A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Needs to



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old May 21st 04, 09:58 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Form@C
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Needs to

On Wed, 19 May 2004 23:08:49 +0100, Keith G wrote:

OK, seems I gotta be the one to post this he

See:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...m=8101010 615

Some dickhead has paid £120 for an empty box (inc. p&p) and ain't too happy
about it - check the buyer's feedback. What makes me smile is the seller
appears to be quite comfortable with it - check his feedback to the buyer!

Now, is it me, or is there *just enough* ambiguity in the description and
auction title to trap the unwary....???



Personally, if I had been interested in this auction because I wanted an
X-Box, I would have clarified with the seller whether the box was empty or
not before I made a bid - I would have least requested more information
like whether controllers or other items were included. It would have been
sensible on my part and would have removed any possible misunderstanding.
Certainly, the auction description reads accurately as it stands. I would
have assumed the box to be empty from the description. Whether others
would have read it the same way is something else!

Whether any prospective buyer for this item should be refered to as a
"dickhead" is arguable. There are people around for whom appearances are
very important. They would see even an empty box (particularly one which
is for a limited edition item) as having a real value. It appears that the
actual buyer wasn't one of these and hasn't made any checks. He has bought
based on the description given - which is actually very good, but isn't
for what he wanted.

IMHO the seller should offer a null sale. I say this purely because I
think that there has been a "sin of omission". Although the description
is good and accurate it doesn't really go far enough. I would definitely
have preferred to see the box described with the word "empty" or with a
foot note similar to "Note that this item does NOT include an X-Box or
accessories". After all, if the X-Box had been included the seller would
probably have made a point of informing prospective bidders that the unit
was in working condition or included a controller.

--
Cheers...
Mick
Gave up on viruses & trojans - moved to Linux... :-)
Nascom & Gemini info at http://www.nascom.info
  #2 (permalink)  
Old May 21st 04, 03:56 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default Needs to


"Form@C" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 19 May 2004 23:08:49 +0100, Keith G wrote:

OK, seems I gotta be the one to post this he

See:


http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...m=8101010 615

Some dickhead has paid £120 for an empty box (inc. p&p) and ain't too

happy
about it - check the buyer's feedback. What makes me smile is the seller
appears to be quite comfortable with it - check his feedback to the

buyer!

Now, is it me, or is there *just enough* ambiguity in the description

and
auction title to trap the unwary....???



Personally, if I had been interested in this auction because I wanted an
X-Box, I would have clarified with the seller whether the box was empty or
not before I made a bid - I would have least requested more information
like whether controllers or other items were included. It would have been
sensible on my part and would have removed any possible misunderstanding.
Certainly, the auction description reads accurately as it stands. I would
have assumed the box to be empty from the description. Whether others
would have read it the same way is something else!



Maybe a lot of us don't have as finely-honed eBaying skills as you?



Whether any prospective buyer for this item should be refered to as a
"dickhead" is arguable.



A somewhat 'unkind' turn of phrase I agree, but what other descriptive best
fits someone who has paid £120 for an empty box and clearly isn't happy to
have done so?


There are people around for whom appearances are
very important. They would see even an empty box (particularly one which
is for a limited edition item) as having a real value. It appears that the
actual buyer wasn't one of these and hasn't made any checks. He has bought
based on the description given - which is actually very good, but isn't
for what he wanted.



OK, how about 'plonker' then - is that fair do you think? :-)



IMHO the seller should offer a null sale.



Yes, so do I - or a partial refund, at least.


I say this purely because I
think that there has been a "sin of omission".



Yes and obfuscation.....

(Remember the successful bidder wasn't the only one lobbing serious money at
this empty box!)


Although the description
is good and accurate it doesn't really go far enough. I would definitely
have preferred to see the box described with the word "empty" or with a
foot note similar to "Note that this item does NOT include an X-Box or
accessories".



Exactamento.


After all, if the X-Box had been included the seller would
probably have made a point of informing prospective bidders that the unit
was in working condition or included a controller.



Etc. etc. Quite.......




  #3 (permalink)  
Old May 22nd 04, 02:49 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Form@C
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Needs to

On Fri, 21 May 2004 16:56:52 +0100, Keith G wrote:

snip


Maybe a lot of us don't have as finely-honed eBaying skills as you?


grin You obviously don't know me, Keith! I have *no* eBaying skills
whatever - never having used it at all! :-)

Whether any prospective buyer for this item should be refered to as a
"dickhead" is arguable.



A somewhat 'unkind' turn of phrase I agree, but what other descriptive
best fits someone who has paid £120 for an empty box and clearly isn't
happy to have done so?


a wishfull thinker?
The gent in question will definitely learn from this mistake one way or
another...


snip
IMHO the seller should offer a null sale.



Yes, so do I - or a partial refund, at least.


I say this purely because I
think that there has been a "sin of omission".



Yes and obfuscation.....

(Remember the successful bidder wasn't the only one lobbing serious
money at this empty box!)

snip

I can't see anywhere where the seller deliberately sets out to mislead
prospective buyers - that's the problem. If he did, then it would be easy
to condemn him as a fraud and a cheat - as it is, he may well attract
those tags any way.

If he is politically astute then offering a largeish refund could be a
very good thing - leaving him with a profit, teaching the buyer to be more
careful in future and earning "respect" points from fellow eBayers. :-)

It is possible that some of the losing bidders actually wanted an empty
box of course and are now disappointed... lol!

--
Cheers...
Mick
Gave up on viruses & trojans - moved to Linux... :-)
Nascom & Gemini info at http://www.nascom.info
  #4 (permalink)  
Old May 22nd 04, 07:10 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Fleetie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 449
Default Needs to

The gent in question will definitely learn from this mistake one way or
another...


No doubt.

The most enduring lessons are those that hurt most, whether financially
or emotionally.

This lesson is: Read carefully and consider the price.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.