On Sun, 08 May 2005 08:15:49 -0400, George M. Middius
wrote:



Don Pearce said:

You have. This thread is cross-posted there :-(

Paulie rolls over and plays dead on command. Last time he surfaced, the
command was "God wants NATO to perish in a cauldron of flames in Iraq." We
haven't learned what the new command is. I'm thinking of trying out
something related to rogue icebergs.

Well, you haven't lost your talent for gobbledegook, George, nor for
willfully mis-interpreting everything anyone of a different mind-set
to your own utters. But hell, you're good value most of the time, and
I guess there's room in the world for all types.

Now could you tell us what icebergs have to do with anything.

George M. Middius wrote:

Don Pearce said:


You have. This thread is cross-posted there :-(


Paulie rolls over and plays dead on command. Last time he surfaced, the
command was "God wants NATO to perish in a cauldron of flames in Iraq." We
haven't learned what the new command is. I'm thinking of trying out
something related to rogue icebergs.





AH Georgie , your a dickhead.

Don Pearce said:

You have. This thread is cross-posted there :-(

Paulie rolls over and plays dead on command. Last time he surfaced, the
command was "God wants NATO to perish in a cauldron of flames in Iraq." We
haven't learned what the new command is. I'm thinking of trying out
something related to rogue icebergs.

And their impact on Kansas?

Only a Scarecrow would ask a question like that.

paul packer said:

Paulie rolls over and plays dead on command. Last time he surfaced, the
command was "God wants NATO to perish in a cauldron of flames in Iraq." We
haven't learned what the new command is. I'm thinking of trying out
something related to rogue icebergs.

Now could you tell us what icebergs have to do with anything.

Good boy. Here's your treat. Now beg for more.

"paul packer" wrote in message
...

Now could you tell us what icebergs have to do with
anything.

Now that's a Titanic question ;-)

BTW Pointless thread, pointless discussion, equally
pointless answer. But hey it's being read on RAO so they're
used to it.

TT

On Sun, 8 May 2005 21:06:25 +0800, "TT"
wrote:

BTW Pointless thread, pointless discussion, equally
pointless answer. But hey it's being read on RAO so they're
used to it.

TT

I see you know your NGs, TT.

On Sun, 08 May 2005 22:45:29 +1000, atec wrote:

George M. Middius wrote:

Don Pearce said:


You have. This thread is cross-posted there :-(


Paulie rolls over and plays dead on command. Last time he surfaced, the
command was "God wants NATO to perish in a cauldron of flames in Iraq." We
haven't learned what the new command is. I'm thinking of trying out
something related to rogue icebergs.





AH Georgie , your a dickhead.

Now don't insult my friend George, especially with bad spelling.
George is one of a kind, and we should all be grateful for that.

paul packer wrote:
On Sun, 08 May 2005 22:45:29 +1000, atec wrote:


George M. Middius wrote:

Don Pearce said:



You have. This thread is cross-posted there :-(


Paulie rolls over and plays dead on command. Last time he surfaced, the
command was "God wants NATO to perish in a cauldron of flames in Iraq." We
haven't learned what the new command is. I'm thinking of trying out
something related to rogue icebergs.






AH Georgie , your a dickhead.


Now don't insult my friend George, especially with bad spelling.
George is one of a kind, and we should all be grateful for that.
WAs I misinformed ?
Georgie is normally a girl ?

In message , paul packer
writes
On Sun, 08 May 2005 22:45:29 +1000, atec wrote:

George M. Middius wrote:

Don Pearce said:


You have. This thread is cross-posted there :-(


Paulie rolls over and plays dead on command. Last time he surfaced, the
command was "God wants NATO to perish in a cauldron of flames in Iraq." We
haven't learned what the new command is. I'm thinking of trying out
something related to rogue icebergs.





AH Georgie , your a dickhead.

Now don't insult my friend George, especially with bad spelling.
George is one of a kind, and we should all be grateful for that.

I don't think it is bad spelling, it's just that there are very few
Americans who seem to know the difference between YOUR and YOU'RE.
--
Chris Morriss

I don't think it is bad spelling, it's just that there are very few Americans who seem to know the difference between YOUR and
YOU'RE.

There are very (VERY) few English who know the difference.

I was looking round LiveJournal last night, and there was a friend of a
friend, an Indian guy, living in India. In his profile, he used
the word "paucity". How many English even know that word?