense but what *is* it? passive vol and tone controls?


Oh, right, I didn't realise you weren't familiar with the term. It's
just a pot and a source selector switch in a box, or a pot and a pile
of relays in my case.


Cheers. Makes sense now.

Merry Xmas

Ian

  #5 (permalink)  
Old December 24th 03, 07:19 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Stewart Pinkerton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,367
Default Being Socially Useful

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 20:25:20 +0000, Ian Bell
wrote:

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:52:41 +0000, Ian Bell
wrote:

Roy wrote:


The bit in that review I liked best was 'The amp can be run direct from
any CD, SACD or DVD player via a passive preamp'

Isn't passive preamp an oxymoron?


I prefer the term 'passive controller', and I use one myself, but an
Oxymoron is someone who couldn't get into Cambridge...... :-)

That at least makes sense but what *is* it? passive vol and tone controls?


Oh, right, I didn't realise you weren't familiar with the term. It's
just a pot and a source selector switch in a box, or a pot and a pile
of relays in my case.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.