"APR" wrote in message
...
Check out this link Clyde

http://www.cre.gov.uk/gdpract/g_and_t_facts.html



Wot a load of ********.....

"Clyde Slick" wrote


Question:

What does 'no travellers' refer to?


It's a sign put up by publicans who don't want all the copper and brassware
nicked out of their toilet facilities...

'Travellers' = 'Pikeys' = 'Tinkies' = *not* true Gypsies who came originally
from Pakistan (not Ireland) via Egypt and whom all live in Rumania and Spain
now....


(Forget the silly books, websites etc. and watch the movie 'Snatch' for a
*far* more accurate depiction... ;-)

"Don Pearce" wrote


Hell. I thought I'd just flashed back to RAO. Hell again.

You have. This thread is cross-posted there :-(




Ain't hard for anyone to *uncrosspost* it.

(If they *really* want to.....!! ;-)

On Sun, 08 May 2005 14:06:12 GMT, "Fleetie"
wrote:

I don't think it is bad spelling, it's just that there are very few Americans who seem to know the difference between YOUR and
YOU'RE.

There are very (VERY) few English who know the difference.

I was looking round LiveJournal last night, and there was a friend of a
friend, an Indian guy, living in India. In his profile, he used
the word "paucity". How many English even know that word?


There would be a dearth of them.

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Chris Morriss said:

I don't think it is bad spelling, it's just that there are very few
Americans who seem to know the difference between YOUR and YOU'RE.

Yes, very few of us indeed. Thank goodness we have you Ozzies to teach us
about spelling and, even more important, beeah. Miller may be weak and
watery, but Foster's is weak, watery, and overpriced.

Fleetie said:

I was looking round LiveJournal last night, and there was a friend of a
friend, an Indian guy, living in India. In his profile, he used
the word "paucity". How many English even know that word?

Only a panjandrum of perspicacity would care about that.

Keith G said:

Wot a load of ********.....

Agreed. Not all gypsies are tramps and thieves.

Fleetie wrote:

I don't think it is bad spelling, it's just that there are very few Americans who seem to know the difference between YOUR and
YOU'RE.


There are very (VERY) few English who know the difference.

I was looking round LiveJournal last night, and there was a friend of a
friend, an Indian guy, living in India. In his profile, he used
the word "paucity". How many English even know that word?

Sure we do. Pau City is in the Pyrenees.

--
Eiron.

Chris Morriss wrote:
In message , paul packer
writes

On Sun, 08 May 2005 22:45:29 +1000, atec wrote:

George M. Middius wrote:


Don Pearce said:


You have. This thread is cross-posted there :-(



Paulie rolls over and plays dead on command. Last time he surfaced, the
command was "God wants NATO to perish in a cauldron of flames in
Iraq." We
haven't learned what the new command is. I'm thinking of trying out
something related to rogue icebergs.





AH Georgie , your a dickhead.


Now don't insult my friend George, especially with bad spelling.
George is one of a kind, and we should all be grateful for that.


I don't think it is bad spelling, it's just that there are very few
Americans who seem to know the difference between YOUR and YOU'RE.
Well I will concede that , but I am not a septic . Truthfully though
this is Usenet and spelling is pretty much irrelevant excluding a few
anal drop kicks .

I don't think it is bad spelling, it's just that there are very few Americans who seem to know the difference between YOUR and
YOU'RE.
Well I will concede that , but I am not a septic . Truthfully though this is Usenet and spelling is pretty much irrelevant
excluding a few anal drop kicks .

You present the image you want to, dude.

By the way, you're flying low. Not something I wanna see. But hey, it's
you image.



Martin
-
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890
Manchester, U.K. http://www.livejournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=fleetie