
October 4th 04, 07:06 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Big Sub
"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm
want two lol
Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)
|

October 4th 04, 09:04 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Big Sub
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:
"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
k...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm
want two lol
Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)
Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
|

October 4th 04, 09:34 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Big Sub
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:
"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
. uk...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm
want two lol
Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)
Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................
I trust fellow 'sportsmen' here will note that I don't take an easy shot at
this 'low bird'...... ;-)
|

October 4th 04, 09:39 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Big Sub
"Keith G" wrote in message
...
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:
"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
.uk...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm
want two lol
Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)
Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................
I trust fellow 'sportsmen' here will note that I don't take an easy shot
at this 'low bird'...... ;-)
:-)
|

October 4th 04, 10:04 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Big Sub
"Keith G" wrote in message
...
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:
"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
.uk...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm
want two lol
Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)
Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................
I trust fellow 'sportsmen' here will note that I don't take an easy shot
at this 'low bird'...... ;-)
Best easy shot is with a http://photogallery.net/sub.jpg big sub......
|

October 5th 04, 06:41 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Big Sub
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 23:04:07 +0100, "Mike Gilmour"
wrote:
"Keith G" wrote in message
...
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:
"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
o.uk...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm
want two lol
Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)
Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................
I trust fellow 'sportsmen' here will note that I don't take an easy shot
at this 'low bird'...... ;-)
Best easy shot is with a http://photogallery.net/sub.jpg big sub......
When the not quite infinite baffles go down on that one, it leaves a
big hole in the ocean............. :-)
Shame that Keith doesn't understand cabin gain, and compression ratios
in horns, but then there's so much about audio that Keith obviously
doesn't understand......... :-)
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
|

October 5th 04, 11:05 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Big Sub
"Mike Gilmour" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message
...
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:
"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
o.uk...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm
want two lol
Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)
Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................
I trust fellow 'sportsmen' here will note that I don't take an easy shot
at this 'low bird'...... ;-)
Best easy shot is with a http://photogallery.net/sub.jpg big sub......
I've been contemplating building a sub, but not quite on this scale!!! ;-)
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
|