![]() |
Any great unknown speaker brands?
"MINe 109" wrote
(Still remember listening at nearly top volume to Metallica "One" on NS-1000Ms with a Quad 606 in the late 80s in the dem room at Chatham Sevenoaks Hi-Fi, where I had a part-time job back then, after we'd shut the shop. Our ears nearly bled!) I've seen them, but have never heard them. They (NS-1000M) were noted for being efficient *and* being able to take high power. Martin -- M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890 Manchester, U.K. http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk |
Any great unknown speaker brands?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:20:18 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote: In article , Arny Krueger wrote: So far we've been told that the holy grail in turntable platters is either glass or plexiglass. These are very different materials. The fact that the parameters of a 100 year old technology can't be nailed down any better then this is indicative of how much ******** rules the world of vinyl playback engineering. A disc with a pickup resting on it acts rather like the diaphragm of a microphone. Anyone who ever had a Transcriptors's design will be well aware of this.;-) So it seems only common sense to me that the disc must be isolated from vibration of any sort - either structure or air borne. Including those from the speakers. This must involve some form of heavy cover to the entire turntable assembly. Not if the disc is clamped to large mass of mechanically compatible material - such as vinyl or acrylic. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
Any great unknown speaker brands?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:26:52 GMT, Joseph Oberlander
wrote: MINe 109 wrote: Studio monitors would be a bad choice for the OP. He wants a floorstander roughly equivalent to his KEF 104s and prefers classical music. Monitors are often meant for tabletop positioning and have frequency responses bumps to exaggerate recording/production flaws. Honestly, he's going to have to look really really hard to find a better speaker than his 104s. He might look into large planars or move to full-range electrostatics. I had 104s, and I can assure you that he will have no troble at all in this regard. Given our new knowledge of his budget, I'd suggest a hard look at the B&W N804, the Spendor S9 and the JMLab Elektra range. Also of course the incomparable Quad 988/989 for a completely different experience. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
Any great unknown speaker brands?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:12:42 GMT, "Fleetie"
wrote: "MINe 109" wrote PS I forget Focal-JM Lab!: "The beryllium dome represents a quantum advance in tweeter technology". Duhhh, didn't the seminal Yamaha NS-1000M use a beryllium tweeter? And a beryllium midrange! -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
Any great unknown speaker brands?
Dodge McRodgered wrote: "Joseph Oberlander" emitted : Based on recent listening evaluations, the bang-for-buck leader in studio monitors could easily be the Behringer B2031A. They would make very gutsy but nice-sounding speaker/amplifiers for use with a computer system and/or CD player. Those do look interesting. The thing is, who wants to support a company which lifts ideas from others who do all the hard work?? But that's the American way of doing business! |
Any great unknown speaker brands?
Ross Matheson wrote: Joseph Oberlander commented : MINe 109 wrote: : : Studio monitors would be a bad choice for the OP. He wants a : floorstander roughly equivalent to his KEF 104s and prefers classical : music. Monitors are often meant for tabletop positioning and have : frequency responses bumps to exaggerate recording/production flaws. : : Honestly, he's going to have to look really really hard to find : a better speaker than his 104s. He might look into large planars : or move to full-range electrostatics. You guys are getting off on a tangent here. The OP (and my virtual ears pricked up, because I own exactly the same model) specifically mentioned Kef 104*ab*, not Kef 104 the much later reference model. Mine are marked "1972" on the back of the bass drivers ... but I can't afford to upgrade *yet*. Indeed, no-one has mentioned the later (or latest) Kef models as contenders until now, I think. Surely they would be a suitable & obvious upgrade? Well... I thought he had the 104/6s. For $1200-$1500, he can find mint pair with dual terminals and then get them re-foamed for good measure. Few things will sound as good for the money. |
Any great unknown speaker brands?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:52:10 GMT, "Fleetie"
wrote: "MINe 109" wrote (Still remember listening at nearly top volume to Metallica "One" on NS-1000Ms with a Quad 606 in the late 80s in the dem room at Chatham Sevenoaks Hi-Fi, where I had a part-time job back then, after we'd shut the shop. Our ears nearly bled!) I've seen them, but have never heard them. They (NS-1000M) were noted for being efficient *and* being able to take high power. Yep, one of the truly great speakers. I wish I'd been able to afford to keep mine. AFAIK, they still make them for the Japanese market. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
Any great unknown speaker brands?
"François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:51:11 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: For example, I've heard the Behringer B2031A speakers that I mentioned, mounted on speaker stands. They sounded warm and well-balanced, like many floorstanders. Provided you pick the right settings... The good news is that the settings are there to pick from. Because of the active crossover design they are far more flexible and useful than the usual tweeter level controls found on passive speakers. They are also reasonably smooth. Very smooth when properly used. At less than EUR 400 Per pair, all inclusve, they are a real bargain. Agreed. Since the issue was raised, I'm wondering how they would sound compared to KEF 104s. It's been a long time since I've heard KEF 104s. From what I recall, their performance was not unassailable. |
Any great unknown speaker brands?
"Dodge McRodgered" wrote in message
"Joseph Oberlander" emitted : Based on recent listening evaluations, the bang-for-buck leader in studio monitors could easily be the Behringer B2031A. They would make very gutsy but nice-sounding speaker/amplifiers for use with a computer system and/or CD player. Those do look interesting. The thing is, who wants to support a company which lifts ideas from others who do all the hard work?? You mean companies like Mackie whose HR824s are slavish copies of Genelecs? |
Any great unknown speaker brands?
In article ,
Stewart Pinkerton wrote: So it seems only common sense to me that the disc must be isolated from vibration of any sort - either structure or air borne. Including those from the speakers. This must involve some form of heavy cover to the entire turntable assembly. Not if the disc is clamped to large mass of mechanically compatible material - such as vinyl or acrylic. It's a point, but then the disc itself isn't rigid. And most would prefer it not to be in direct contact with a material harder than itself for practical reasons. -- *Oh, what a tangled website we weave when first we practice * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk