If you had the choice of these two what would you choose? :-D

11ft pair of Kimber KS-3038 speaker cable £8435

or

Lexicon MC-1 £1200
7 channels of amplification say - £2500
7.1 audio system, - 3100
DVD player £300
Learning remote £150
32" widescreen TV £600
All cables £200
£300 worth of films.
Total = £8400

hmm tough decision. ;-)

If it brings me closer to the "perfect" Hi Fidelity sound that I want then
the cable without doubt!!
how can you have "pure" sounf from digital sound processing ? a CD player
is a bad enough abomination of an analouge signal.And dont slag off analouge
sources without analouge sound you could not hear anything.


"Nath" wrote in message
...
If you had the choice of these two what would you choose? :-D

11ft pair of Kimber KS-3038 speaker cable £8435

or

Lexicon MC-1 £1200
7 channels of amplification say - £2500
7.1 audio system, - 3100
DVD player £300
Learning remote £150
32" widescreen TV £600
All cables £200
£300 worth of films.
Total = £8400

hmm tough decision. ;-)

StaffBull wrote:
If it brings me closer to the "perfect" Hi Fidelity sound that I want
then the cable without doubt!!
how can you have "pure" sounf from digital sound processing ? a CD
player is a bad enough abomination of an analouge signal.And dont
slag off analouge sources without analouge sound you could not hear
anything.

What's an 'analouge'? Is it some species of oil-bearing snake?

Hi,

In message , Stimpy
writes
StaffBull wrote:
If it brings me closer to the "perfect" Hi Fidelity sound that I want
then the cable without doubt!!
how can you have "pure" sounf from digital sound processing ? a CD
player is a bad enough abomination of an analouge signal.And dont
slag off analouge sources without analouge sound you could not hear
anything.

What's an 'analouge'? Is it some species of oil-bearing snake?

I just checked my wife's medical textbook. Apparently it's a haemorrhoid
treatment.

--
Regards,
Glenn Booth

In message , StaffBull
writes
If it brings me closer to the "perfect" Hi Fidelity sound that I want then
the cable without doubt!!
how can you have "pure" sounf from digital sound processing ? a CD player
is a bad enough abomination of an analouge signal.And dont slag off analouge
sources without analouge sound you could not hear anything.



Wow! A top-posting analouge troll. Is analouge some painful sort of
rectal complaint?

--
Chris Morriss

"Chris Morriss" wrote in message
...
In message , StaffBull
writes
If it brings me closer to the "perfect" Hi Fidelity sound that I want
then
the cable without doubt!!
how can you have "pure" sounf from digital sound processing ? a CD
player
is a bad enough abomination of an analouge signal.And dont slag off
analouge
sources without analouge sound you could not hear anything.



Wow! A top-posting analouge troll. Is analouge some painful sort of
rectal complaint?

I thought I recognised the name. In an earlier post, Staffbull said:

"In the last two years I have bought two cars brand new costing a total of
£43k and did not test drive either!!".

So £8.5k for speaker cable is just pocket money.

Roy.

Roy wrote:

I thought I recognised the name. In an earlier post, Staffbull said:

"In the last two years I have bought two cars brand new costing a
total of £43k and did not test drive either!!".

So £8.5k for speaker cable is just pocket money.

....and the fact he doesn't test drive a car before spending approx £21k on
it says a great deal about his discernment and desire to find the best
product for *him* rather then the product he's told is "the best"

In article ,
StaffBull wrote:
If it brings me closer to the "perfect" Hi Fidelity sound that I want
then the cable without doubt!! how can you have "pure" sounf from
digital sound processing

I'd love to know what you listen to that doesn't include 'digital sound
processing'...

But then you can hear the difference in cables. So that explains it.

--
*If I worked as much as others, I would do as little as they *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

But then you can hear the difference in cables. So that explains it.

Careful - there are people who claim to tell the difference in solder.

"The standard leaded Kester (Sn63/Pb37 Product 24-6337-0027 .031 22swg or
Sn62/Pb36/Ag02) with the "44" core sounds good too, but with a slight loss of
resolution compared to the Kester SN95. My favorite solder with the "44" core
is Kester's Sn95/Ag05 lead free silver solder. My favorite solder with the
IA-423 is Johnson's OR-120 organic core version. (Their "rosin" version is
awful, BTW.) Most other solders create a "brittle" or bright sound because most
rosins perform poorly in regard to high-fidelity interface. If the system is
slightly bright, the Kester I mentioned will warm it up a tad. If the system is
either warm or accurate, I'd go with the IA-423 Organic Core"

=== Andy Evans ===
Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com
Audio, music and health pages and interesting links.

Andy Evans wrote:

Careful - there are people who claim to tell the difference in solder.

"The standard leaded Kester (Sn63/Pb37 Product 24-6337-0027 .031
22swg or Sn62/Pb36/Ag02) with the "44" core sounds good too, but with
a slight loss of resolution compared to the Kester SN95. My favorite
solder with the "44" core is Kester's Sn95/Ag05 lead free silver
solder. My favorite solder with the IA-423 is Johnson's OR-120
organic core version. (Their "rosin" version is awful, BTW.) Most
other solders create a "brittle" or bright sound because most rosins
perform poorly in regard to high-fidelity interface. If the system is
slightly bright, the Kester I mentioned will warm it up a tad. If the
system is either warm or accurate, I'd go with the IA-423 Organic
Core"

PLEASE tell me that's a spoof!