A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

LP12 - replacing tonearm cable?



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old June 15th 04, 11:16 PM posted to rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Rob Fisher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default LP12 - replacing tonearm cable?

I'm considering replacing the tonearm cable in my LP12 (Ittok
LVII/Arkiv/Lingo/Microgroove+ phono stage) most likely with a Russ Andrews
TAK-Cu. Anybody got any opinions? It seems like a sensible kind of
upgrade, but I'm a little wary of Russ Andrews because he seems to sell a
lot of - in my opinion - snake oil. (£900 mains cables, mains purifiers
etc.)

ta


Rob

BTW I wouldn't be fitting it myself - the deck's due a service, and I'd have
it fitted professionally then.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old June 16th 04, 12:17 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
MiNe 109
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 109
Default LP12 - replacing tonearm cable?

In article ,
Rob Fisher wrote:

I'm considering replacing the tonearm cable in my LP12 (Ittok
LVII/Arkiv/Lingo/Microgroove+ phono stage) most likely with a Russ Andrews
TAK-Cu. Anybody got any opinions? It seems like a sensible kind of
upgrade, but I'm a little wary of Russ Andrews because he seems to sell a
lot of - in my opinion - snake oil. (£900 mains cables, mains purifiers
etc.)


BTW I wouldn't be fitting it myself - the deck's due a service, and I'd have
it fitted professionally then.


I haven't heard the Kimber you refer to, but I think it should work. Let
me know if it does: I have a similar LP12 (Ittok LVII/Arkiv/Valhalla).

Kimber may be pricier in the UK. The TAK-Cu is about $250 here.

Isn't there a new Linn tonearm cable? I couldn't find it on the website.

Stephen
  #3 (permalink)  
Old June 16th 04, 11:35 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Arny Krueger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,850
Default LP12 - replacing tonearm cable?

Rob Fisher wrote:
I'm considering replacing the tonearm cable in my LP12 (Ittok
LVII/Arkiv/Lingo/Microgroove+ phono stage) most likely with a Russ
Andrews TAK-Cu. Anybody got any opinions? It seems like a sensible
kind of upgrade, but I'm a little wary of Russ Andrews because he
seems to sell a lot of - in my opinion - snake oil. (£900 mains
cables, mains purifiers etc.)


If it's not broke...


  #4 (permalink)  
Old June 27th 04, 10:07 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Rob Fisher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default LP12 - replacing tonearm cable?

Thanks for the opnions everybody. In the end I decided not to bother
upgrading the tonearm cable, and spent the money on a stack of records
instead. They all, of course, sound great on the system I already have.


Rob
  #5 (permalink)  
Old June 27th 04, 10:59 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,412
Default LP12 - replacing tonearm cable?

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:07:37 +0100, Rob Fisher
wrote:

Thanks for the opnions everybody. In the end I decided not to bother
upgrading the tonearm cable, and spent the money on a stack of records
instead. They all, of course, sound great on the system I already have.


Rob


Wisdom! Nice one...

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
  #6 (permalink)  
Old June 28th 04, 04:30 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default LP12 - replacing tonearm cable?


"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:07:37 +0100, Rob Fisher
wrote:

Thanks for the opnions everybody. In the end I decided not to bother
upgrading the tonearm cable, and spent the money on a stack of records
instead. They all, of course, sound great on the system I already have.


Rob


Wisdom! Nice one...



Seconded....






  #7 (permalink)  
Old June 16th 04, 08:17 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,051
Default LP12 - replacing tonearm cable?

In article , Rob
Fisher wrote:
I'm considering replacing the tonearm cable in my LP12 (Ittok
LVII/Arkiv/Lingo/Microgroove+ phono stage) most likely with a Russ
Andrews TAK-Cu. Anybody got any opinions? It seems like a sensible kind
of upgrade,


Can you say what it is about the existing cables that leads pun :-) you
to conclude that they require replacement or 'upgrade'?

Slainte,

Jim

--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html
Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html
  #8 (permalink)  
Old June 16th 04, 08:45 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Rob Fisher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default LP12 - replacing tonearm cable?

Can you say what it is about the existing cables that leads pun :-) you
to conclude that they require replacement or 'upgrade'?



Nothing really. I think I've got that "need to upgrade" itch!

I am thinking though that in the twenty or so years since my turntable was
made, cable technology might have moved on a bit. The existing wires and
plugs really don't look up to much, and they do carry the most important
and low-level signal in the system. The arm, the cartridge and the phono
stage have all been upgraded, but the signal still goes through the same
wire.

I'm pretty skeptical about plugs and cables, which is why I canvassed for
opinion, but there does seem to be a certain logic in having this
particular bit of wire be the best shielded one in the system.



Rob
  #9 (permalink)  
Old June 17th 04, 08:33 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,051
Default LP12 - replacing tonearm cable?

In article , Rob
Fisher wrote:
Can you say what it is about the existing cables that leads pun :-)
you to conclude that they require replacement or 'upgrade'?



Nothing really. I think I've got that "need to upgrade" itch!


Based on my own experience and understanding - If you want a better sound
my personal reaction would be to focus on the speakers, or perhaps the
cartridge... If your cartridge has a low output impedance I would not
expect a change of cable to do as much as a change of speakers - or even as
much as moving your listening position.

I am thinking though that in the twenty or so years since my turntable
was made, cable technology might have moved on a bit. The existing wires
and plugs really don't look up to much, and they do carry the most
important and low-level signal in the system. The arm, the cartridge and
the phono stage have all been upgraded, but the signal still goes
through the same wire.


If the connectors have tarnished they may require replacement. However I
have my doubts that cable technology has "moved on a bit" in a way that
will produce a significant improvement if you original cables are OK.

I'm pretty skeptical about plugs and cables, which is why I canvassed
for opinion, but there does seem to be a certain logic in having this
particular bit of wire be the best shielded one in the system.


Can you hear any hum with the volume set to normal levels and no LP
playing?

When playing an LP with the volume wound up on a quiet passage, is the hum
distinctly louder than the background noise/rumble?

When not playing an LP do you hear any 'plops' or 'clicks'? Or do you
sometimes get local taxi firms, etc, audible via the LP input?

If the answers to the above are "no" then - unless you have some other
reason - there seems to be no reason to feel you need better shielding for
these cables.

If any answer is "yes", then a change of cable *might* be useful. But the
problem may come from elsewhere, so this would not be a certain sign.

I'd agree that this is where the signal level is very low and so needs
careful shielding and conveying. However my experience is that people have
been making cables that do this just fine in most circumstances for
decades. :-)

Slainte,

Jim

--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html
Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html
  #10 (permalink)  
Old June 16th 04, 03:40 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Dave xxxx
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default LP12 - replacing tonearm cable?

Rob Fisher wrote:
I'm considering replacing the tonearm cable in my LP12 (Ittok
LVII/Arkiv/Lingo/Microgroove+ phono stage) most likely with a Russ
Andrews TAK-Cu. Anybody got any opinions? It seems like a sensible
kind of upgrade, but I'm a little wary of Russ Andrews because he
seems to sell a lot of - in my opinion - snake oil. (£900 mains
cables, mains purifiers etc.)

ta


Rob

BTW I wouldn't be fitting it myself - the deck's due a service, and
I'd have it fitted professionally then.


Depending on your cartridge MM MC depends which RA cables you can use the
cheaper of his cables, only works with MC cartridge I think.



--
Dave xxxx
http://www.davewhitter.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
Steam is Fun


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.